18
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      A mechanistic model for predicting the nutrient requirements and feed biological values for sheep1

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references43

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Statistical validation

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            A net carbohydrate and protein system for evaluating cattle diets: III. Cattle requirements and diet adequacy.

            The Cornell Net Carbohydrate and Protein System (CNCPS) has equations for predicting nutrient requirements, feed intake, and feed utilization over wide variations in cattle (frame size, body condition, and stage of growth), feed carbohydrate and protein fractions and their digestion and passage rates, and environmental conditions. Independent data were used to validate the ability of the CNCPS to predict responses compared to National Research Council (NRC) systems. With DMI in steers, the CNCPS had a 12% lower standard error of the Y estimate (Sy.x) and three percentage units less bias than the NRC system. For DMI in heifers, both systems had a similar Sy.x but the NRC had four percentage units less bias. With lactating dairy cows' DMI, the CNCPS had a 12% lower Sy.x. Observed NEm requirement averaged 5% under NRC and 6% under CNCPS predicted values at temperatures above 9 degrees C but were 18% over NRC and 9% under CNCPS at temperatures under 9 degrees C. Energy retained was predicted with an R2 of .80 and .95 and a bias of 8 and 4% for the NRC and CNCPS, respectively. Protein retained was predicted with an R2 of .75 and .85 with a bias of 0 and -1% for NRC and CNCPS, respectively. Biases due to frame size, implant, or NEg were small. Body condition scores predicted body fat percentage in dairy cows with an R2 of .93 and a Sy.x of 2.35% body fat. The CNCPS predicted metabolizable protein allowable ADG with a bias of 1.6% with a Sy.x of .07 kg compared to values of -30% and .10 kg, respectively for the NRC system.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Mean squared error of prediction as a criterion for evaluating and comparing system models

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Journal of Animal Science
                American Society of Animal Science (ASAS)
                0021-8812
                1525-3163
                January 01 2004
                January 01 2004
                : 82
                : 1
                : 149-169
                Article
                10.2527/2004.821149x
                14753358
                8593777a-9ea6-4c7a-8eaf-2ccc24f720d7
                © 2004
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article