68
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      HIV and risk environment for injecting drug users: the past, present, and future

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          We systematically reviewed reports about determinants of HIV infection in injecting drug users from 2000 to 2009, classifying findings by type of environmental influence. We then modelled changes in risk environments in regions with severe HIV epidemics associated with injecting drug use. Of 94 studies identified, 25 intentionally examined risk environments. Modelling of HIV epidemics showed substantial heterogeneity in the number of HIV infections that are attributed to injecting drug use and unprotected sex. We estimate that, during 2010–15, HIV prevalence could be reduced by 41% in Odessa (Ukraine), 43% in Karachi (Pakistan), and 30% in Nairobi (Kenya) through a 60% reduction of the unmet need of programmes for opioid substitution, needle exchange, and antiretroviral therapy. Mitigation of patient transition to injecting drugs from non-injecting forms could avert a 98% increase in HIV infections in Karachi; whereas elimination of laws prohibiting opioid substitution with concomitant scale-up could prevent 14% of HIV infections in Nairobi. Optimisation of effectiveness and coverage of interventions is crucial for regions with rapidly growing epidemics. Delineation of environmental risk factors provides a crucial insight into HIV prevention. Evidence-informed, rights-based, combination interventions protecting IDUs’ access to HIV prevention and treatment could substantially curtail HIV epidemics.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Contributors
          Role: Prof
          Role: Prof
          Journal
          2985213R
          5470
          Lancet
          Lancet
          Lancet (London, England)
          0140-6736
          1474-547X
          8 March 2019
          24 July 2010
          15 April 2019
          : 376
          : 9737
          : 268-284
          Affiliations
          Department of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, Division of Global Public Health, CA, USA
          Imperial College, London,London, UK
          University College London, UK
          London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, University of London, UK
          University of Colorado Denver, CO, USA
          United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, Regional Office for Eastern Africa, Kenya
          Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS, Geneva, Switzerland
          Author notes

          Contributors

          SAS devised the topic for systematic review and modelling, was lead author of the report, and oversaw the review process. TBH devised and carried out the modelling scenarios and wrote corresponding methods, results, and interpretation sections. CAH, TR, and NB extracted and categorised data for systematic review, assisted with collection of secondary data for the modelling scenarios, and helped to write the report and interpret results. RB and RA provided primary data for modelling scenarios, and assisted with interpretation of results and report revision.

          Correspondence to: Dr Steffanie A Strathdee, University of California San Diego, Division of Global Public Health, Department of Medicine, CA 92093-0507, USA sstrathdee@ 123456ucsd.edu
          Article
          PMC6464374 PMC6464374 6464374 nihpa1006149
          10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60743-X
          6464374
          20650523
          859ad554-c8e3-4019-89fb-b2657cd4e61e
          History
          Categories
          Article

          Comments

          Comment on this article