43
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Two doses of botulinum toxin type A for the treatment of trigeminal neuralgia: observation of therapeutic effect from a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          In the majority of cases, trigeminal neuralgia (TN) is a unilateral condition with ultra-short stabbing pain located along one or more branches of the trigeminal nerve. Although prophylactic pharmacological treatment is first choise, considering of insufficient effect or unacceptable side effects, neurosurgical treatment or lesion treatment should be considered. In addition to all these procedures mentioned above, one approach has been based on local intradermal and/or submucosal injections of Botulinum Toxin Type A (BTX-A).

          Methods

          We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled since November 2012, and adopted local multi-point injection in 84 cases of classical TN with different doses of BTX-A. Eighty four patients were randomized into following groups: placebo (n = 28); BTX-A 25U (n = 27); BTX-A 75U (n = 29). Follow-up visits were conducted every week after the injection, and the overall duration of the study for each patient were 8 weeks to observe the pain severity, efficacy and adverse reactions at endpoint.

          Results

          The visual analogue scale (VAS) scores of 25U and 75U groups reduced significantly compared to placebo as early as week 1, and sustained until week 8 throughout the study. There was no significant difference in VAS between 25U and 75U groups throughout the study. The response rates of 25U group (70.4%) and 75U group (86.2%) were significantly higher than placebo group (32.1%) at week 8, and there was no significant difference between 25U and 75U groups. Evaluation of the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) demonstrated that 66.7% (25U group) and 75.9% (75U group) of the patients reported that their pain symptoms were ‘much improved’ or ‘very much improved’ versus 32.1% of the placebo group, and there was also no significant difference between 25U and 75U groups. All adverse reactions were graded as mild or moderate.

          Conclusions

          BTX-A injection in TN is safe and efficient. It is a useful treatment for refractory TN. Lower dose (25U) and high dose (75U) were similar in efficacy in short-term.

          Related collections

          Most cited references26

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          The International Classification of Headache Disorders: 2nd edition.

          (2004)
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Review of a proposed mechanism for the antinociceptive action of botulinum toxin type A.

            K. Aoki (2005)
            Botulinum toxin type A (BOTOX) has been used to treat pathological pain conditions although the mechanism is not entirely understood. Subcutaneous (s.c.) BOTOX also inhibits inflammatory pain in the rat formalin model, and the present study examined whether this could be due to a direct action on sensory neurons. BOTOX (3.5-30 U/kg) was injected s.c. into the subplantar surface of the rat hind paw followed 1-5 days later by 50 mL of 5% formalin. Using microdialysis, we found that BOTOX significantly inhibited formalin-induced glutamate release (peak inhibitions: 35%, 41%, and 45% with 3.5, 7, and 15 U/kg, respectively). BOTOX also dose dependently reduced the number of formalin-induced Fos-like immunoreactive cells in the dorsal horn of the spinal cord and significantly (15 and 30 U/kg) inhibited the excitation of wide dynamic range neurons of the dorsal horn in Phase II but not Phase I of the formalin response. These results indicate that s.c. BOTOX inhibits neurotransmitter release from primary sensory neurons in the rat formalin model. Through this mechanism, BOTOX inhibits peripheral sensitization in these models, which leads to an indirect reduction in central sensitization.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Transcriptional and posttranslational plasticity and the generation of inflammatory pain.

              Inflammatory pain manifests as spontaneous pain and pain hypersensitivity. Spontaneous pain reflects direct activation of specific receptors on nociceptor terminals by inflammatory mediators. Pain hypersensitivity is the consequence of early posttranslational changes, both in the peripheral terminals of the nociceptor and in dorsal horn neurons, as well as later transcription-dependent changes in effector genes, again in primary sensory and dorsal horn neurons. This inflammatory neuroplasticity is the consequence of a combination of activity-dependent changes in the neurons and specific signal molecules initiating particular signal-transduction pathways. These pathways phosphorylate membrane proteins, changing their function, and activate transcription factors, altering gene expression. Two distinct aspects of sensory neuron function are changed as a result of these processes, basal sensitivity, or the capacity of peripheral stimuli to evoke pain, and stimulus-evoked hypersensitivity, the capacity of certain inputs to generate prolonged alterations in the sensitivity of the system. Posttranslational changes largely alter basal sensitivity. Transcriptional changes both potentiate the system and alter neuronal phenotype. Potentiation occurs as a result of the up-regulation in the dorsal root ganglion of centrally acting neuromodulators and simultaneously in the dorsal horn of their receptors. This means that the response to subsequent inputs is augmented, particularly those that induce stimulus-induced hypersensitivity. Alterations in phenotype includes the acquisition by A fibers of neurochemical features typical of C fibers, enabling these fibers to induce stimulus-evoked hypersensitivity, something only C fiber inputs normally can do. Elucidation of the molecular mechanisms responsible provides new opportunities for therapeutic approaches to managing inflammatory pain.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                J Headache Pain
                J Headache Pain
                The Journal of Headache and Pain
                Springer
                1129-2369
                1129-2377
                2014
                27 September 2014
                : 15
                : 1
                : 65
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Neurology, the First Affiliated Hospital, Zhengzhou University, 1 Jianshe East R, Zhengzhou City, HeNan Province 450052, People’s Republic of China
                Article
                1129-2377-15-65
                10.1186/1129-2377-15-65
                4194456
                25263254
                85c26b83-e0d8-4fb2-ac3b-7f2176b8bca5
                Copyright © 2014 Zhang et al.; licensee Springer.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.

                History
                : 17 August 2014
                : 22 September 2014
                Categories
                Research Article

                Anesthesiology & Pain management
                botulinum toxin type a,trigeminal neuralgia,double-blind,placebo-controlled treatment

                Comments

                Comment on this article