15
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Overall survival of stage IV non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with Viscum album L. in addition to chemotherapy, a real-world observational multicenter analysis

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is associated with a five-year survival rate of around 1%. Treatment with Viscum album L. (VA) extracts has been shown to reduce chemotherapy (CTx)-related adverse events, decrease CTx dose reductions and improve quality of life in a number of cancers. Recent data suggest a beneficial effect of add-on treatment with Viscum album L. (VA, European mistletoe) on survival in cancer patients. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of VA in addition to chemotherapy on survival in stage IV NSCLC patients.

          Methods

          The observational study was conducted using data from the Network Oncology clinical registry which is an accredited conjoint clinical registry of German oncological hospitals, practitioners and out-patient centers.Patients were included if they had stage IV NSCLC at diagnosis, lived at least for four weeks post-diagnosis and received chemotherapeutic treatment. Patients with EGFR mutations as well as patients receiving tyrosine kinase inhibitors or immune checkpoint inhibitors were not included. Overall survival and impact on hazard in patients with chemotherapy (CTx) to patients receiving CTx plus VA were compared. To identify factors associated with survival and to address potential sources of bias a multivariate analyses using Cox proportional hazard model was performed.

          Results

          The median age of the population was 64.1 years with 55.7% male patients. The highest proportion of patients had adenocarcinoma (72.2%) and most of the patients were current or past smokers (70.9%). Of 158 stage IV NSCLC patients, 108 received CTx only and 50 additional VA. Median survival was 17.0 months in the CTx plus VA group (95%CI: 11.0–40.0) and was 8.0 months (95%CI: 7.0–11.0) in the CTx only group (χ 2 = 7.2, p = .007). Overall survival was significantly prolonged in the VA group (HR 0.44, 95%CI: 0.26–0.74, p = .002). One-year and three-year overall survival rates were greater with CTx plus VA compared to CTX alone (1y: 60.2% vs. 35.5%; 3y: 25.7% vs. 14.2%).

          Conclusion

          Our findings suggest that concomitant VA is positively associated with survival in stage IV NSCLC patients treated with standard CTx. These findings complement pre-existing knowldedge of add-on VA’s clinical impact, however, results should be interpreted with caution in light of the study’s observational character.

          Related collections

          Most cited references58

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Real-world Data for Clinical Evidence Generation in Oncology

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Review article: Influence of Viscum album L (European mistletoe) extracts on quality of life in cancer patients: a systematic review of controlled clinical studies.

            To evaluate controlled clinical studies on the efficacy and effectiveness of Viscum album for quality of life (QoL) in cancer. The authors conducted a search of 7 electronic databases and reference lists and had extensive consultations with experts. They carried out a criteria-based assessment of methodological study quality. The authors identified 26 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 10 non-RCTs that investigated the influence of V album extracts (VAEs) on QoL in malignant diseases; 26 studies assessed patient-reported QoL. Questionnaires were mostly well established and validated. Half of the studies investigated VAEs concomitant with chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or surgery. Some studies were well designed, whereas others had minor or major methodological weaknesses. Among the 26 RCTs, 22 reported a QoL benefit, 3 indicated no difference, and 1 did not report any result. All the non-RCTs reported a QoL benefit. Of the studies with higher methodological quality, most reported a benefit, whereas 1 found no difference. Improvements were mainly in regard to coping, fatigue, sleep, exhaustion, energy, nausea, vomiting, appetite, depression, anxiety, ability to work, and emotional and functional well-being in general and, less consistently, in regard to pain, diarrhea, general performance, and side effects of conventional treatments. VAEs were well tolerated. VAEs seem to have an impact on QoL and reduction of side effects of conventional therapies (chemotherapy, radiation) in experimental trials as well as in routine daily application. The influence on fatigue especially should be investigated further.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Clinical practice guidelines on the use of integrative therapies as supportive care in patients treated for breast cancer.

              The majority of breast cancer patients use complementary and/or integrative therapies during and beyond cancer treatment to manage symptoms, prevent toxicities, and improve quality of life. Practice guidelines are needed to inform clinicians and patients about safe and effective therapies.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: InvestigationRole: MethodologyRole: Project administrationRole: ResourcesRole: SupervisionRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Data curationRole: Formal analysisRole: MethodologyRole: ValidationRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Formal analysisRole: MethodologyRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Data curationRole: MethodologyRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: InvestigationRole: MethodologyRole: ValidationRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: InvestigationRole: MethodologyRole: ValidationRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: InvestigationRole: MethodologyRole: ValidationRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                PLoS ONE
                plos
                plosone
                PLoS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, CA USA )
                1932-6203
                27 August 2018
                2018
                : 13
                : 8
                : e0203058
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Research Institute Havelhöhe, Hospital Havelhöhe, Berlin, Germany
                [2 ] Interdisciplinary Oncology and Palliative Care, Hospital Havelhöhe, Berlin, Germany
                [3 ] Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
                [4 ] Lung Cancer Center and Department of Pneumology, Hospital Havelhöhe, Berlin, Germany
                [5 ] Medical Clinic for Gastroenterology, Infectiology and Rheumatology CBF and Institute of Social Medicine, Epidemiology and Health Economics CCM, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany
                Peking University People's Hospital, CHINA
                Author notes

                Competing Interests: Dr. Schad reports grants from Helixor Heilmittel GmbH, grants from Abnoba GmbH, grants from Iscador AG, outside the submitted work. Dr. Grah reports grants from Iscador AG, outside the submitted work. Grants from Helixor Heilmittel GmbH include travel costs and honoraria for speaking. There are no other relationships/conditions/circumstances that present a potential conflict of interest. There are no patents, products in development or marketed products to declare. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials. No payment was received for any other aspects of the submitted work. The other authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6928-6209
                Article
                PONE-D-17-42556
                10.1371/journal.pone.0203058
                6110500
                30148853
                85dcaeb8-b3ee-462e-a5ad-f5cf6dbf0d87
                © 2018 Schad et al

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 19 December 2017
                : 14 August 2018
                Page count
                Figures: 4, Tables: 6, Pages: 19
                Funding
                The Network Oncology was funded by unrestricted research grants from Iscador AG Arlesheim, Switzerland; ABNOBA GmbH Pforzheim, Germany; and Helixor GmbH Rosenfeld, Germany. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. By contract, researchers were independent from the funder.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Oncology
                Cancers and Neoplasms
                Lung and Intrathoracic Tumors
                Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Oncology
                Cancer Treatment
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Anatomy
                Histology
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Anatomy
                Histology
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Oncology
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Oncology
                Cancers and Neoplasms
                Carcinomas
                Squamous Cell Carcinomas
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Oncology
                Cancers and Neoplasms
                Carcinomas
                Research and Analysis Methods
                Biological Cultures
                Cell Cultures
                Cultured Tumor Cells
                Carcinoma Cells
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Diagnostic Medicine
                Cancer Detection and Diagnosis
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Oncology
                Cancer Detection and Diagnosis
                Custom metadata
                The anonymized data that support the findings of this study are openly available in the repository “figshare” ( https://figshare.com/s/37063c430a023f61b6ac, DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.6449597).

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article