30
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Shrinking body size as an ecological response to climate change

      ,
      Nature Climate Change
      Springer Nature America, Inc

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references69

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Global warming benefits the small in aquatic ecosystems.

          Understanding the ecological impacts of climate change is a crucial challenge of the twenty-first century. There is a clear lack of general rules regarding the impacts of global warming on biota. Here, we present a metaanalysis of the effect of climate change on body size of ectothermic aquatic organisms (bacteria, phyto- and zooplankton, and fish) from the community to the individual level. Using long-term surveys, experimental data and published results, we show a significant increase in the proportion of small-sized species and young age classes and a decrease in size-at-age. These results are in accordance with the ecological rules dealing with the temperature-size relationships (i.e., Bergmann's rule, James' rule and Temperature-Size Rule). Our study provides evidence that reduced body size is the third universal ecological response to global warming in aquatic systems besides the shift of species ranges toward higher altitudes and latitudes and the seasonal shifts in life cycle events.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Marine calcifiers exhibit mixed responses to CO2-induced ocean acidification

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Nitrogen limitation constrains sustainability of ecosystem response to CO2.

              Enhanced plant biomass accumulation in response to elevated atmospheric CO2 concentration could dampen the future rate of increase in CO2 levels and associated climate warming. However, it is unknown whether CO2-induced stimulation of plant growth and biomass accumulation will be sustained or whether limited nitrogen (N) availability constrains greater plant growth in a CO2-enriched world. Here we show, after a six-year field study of perennial grassland species grown under ambient and elevated levels of CO2 and N, that low availability of N progressively suppresses the positive response of plant biomass to elevated CO2. Initially, the stimulation of total plant biomass by elevated CO2 was no greater at enriched than at ambient N supply. After four to six years, however, elevated CO2 stimulated plant biomass much less under ambient than enriched N supply. This response was consistent with the temporally divergent effects of elevated CO2 on soil and plant N dynamics at differing levels of N supply. Our results indicate that variability in availability of soil N and deposition of atmospheric N are both likely to influence the response of plant biomass accumulation to elevated atmospheric CO2. Given that limitations to productivity resulting from the insufficient availability of N are widespread in both unmanaged and managed vegetation, soil N supply is probably an important constraint on global terrestrial responses to elevated CO2.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Nature Climate Change
                Nature Clim Change
                Springer Nature America, Inc
                1758-678X
                1758-6798
                November 2011
                October 16 2011
                November 2011
                : 1
                : 8
                : 401-406
                Article
                10.1038/nclimate1259
                85fb51ec-389c-4c8d-9d25-29f6a003e974
                © 2011

                http://www.springer.com/tdm

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article