40
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

      To submit your manuscript, please click here

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Direct to Public Peer Support and e-Therapy Program Versus Information to Aid Self-Management of Depression and Anxiety: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial

      research-article
      , BSc (Hons), DPhil 1 , , BA (Hons), CGMA 1 , , PhD 2 , , Dip Midwifery 3 , , MA (Hons), PhD 4 , , PhD 1 , , PhD 2 ,   , BSc (Hons), MSc, MD, FRCPsych 5 , , MSc 3 , , BSc (Hons), MBBS, DCH, MRCPsych, PhD 4 , , DM 6 , , BSc (Hons), MSc, PhD 7 , , BA (Hons), MSc 1 , REBOOT Notts Lived Experience Advisory Panel 1 , , MB ChB, MRCPsych, MMedSci, MD, FRCPsych 1 ,
      (Reviewer), (Reviewer), (Reviewer)
      JMIR Research Protocols
      JMIR Publications
      depression, anxiety, peer support, online, self-management

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Regardless of geography or income, effective help for depression and anxiety only reaches a small proportion of those who might benefit from it. The scale of the problem suggests a role for effective, safe, anonymized public health–driven Web-based services such as Big White Wall (BWW), which offer immediate peer support at low cost.

          Objective

          Using Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation and Maintenance (RE-AIM) methodology, the aim of this study was to determine the population reach, effectiveness, cost-effectiveness, and barriers and drivers to implementation of BWW compared with Web-based information compiled by UK’s National Health Service (NHS, NHS Choices Moodzone) in people with probable mild to moderate depression and anxiety disorder.

          Methods

          A pragmatic, parallel-group, single-blind randomized controlled trial (RCT) is being conducted using a fully automated trial website in which eligible participants are randomized to receive either 6 months access to BWW or signposted to the NHS Moodzone site. The recruitment of 2200 people to the study will be facilitated by a public health engagement campaign involving general marketing and social media, primary care clinical champions, health care staff, large employers, and third sector groups. People will refer themselves to the study and will be eligible if they are older than 16 years, have probable mild to moderate depression or anxiety disorders, and have access to the Internet.

          Results

          The primary outcome will be the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale at 6 weeks. We will also explore the reach, maintenance, cost-effectiveness, and barriers and drivers to implementation and possible mechanisms of actions using a range of qualitative and quantitative methods.

          Conclusions

          This will be the first fully digital trial of a direct to public online peer support program for common mental disorders. The potential advantages of adding this to current NHS mental health services and the challenges of designing a public health campaign and RCT of two digital interventions using a fully automated digital enrollment and data collection process are considered for people with depression and anxiety.

          Trial Registration

          International Standard Randomized Controlled Trial Number (ISRCTN): 12673428; http://www.controlled-trials.com/ISRCTN12673428/12673428 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6uw6ZJk5a)

          Related collections

          Most cited references30

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The MOS social support survey.

          This paper describes the development and evaluation of a brief, multidimensional, self-administered, social support survey that was developed for patients in the Medical Outcomes Study (MOS), a two-year study of patients with chronic conditions. This survey was designed to be comprehensive in terms of recent thinking about the various dimensions of social support. In addition, it was designed to be distinct from other related measures. We present a summary of the major conceptual issues considered when choosing items for the social support battery, describe the items, and present findings based on data from 2987 patients (ages 18 and older). Multitrait scaling analyses supported the dimensionality of four functional support scales (emotional/informational, tangible, affectionate, and positive social interaction) and the construction of an overall functional social support index. These support measures are distinct from structural measures of social support and from related health measures. They are reliable (all Alphas greater than 0.91), and are fairly stable over time. Selected construct validity hypotheses were supported.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Controllability of Stressful Events and Satisfaction With Spouse Support Behaviors

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The List of Threatening Experiences: a subset of 12 life event categories with considerable long-term contextual threat.

              In a survey of a random sample of the general population recent life events, collected and rated for long-term contextual threat according to the methods of Brown & Harris (1978), were also recorded where possible on an inventory of life event categories (Tennant & Andrews, 1977). Of the 82.5% of all events collected which were covered by the inventory, 12 of the 67 event categories accounted for 77% of life events with an aetiologicaly significant rating of marked or moderate long-term threat. Where practical and economic constraints oblige research workers to choose the inventory method, a brief list of event categories, such as the List of Threatening Experiences, is recommended in preference to much longer lists.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                JMIR Res Protoc
                JMIR Res Protoc
                ResProt
                JMIR Research Protocols
                JMIR Publications (Toronto, Canada )
                1929-0748
                December 2017
                18 December 2017
                : 6
                : 12
                : e231
                Affiliations
                [1] 1 National Institute for Health Research: Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care East Midlands University of Nottingham Nottingham United Kingdom
                [2] 2 Division of Rehabilitation and Ageing School of Medicine University of Nottingham Nottingham United Kingdom
                [3] 3 Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust Institute of Mental Health Nottingham United Kingdom
                [4] 4 National Institute for Health Research: MindTech Healthcare Technology Co-operative Institute of Mental Health Triumph Road Nottingham United Kingdom
                [5] 5 Centre for Academic Mental Health School of Social & Community Medicine University of Bristol Bristol United Kingdom
                [6] 6 Division of Primary Care School of Medicine University of Nottingham Nottingham United Kingdom
                [7] 7 Division of Epidemiology & Public Health School of Medicine University of Nottingham Nottingham United Kingdom
                Author notes
                Corresponding Author: Richard K Morriss richard.morriss@ 123456nottingham.ac.uk
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3353-4108
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7481-693X
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9940-909X
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9621-0699
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8333-3094
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1844-705X
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0408-7898
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9257-8699
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5105-2634
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1083-6744
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7591-4438
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6404-8658
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6296-6677
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2910-4121
                Article
                v6i12e231
                10.2196/resprot.8061
                5748474
                29254909
                8613665a-3c12-483b-bea7-2750f8958407
                ©Catherine J Kaylor-Hughes, Mat Rawsthorne, Neil S Coulson, Sandra Simpson, Lucy Simons, Boliang Guo, Marilyn James, Paul Moran, Jayne Simpson, Chris Hollis, Anthony J Avery, Laila J Tata, Laura Williams, REBOOT Notts Lived Experience Advisory Panel, Richard K Morriss. Originally published in JMIR Research Protocols (http://www.researchprotocols.org), 18.12.2017.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Research Protocols, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://www.researchprotocols.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.

                History
                : 19 May 2017
                : 13 July 2017
                : 10 August 2017
                : 21 August 2017
                Categories
                Protocol
                Protocol

                depression,anxiety,peer support,online,self-management
                depression, anxiety, peer support, online, self-management

                Comments

                Comment on this article