6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Preliminary Evidence of Orthostatic Intolerance and Altered Cerebral Vascular Control Following Sport-Related Concussion

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Concussions have been shown to result in autonomic dysfunction and altered cerebral vascular function. We tested the hypothesis that concussed athletes (CA) would have altered cerebral vascular function during acute decreases and increases in blood pressure compared to healthy controls (HC). Ten CA (age: 20 ± 2 y, 7 females) and 10 HC (age: 21 ± 2 y, 6 females) completed 5 min of lower body negative pressure (LBNP; −40 mmHg) and 5 min of lower body positive pressure (LBPP; 20 mmHg). Protocols were randomized and separated by 10 min. Mean arterial pressure (MAP) and middle cerebral artery blood velocity (MCAv) were continuously recorded. Cerebral vascular resistance (CVR) was calculated as MAP/MCAv. Values are reported as change from baseline to the last minute achieved (LBNP) or 5 min (LBPP). There were no differences in baseline values between groups. During LBNP, there were no differences in the change for MAP (CA: −23 ± 18 vs. HC: −21 ± 17 cm/s; P = 0.80) or MCAv (CA: −13 ± 8 vs. HC: −18 ± 9 cm/s; P = 0.19). The change in CVR was different between groups (CA: −0.08 ± 0.26 vs. HC: 0.18 ± 0.24 mmHg/cm/s; P = 0.04). Total LBNP time was lower for CA (204 ± 92 s) vs. HC (297 ± 64 s; P = 0.04). During LBPP, the change in MAP was not different between groups (CA: 13 ± 6 vs. HC: 10 ± 7 mmHg; P = 0.32). The change in MCAv (CA: 7 ± 6 vs. HC: −4 ± 13 cm/s; P = 0.04) and CVR (CA: −0.06 ± 0.27 vs. HC: 0.38 ± 0.41 mmHg/cm/s; P = 0.03) were different between groups. CA exhibited impaired tolerance to LBNP and had a different cerebral vascular response to LBPP compared to HC.

          Related collections

          Most cited references72

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Computation of aortic flow from pressure in humans using a nonlinear, three-element model.

          We computed aortic flow pulsations from arterial pressure by simulating a nonlinear, time-varying three-element model of aortic input impedance. The model elements represent aortic characteristic impedance, arterial compliance, and systemic vascular resistance. Parameter values for the first two elements were computed from a published, age-dependent, aortic pressure-area relationship (G. J. Langewouters et al. J. Biomech. 17:425-435, 1984). Peripheral resistance was predicted from mean pressure and model mean flow. Model flow pulsations from aortic pressure showed the visual aspects of an aortic flow curve. For evaluation we compared model mean flow from radial arterial pressure with thermodilution cardiac output estimations, 76 times, in eight open heart surgical patients. The pooled mean difference was +7%, the SD 22%. After using one comparison per patient to calibrate the model, however, we followed quantitative changes in cardiac output that occurred either during changes in the state of the patient or subsequent to vasoactive drugs. The mean deviation from thermodilution cardiac output was +2%, the SD 8%. Given these small errors the method could monitor cardiac output continuously.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Regional brain blood flow in man during acute changes in arterial blood gases.

            Despite the importance of blood flow on brainstem control of respiratory and autonomic function, little is known about regional cerebral blood flow (CBF) during changes in arterial blood gases.We quantified: (1) anterior and posterior CBF and reactivity through a wide range of steady-state changes in the partial pressures of CO2 (PaCO2) and O2 (PaO2) in arterial blood, and (2) determined if the internal carotid artery (ICA) and vertebral artery (VA) change diameter through the same range.We used near-concurrent vascular ultrasound measures of flow through the ICA and VA, and blood velocity in their downstream arteries (the middle (MCA) and posterior (PCA) cerebral arteries). Part A (n =16) examined iso-oxic changes in PaCO2, consisting of three hypocapnic stages (PaCO2 =∼15, ∼20 and ∼30 mmHg) and four hypercapnic stages (PaCO2 =∼50, ∼55, ∼60 and ∼65 mmHg). In Part B (n =10), during isocapnia, PaO2 was decreased to ∼60, ∼44, and ∼35 mmHg and increased to ∼320 mmHg and ∼430 mmHg. Stages lasted ∼15 min. Intra-arterial pressure was measured continuously; arterial blood gases were sampled at the end of each stage. There were three principal findings. (1) Regional reactivity: the VA reactivity to hypocapnia was larger than the ICA, MCA and PCA; hypercapnic reactivity was similar.With profound hypoxia (35 mmHg) the relative increase in VA flow was 50% greater than the other vessels. (2) Neck vessel diameters: changes in diameter (∼25%) of the ICA was positively related to changes in PaCO2 (R2, 0.63±0.26; P<0.05); VA diameter was unaltered in response to changed PaCO2 but yielded a diameter increase of +9% with severe hypoxia. (3) Intra- vs. extra-cerebral measures: MCA and PCA blood velocities yielded smaller reactivities and estimates of flow than VA and ICA flow. The findings respectively indicate: (1) disparate blood flow regulation to the brainstem and cortex; (2) cerebrovascular resistance is not solely modulated at the level of the arteriolar pial vessels; and (3) transcranial Doppler ultrasound may underestimate measurements of CBF during extreme hypoxia and/or hypercapnia.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Transfer function analysis of dynamic cerebral autoregulation: A white paper from the International Cerebral Autoregulation Research Network.

              Cerebral autoregulation is the intrinsic ability of the brain to maintain adequate cerebral perfusion in the presence of blood pressure changes. A large number of methods to assess the quality of cerebral autoregulation have been proposed over the last 30 years. However, no single method has been universally accepted as a gold standard. Therefore, the choice of which method to employ to quantify cerebral autoregulation remains a matter of personal choice. Nevertheless, given the concept that cerebral autoregulation represents the dynamic relationship between blood pressure (stimulus or input) and cerebral blood flow (response or output), transfer function analysis became the most popular approach adopted in studies based on spontaneous fluctuations of blood pressure. Despite its sound theoretical background, the literature shows considerable variation in implementation of transfer function analysis in practice, which has limited comparisons between studies and hindered progress towards clinical application. Therefore, the purpose of the present white paper is to improve standardisation of parameters and settings adopted for application of transfer function analysis in studies of dynamic cerebral autoregulation. The development of these recommendations was initiated by (but not confined to) theCerebral Autoregulation Research Network(CARNet -www.car-net.org).
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Neurol
                Front Neurol
                Front. Neurol.
                Frontiers in Neurology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-2295
                09 April 2021
                2021
                : 12
                : 620757
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Center for Research and Education in Special Environments, Department of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, School of Public Health and Health Professions, University at Buffalo , Buffalo, NY, United States
                [2] 2Human Integrative Physiology Laboratory, Department of Kinesiology, School of Public Health, Indiana University , Bloomington, IN, United States
                [3] 3Department of Psychiatry, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo , Buffalo, NY, United States
                [4] 4UBMD Department of Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, University at Buffalo , Buffalo, NY, United States
                Author notes

                Edited by: Ramon Diaz-Arrastia, University of Pennsylvania, United States

                Reviewed by: Alexa Walter, University of Pennsylvania, United States; Anthony P. Kontos, University of Pittsburgh, United States

                *Correspondence: Blair D. Johnson bj33@ 123456indiana.edu

                This article was submitted to Neurotrauma, a section of the journal Frontiers in Neurology

                Article
                10.3389/fneur.2021.620757
                8062862
                865f47b9-e0b2-478b-ae0f-849bf1b396e8
                Copyright © 2021 Worley, O'Leary, Sackett, Schlader, Willer, Leddy and Johnson.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 23 October 2020
                : 08 March 2021
                Page count
                Figures: 9, Tables: 1, Equations: 0, References: 78, Pages: 13, Words: 8707
                Funding
                Funded by: National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences 10.13039/100006108
                Award ID: UL1TR001412
                Funded by: National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke 10.13039/100000065
                Categories
                Neurology
                Original Research

                Neurology
                mild traumatic brain injury,cerebral blood flow,blood pressure,baroreflex,autonomic function

                Comments

                Comment on this article