8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      The supramodal brain: implications for auditory perception

      , ,
      Journal of Cognitive Psychology
      Informa UK Limited

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references153

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Illusions. What you see is what you hear.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Visual speech speeds up the neural processing of auditory speech.

            Synchronous presentation of stimuli to the auditory and visual systems can modify the formation of a percept in either modality. For example, perception of auditory speech is improved when the speaker's facial articulatory movements are visible. Neural convergence onto multisensory sites exhibiting supra-additivity has been proposed as the principal mechanism for integration. Recent findings, however, have suggested that putative sensory-specific cortices are responsive to inputs presented through a different modality. Consequently, when and where audiovisual representations emerge remain unsettled. In combined psychophysical and electroencephalography experiments we show that visual speech speeds up the cortical processing of auditory signals early (within 100 ms of signal onset). The auditory-visual interaction is reflected as an articulator-specific temporal facilitation (as well as a nonspecific amplitude reduction). The latency facilitation systematically depends on the degree to which the visual signal predicts possible auditory targets. The observed auditory-visual data support the view that there exist abstract internal representations that constrain the analysis of subsequent speech inputs. This is evidence for the existence of an "analysis-by-synthesis" mechanism in auditory-visual speech perception.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Cross-modal plasticity in specific auditory cortices underlies visual compensations in the deaf.

              When the brain is deprived of input from one sensory modality, it often compensates with supranormal performance in one or more of the intact sensory systems. In the absence of acoustic input, it has been proposed that cross-modal reorganization of deaf auditory cortex may provide the neural substrate mediating compensatory visual function. We tested this hypothesis using a battery of visual psychophysical tasks and found that congenitally deaf cats, compared with hearing cats, have superior localization in the peripheral field and lower visual movement detection thresholds. In the deaf cats, reversible deactivation of posterior auditory cortex selectively eliminated superior visual localization abilities, whereas deactivation of the dorsal auditory cortex eliminated superior visual motion detection. Our results indicate that enhanced visual performance in the deaf is caused by cross-modal reorganization of deaf auditory cortex and it is possible to localize individual visual functions in discrete portions of reorganized auditory cortex.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Journal of Cognitive Psychology
                Journal of Cognitive Psychology
                Informa UK Limited
                2044-5911
                2044-592X
                November 08 2016
                January 02 2017
                May 13 2016
                January 02 2017
                : 29
                : 1
                : 65-87
                Article
                10.1080/20445911.2016.1181691
                867822af-0fe6-4506-83ad-df556808ff63
                © 2017
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article