11
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Nivolumab (NIVO) + ipilimumab (IPI) + 2 cycles of platinum-doublet chemotherapy (chemo) vs 4 cycles chemo as first-line (1L) treatment (tx) for stage IV/recurrent non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): CheckMate 9LA.

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          9501

          Background: NIVO + IPI was shown to improve overall survival (OS) and durability of response vs chemo in 1L advanced NSCLC in CheckMate 227 Part 1, regardless of PD-L1 expression. We hypothesized that a limited course of chemo combined with NIVO + IPI could provide rapid disease control while building on the durable OS benefit seen with dual PD-1 and CTLA-4 inhibition. CheckMate 9LA (NCT03215706) is a phase 3 randomized study evaluating NIVO + IPI + 2 cycles chemo vs chemo in 1L stage IV/recurrent NSCLC. Methods: Adults with tx-naive, histologically confirmed stage IV/recurrent NSCLC, ECOG performance status 0–1, and no known sensitizing EGFR/ALK alterations were randomized 1:1 to NIVO 360 mg Q3W + IPI 1 mg/kg Q6W + chemo (2 cycles) (n = 361) or chemo (4 cycles) alone (n = 358), stratified by PD-L1 (< 1% vs ≥ 1%), sex, and histology (squamous vs non-squamous). Chemo was based on histology. Pts with non-squamous NSCLC in the chemo-only arm could receive optional pemetrexed maintenance. Pts were treated with immunotherapy until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or for 2 y. The primary endpoint was OS; the interim analysis using Lan–DeMets alpha spending function with O’Brien–Fleming boundary was planned at ~80% information fraction (ie, after observing ~322 total events). Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response rate (ORR) by blinded independent central review, and efficacy by PD-L1 subgroups. Exploratory endpoints included safety/tolerability. Results: Baseline characteristics were balanced across arms. At a preplanned interim analysis (minimum follow-up 8.1 mo), OS was significantly prolonged with NIVO + IPI + chemo vs chemo (HR 0.69, 96.71% CI: 0.55–0.87; P = 0.0006); statistically significant improvements in PFS and ORR were seen. With longer follow-up (minimum 12.7 mo), NIVO + IPI + chemo vs chemo continued to provide longer OS; median 15.6 vs 10.9 mo (HR 0.66, 95% CI: 0.55–0.80); 1-y OS rates were 63 vs 47%. Clinical benefit was consistent across all efficacy measures in key subgroups including by PD-L1 and histology. Grade 3–4 tx-related adverse events were reported in 47 vs 38% of pts in the NIVO + IPI + chemo vs chemo arms, respectively. Conclusions: CheckMate 9LA met its primary endpoint: a statistically significant improvement in OS was observed with NIVO + NSCLC-optimized IPI + a limited course of chemo vs chemo (4 cycles) in 1L advanced NSCLC. No new safety signals were reported. Clinical trial information: NCT03215706 .

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Journal of Clinical Oncology
          JCO
          American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
          0732-183X
          1527-7755
          May 20 2020
          May 20 2020
          : 38
          : 15_suppl
          : 9501
          Affiliations
          [1 ]Department of Thoracic Oncology, Airway Research Center North, German Center for Lung Research, LungClinic, Grosshansdorf, Germany;
          [2 ]Institutul Oncologic Prof. Dr. Ion Chiricuta and UMF Iuliu Hatieganu, Cluj-Napoca, Romania;
          [3 ]Hospital Carlos Haya de Málaga, Málaga, Spain;
          [4 ]SF. Nectarie Oncology Center, Craiova, Romania;
          [5 ]Ambulatorium Chemioterapii, Bydgoszcz, Poland;
          [6 ]Hospital Nossa Senhora Da Conceição, Porto Alegre, Brazil;
          [7 ]Instituto Oncologico de Córdoba, Córdoba, Argentina;
          [8 ]Thoracic Oncology Unit, University Hospital of Nantes, Nantes, France;
          [9 ]Vall d’Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain;
          [10 ]Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe, Valencia, Spain;
          [11 ]Institute of Oncology "Prof. Dr. Alexandru Trestioreanu" Bucha, Bucharest, Romania;
          [12 ]Department of Thoracic Oncology, Saitama Cancer Center, Saitama, Japan;
          [13 ]Regional University Hospital Center of Lille, Hospital Calmette, Lille, France;
          [14 ]Shanghai Lung Cancer Center, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China;
          [15 ]Austin Hospital, Victoria, Australia;
          [16 ]The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH;
          [17 ]Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ;
          [18 ]Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, CNIO, Universidad Complutense & CiberOnc, Madrid, Spain;
          Article
          10.1200/JCO.2020.38.15_suppl.9501
          868b837f-8e7c-4c4e-833b-46164ed417da
          © 2020
          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article