13
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Effect of low frequency transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation of TE5 (waiguan) and PC6 (neiguan) acupoints on cold-induced pain

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          [Purpose] This study assesse the effect of low frequency transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) of theTE5 (waiguan) and PC6 (neiguan) acupoints on cold-induced pain. [Subjects and Methods] Forty-eight subjects were divided by convenience into three groups: TENS with electrodes of 1 cm 2 area, TENS with electrodes of area 15 cm 2 and a placebo group. The study consisted of three phases: cold-induced pain without electroanalgesia, cold-induced pain with electroanalgesia or placebo, and cold-induced pain post-electroanalgesia or placebo. [Results] Acupuncture like TENS increased the pain threshold latency during treatment (45.7 ± 11.7s) compared to pre-treatment (30.9 ± 8.9s) in the TENS group with 1 cm 2 electrodes. In the TENS group with 15 cm 2 electrodes, the pain threshold latency increased at post-treatment (36.2 ± 12.9s) compared to pre-treatment (25.5 ± 7.4s). The placebo group showed no significant changes. The group with 1 cm 2 electrodes showed a significantly higher pain threshold latency (45.7 ± 11.7s) than the other two groups. At post-treatment, the pain threshold latencies of both the 1 cm 2 (39.4 ± 11.5s) and 15 cm 2 (36.2 ± 12.9s) TENS group were higher than that of the placebo group (22.4 ± 7.4s). [Conclusion] Acupuncture like TENS applied to PC6 and TE5 acupoints increased the pain threshold latency. The pain intensity was reduced by TENS with an electrode area of 1 cm 2.

          Related collections

          Most cited references19

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Blockade of opioid receptors in rostral ventral medulla prevents antihyperalgesia produced by transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS).

          Although transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) is used extensively in inflammatory joint conditions such as arthritis, the underlying mechanisms are unclear. This study aims to demonstrate an opiate-mediated activation of descending inhibitory pathways from the rostral ventral medulla (RVM) in the antihyperalgesia produced by low- (4 Hz) or high-frequency (100 Hz) TENS. Paw withdrawal latency to radiant heat, as an index of secondary hyperalgesia, was recorded before and after knee joint inflammation (induced by intra-articular injection of 3% kaolin and carrageenan) and after TENS/no TENS coadministered with naloxone (20 microg/1 microl), naltrindole (5 microg/1 microl), or vehicle (1 microl) microinjected into the RVM. The selectivity of naloxone and naltrindole doses was tested against the mu-opioid receptor agonist [D-Ala2,N-Me-Phe4,Gly-ol5]-enkephalin (DAMGO) (20 ng, 1 microl) and the delta2-opioid receptor agonist deltorphin (5 microg, 1 microl) in the RVM. Naloxone microinjection into the RVM blocks the antihyperalgesia produced by low frequency (p 0.05). In contrast, naltrindole injection into the RVM blocks the antihyperalgesia produced by high-frequency (p 0.05) TENS. The analgesia produced by DAMGO and deltorphin is selectively blocked by naloxone (p < 0.05) and naltrindole (p < 0.05), respectively. Thus, the dose of naloxone and naltrindole used in the current study blocks mu- and delta-opioid receptors, respectively. Hence, low-frequency and high-frequency TENS produces antihyperalgesia by activation of mu- and delta-opioid receptors, respectively, in the RVM.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Hypoalgesia in response to transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) depends on stimulation intensity.

            Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) is an electrophysical modality used for pain management. This study investigated the dose response of different TENS intensities on experimentally induced pressure pain. One hundred and thirty TENS naïve healthy individuals (18-64 years old; 65 males, 65 females) were randomly allocated to 5 groups (n = 26 per group): Strong Non Painful TENS; Sensory Threshold TENS; Below Sensory Threshold TENS; No Current Placebo TENS; and Transient Placebo TENS. Active TENS (80 Hz) was applied to the forearm for 30 minutes. Transient Placebo TENS was applied for 42 seconds after which the current amplitude automatically reset to 0 mA. Pressure pain thresholds (PPT) were recorded from 2 points on the hand and forearm before and after TENS to measure hypoalgesia. There were significant differences between groups at both the hand and forearm (ANOVA; P = .005 and .002). At 30 minutes, there was a significant hypoalgesic effect in the Strong Non Painful TENS group compared to: Below Sensory Threshold TENS, No Current Placebo TENS and Transient Placebo TENS groups (P < .0001) at the forearm; Transient Placebo TENS and No Current Placebo TENS groups at the hand (P = .001). There was no significant difference between Strong Non Painful TENS and Sensory Threshold TENS groups. The area under the curve for the changes in PPT significantly correlated with the current amplitude (r(2) = .33, P = .003). These data therefore show that there is a dose-response effect of TENS with the largest effect occurring with the highest current amplitudes. This study shows a dose response for the intensity of TENS for pain relief with the strongest intensities showing the greatest effect; thus, we suggest that TENS intensity should be titrated to achieve the strongest possible intensity to achieve maximum pain relief. Copyright © 2011 American Pain Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Analgesia induced by 2- or 100-Hz electroacupuncture in the rat tail-flick test depends on the activation of different descending pain inhibitory mechanisms.

              We evaluated the effectiveness of intrathecal antagonists of α1- (WB4101) and α2- (idazoxan) adrenoceptors and serotonergic (methysergide), opioid (naloxone), muscarinic (atropine), GABA(A) (bicuculline) and GABA(B) (phaclofen) receptors in blocking 2- or 100-Hz electroacupuncture (EA)-induced analgesia (EAIA) in the rat tail-flick test. EA was applied bilaterally to the Zusanli and Sanyinjiao acupoints in lightly anesthetized rats. EA increased tail-flick latency, where the effect of 2-Hz EA lasted longer than that produced by 100-Hz EA. The 2-Hz EAIA was inhibited by naloxone or atropine, was less intense and shorter after WB4101 or idazoxan, and was shorter after methysergide, bicuculline, or phaclofen. The 100-Hz EAIA was less intense and shorter after naloxone and atropine, less intense and longer after phaclofen, shorter after methysergide or bicuculline, and remained unchanged after WB4101 or idazoxan. We postulate that the intensity of the effect of 2-Hz EA depends on noradrenergic descending mechanisms and involves spinal opioid and muscarinic mechanisms, whereas the duration of the effect depends on both noradrenergic and serotonergic descending mechanisms, and involves spinal GABAergic modulation. In contrast, the intensity of 100-Hz EAIA involves spinal muscarinic, opioid, and GABA(B) mechanisms, while the duration of the effects depends on spinal serotonergic, muscarinic, opioid, and GABA(A) mechanisms. The results of this study indicate that 2- and 100-Hz EA induce analgesia in the rat tail-flick test activating different descending mechanisms at the spinal cord level that control the intensity and duration of the effect. The adequate pharmacological manipulation of such mechanisms may improve EA effectiveness for pain management. Copyright © 2011 American Pain Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Phys Ther Sci
                J Phys Ther Sci
                JPTS
                Journal of Physical Therapy Science
                The Society of Physical Therapy Science
                0915-5287
                2187-5626
                30 January 2016
                January 2016
                : 28
                : 1
                : 76-81
                Affiliations
                [1) ] Department of Physical Therapy, UFPE-Federal University of Pernambuco, Brazil
                [2) ] Graduate of Physical Therapy, UFPE-Federal University of Pernambuco, Brazil
                Author notes
                [* ]Corresponding author. Marcelo Renato Guerino, Department of Physical Therapy, UFPE-Federal University of Pernambuco: Recife, PE, Brazil. (E-mail: marceloguerino@ 123456hotmail.com )
                Article
                jpts-2015-697
                10.1589/jpts.28.76
                4755978
                26957732
                868fe928-11e6-402e-8fac-a46fbbdd9f9d
                2016©by the Society of Physical Therapy Science. Published by IPEC Inc.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives (by-nc-nd) License.

                History
                : 25 August 2015
                : 09 October 2015
                Categories
                Original Article

                tens,acupoints,pain
                tens, acupoints, pain

                Comments

                Comment on this article