5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Impact of social distancing on mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic: An urgent discussion

      letter

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Dear Editors, The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak has spread across all continents, causing major economic losses, reduced physical interaction and significant psychological distress (Remuzzi & Remuzzi, 2020). In a large-scale Chinese survey, high prevalence of depression and anxiety was detected during the pandemic (Qiu et al., 2020). Torales et al. (2020) have discussed the impact of the pandemic in mental health and provided information about previous experiences of epidemics and social isolation. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), social distancing represents an important strategy to prevent the increase in cases and deaths by COVID-19, leading to subsequent overburdening of the health care systems (Jacobson et al., 2020). Despite some evidence about the psychological impact of quarantine in previous situations, little is known about the consequences of social distancing for the hundreds of millions of people under lockdown in the current scenario (Brooks et al., 2020; Venkatesh & Edirappuli, 2020). A US study investigated more than 10 million Google searches and assessed the changes in mental health search queries after stay-at-home measures. Topics related to anxiety, negative thoughts, sleep disturbances, and suicidal ideation increased dramatically before stay-at-home orders with a levelling of the curve after implementation (Jacobson et al., 2020). A British online qualitative study with 27 participants assessed five focus groups during the early stages of the social distancing measures (5–12 days post lockdown). The isolation resulted in significant negative impacts on mental health and well-being within a short time of policy implementation, mainly in those with low-paid or precarious employment. Reduced social interaction, economic losses, and routine changes led to psychological and emotional impact, as demotivation, loss of meaning and decreased self-worth (Williams et al., 2020). Another research with 683 US adolescents carried out 2 weeks post lockdown showed that engagement in social distancing was not significantly associated with their mental health. However, specific motivations for social distancing were related to different mental problems. Youth whose motivation was to prevent illness or avoid judgements reported greater anxiety symptoms. Those who engaged in social distancing because a friend told them had more depressive symptoms (Oosterhoff et al., 2020). We believe that social isolation will probably increase fear, anxiety symptoms, loneliness, and depressed mood. Humans are social beings, independent of nationality or cultural background, and maintaining isolation for a long period might create significant psychological distress. The economic burden of the pandemic, with millions of jobs lost, increase in poverty and inequality might accentuate these feelings. This impact may be ever stronger in developing countries, for infected patients or those who live in nursing facilities, the homeless and people with mental disorders. Strategies like online social and psychological support, as well as calling friends and family members, may mitigate these feelings, but not end them. Discussing the psychological impact of this social isolation is necessary, since this is an unprecedented situation in recent human History, with almost no record of its consequences. To date, studies on this important topic are scarce and present significant biases. Given the magnitude of the pandemic and the number of people under lockdown, it is urgent to conduct more researches to clarify the effect of social distancing in short- and long-term mental health.

          Related collections

          Most cited references5

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          A nationwide survey of psychological distress among Chinese people in the COVID-19 epidemic: implications and policy recommendations

          The Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) epidemic emerged in Wuhan, China, spread nationwide and then onto half a dozen other countries between December 2019 and early 2020. The implementation of unprecedented strict quarantine measures in China has kept a large number of people in isolation and affected many aspects of people’s lives. It has also triggered a wide variety of psychological problems, such as panic disorder, anxiety and depression. This study is the first nationwide large-scale survey of psychological distress in the general population of China during the COVID-19 epidemic.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            COVID-19 and Italy: what next?

            Summary The spread of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has already taken on pandemic proportions, affecting over 100 countries in a matter of weeks. A global response to prepare health systems worldwide is imperative. Although containment measures in China have reduced new cases by more than 90%, this reduction is not the case elsewhere, and Italy has been particularly affected. There is now grave concern regarding the Italian national health system's capacity to effectively respond to the needs of patients who are infected and require intensive care for SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia. The percentage of patients in intensive care reported daily in Italy between March 1 and March 11, 2020, has consistently been between 9% and 11% of patients who are actively infected. The number of patients infected since Feb 21 in Italy closely follows an exponential trend. If this trend continues for 1 more week, there will be 30 000 infected patients. Intensive care units will then be at maximum capacity; up to 4000 hospital beds will be needed by mid-April, 2020. Our analysis might help political leaders and health authorities to allocate enough resources, including personnel, beds, and intensive care facilities, to manage the situation in the next few days and weeks. If the Italian outbreak follows a similar trend as in Hubei province, China, the number of newly infected patients could start to decrease within 3–4 days, departing from the exponential trend. However, this cannot currently be predicted because of differences between social distancing measures and the capacity to quickly build dedicated facilities in China.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The outbreak of COVID-19 coronavirus and its impact on global mental health

              The current outbreak of COVID-19 coronavirus infection among humans in Wuhan (China) and its spreading around the globe is heavily impacting on the global health and mental health. Despite all resources employed to counteract the spreading of the virus, additional global strategies are needed to handle the related mental health issues. Published articles concerning mental health related to the COVID-19 outbreak and other previous global infections have been considered and reviewed. This outbreak is leading to additional health problems such as stress, anxiety, depressive symptoms, insomnia, denial, anger and fear globally. Collective concerns influence daily behaviors, economy, prevention strategies and decision-making from policy makers, health organizations and medical centers, which can weaken strategies of COVID-19 control and lead to more morbidity and mental health needs at global level.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Int J Soc Psychiatry
                Int J Soc Psychiatry
                ISP
                spisp
                The International Journal of Social Psychiatry
                SAGE Publications (Sage UK: London, England )
                0020-7640
                1741-2854
                21 May 2020
                September 2020
                : 66
                : 6
                : 625-626
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Health Sciences Center, Universidade de Fortaleza, Fortaleza, Brazil
                [2 ]Hospital de Saúde Mental Professor Frota Pinto, Fortaleza, Brazil
                Author notes
                [*]Douglas de Sousa Soares, Hospital de Saúde Mental Professor Frota Pinto – Rua Vicente Nobre Macedo s/n, 60841-110 Fortaleza, Brazil. Email: douglas.sousa.soares@ 123456gmail.com
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8566-4639
                Article
                10.1177_0020764020927047
                10.1177/0020764020927047
                7405626
                32438880
                86b357c2-5c95-44c6-a4fe-b628f6539a99
                © The Author(s) 2020

                This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page ( https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).

                History
                Categories
                Letters to the Editor
                Custom metadata
                ts1

                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry

                Comments

                Comment on this article