35
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing in intensive care unit patients

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Aspiration in critically ill patients frequently causes severe co-morbidity. We evaluated a diagnostic protocol using routine FEES in critically ill patients at risk to develop aspiration following extubation. We instructed intensive care unit physicians on specific risk factors for and clinical signs of aspiration following extubation in critically ill patients and offered bedside FEES for such patients. Over a 45-month period, we were called to perform 913 endoscopic examinations in 553 patients. Silent aspiration or aspiration with acute symptoms (cough or gag reflex as the bolus passed into the trachea) was detected in 69.3% of all patients. Prolonged non-oral feeding via a naso-gastric tube was initiated in 49.7% of all patients. In 13.2% of patients, a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy was initiated as a result of FEES findings, and in 6.3% an additional tracheotomy to prevent aspiration had to be initiated. In 59 out of 258 patients (22.9%), tracheotomies were closed, and 30.7% of all 553 patients could be managed with the immediate onset of an oral diet and compensatory treatment procedures. Additional radiological examinations were not required. FEES in critically ill patients allows for a rapid evaluation of deglutition and for the immediate initiation of symptom-related rehabilitation or for an early resumption of oral feeding.

          Related collections

          Most cited references26

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Endoscopic and videofluoroscopic evaluations of swallowing and aspiration.

          A new procedure for evaluating oropharyngeal dysphagia utilizing fiberoptic laryngoscopy was compared to the videofluoroscopy procedure. Twenty-one subjects were given both examinations within a 48-hour period. Results of the fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) and videofluoroscopy examinations were compared for presence or absence of abnormal events. Good agreement was found, especially for the finding of aspiration (90% agreement). The FEES was then measured against the videofluoroscopy study for sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value. Sensitivity was 0.88 or greater for three of the four parameters measured. Specificity was lower overall, but was still 0.92 for detection of aspiration. It was concluded that the FEES is a valid and valuable tool for evaluating oropharyngeal dysphagia. Some specific patients and conditions that lend themselves to this procedure are discussed.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Fiberoptic endoscopic examination of swallowing safety: a new procedure.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Evaluation of oropharyngeal dysphagia: which diagnostic tool is superior?

              S Langmore (2003)
              As flexible endoscopic examinations of swallowing become more widely used to evaluate patients with oropharyngeal dysphagia, it is important to be aware of research regarding the efficacy of this procedure as compared with the videofluoroscopy procedure. A recent evidence-based review of the field threw some long-held findings into question and has stimulated a surge of new research studying the sensitivity of the two instrumental examinations, health outcomes of patients who receive each procedure, and a look at different patient outcomes. Since 1999, one quasi-randomized clinical trial has directly compared outcomes of patients given a fluoroscopy versus a fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) examination. This study showed no significant difference in pneumonia rates between the two groups of patients. A multitude of studies have shown a high level of agreement between the two instrumental examinations, and the use of the term gold standard as applied to fluoroscopy is no longer appropriate. The attempt to standardize each examination has been slow, and inter-judge reliability of results has come under fire. Several new scales for quality of life and functional status are now ready to be applied to research that can measure outcomes other than pneumonia. Research to date has suggested that both instrumental examinations are valuable. It is likely that both will continue to be used and will be seen as complementary rather than competitors.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                hans.eckel@kabeg.at
                Journal
                Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol
                European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology
                Springer-Verlag (Berlin/Heidelberg )
                0937-4477
                1434-4726
                30 October 2007
                April 2008
                : 265
                : 4
                : 441-446
                Affiliations
                Department of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Klagenfurt General Hospital, A.ö. Landeskrankenhaus Klagenfurt, HNO, St. Veiter Str. 47, 9027 Klagenfurt, Austria
                Article
                507
                10.1007/s00405-007-0507-6
                2254469
                17968575
                86f01c71-72a7-4309-9d18-acf049843cbe
                © Springer-Verlag 2007
                History
                : 10 May 2007
                : 11 October 2007
                Categories
                Laryngology
                Custom metadata
                © Springer-Verlag 2008

                Otolaryngology
                deglutition,swallowing,tracheotomy,rehabilitation,dysphagia,aspiration,laryngology,endoscopy
                Otolaryngology
                deglutition, swallowing, tracheotomy, rehabilitation, dysphagia, aspiration, laryngology, endoscopy

                Comments

                Comment on this article