14
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Highly Disturbed Populations of Seagrass Show Increased Resilience but Lower Genotypic Diversity

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The response of seagrass systems to a severe disturbance provides an opportunity to quantify the degree of resilience in different meadows, and subsequently to test whether there is a genetic basis to resilience. We used existing data on levels of long-standing disturbance from poor water quality, and the responses of seagrass ( Zostera muelleri) after an extreme flood event in Moreton Bay, Queensland, Australia. Sites were grouped into high and low disturbance categories, in which seagrass showed high and low resilience, respectively, as determined by measuring rates of key feedback processes (nutrient removal, suppression of sediment resuspension, and algal grazing), and physiological and morphological traits. Theoretically, meadows with higher genotypic diversity would be expected to have greater resilience. However, because the more resilient meadows occur in areas historically exposed to high disturbance, the alternative is also possible, that selection will have resulted in a narrower, less diverse subset of genotypes than in less disturbed meadows. Levels of genotypic and genetic diversity (allelic richness) based on 11 microsatellite loci, were positively related ( R 2 = 0.58). Genotypic diversity was significantly lower at highly disturbed sites ( R = 0.49) than at less disturbed sites ( R = 0.61). Genotypic diversity also showed a negative trend with two morphological characteristics known to confer resilience on seagrass in Moreton Bay, leaf chlorophyll concentrations and seagrass biomass. Genetic diversity did not differ between disturbed and undisturbed sites. We postulate that the explanation for these results is historical selection for genotypes that confer protection against disturbance, reducing diversity in meadows that contemporarily show greater resilience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references39

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Estimation of average heterozygosity and genetic distance from a small number of individuals.

          M Nei (1978)
          The magnitudes of the systematic biases involved in sample heterozygosity and sample genetic distances are evaluated, and formulae for obtaining unbiased estimates of average heterozygosity and genetic distance are developed. It is also shown that the number of individuals to be used for estimating average heterozygosity can be very small if a large number of loci are studied and the average heterozygosity is low. The number of individuals to be used for estimating genetic distance can also be very small if the genetic distance is large and the average heterozygosity of the two species compared is low.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Ecological consequences of genetic diversity.

            Understanding the ecological consequences of biodiversity is a fundamental challenge. Research on a key component of biodiversity, genetic diversity, has traditionally focused on its importance in evolutionary processes, but classical studies in evolutionary biology, agronomy and conservation biology indicate that genetic diversity might also have important ecological effects. Our review of the literature reveals significant effects of genetic diversity on ecological processes such as primary productivity, population recovery from disturbance, interspecific competition, community structure, and fluxes of energy and nutrients. Thus, genetic diversity can have important ecological consequences at the population, community and ecosystem levels, and in some cases the effects are comparable in magnitude to the effects of species diversity. However, it is not clear how widely these results apply in nature, as studies to date have been biased towards manipulations of plant clonal diversity, and little is known about the relative importance of genetic diversity vs. other factors that influence ecological processes of interest. Future studies should focus not only on documenting the presence of genetic diversity effects but also on identifying underlying mechanisms and predicting when such effects are likely to occur in nature.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Estimating the probability of identity among genotypes in natural populations: cautions and guidelines.

              Individual identification using DNA fingerprinting methods is emerging as a critical tool in conservation genetics and molecular ecology. Statistical methods that estimate the probability of sampling identical genotypes using theoretical equations generally assume random associations between alleles within and among loci. These calculations are probably inaccurate for many animal and plant populations due to population substructure. We evaluated the accuracy of a probability of identity (P(ID)) estimation by comparing the observed and expected P(ID), using large nuclear DNA microsatellite data sets from three endangered species: the grey wolf (Canis lupus), the brown bear (Ursus arctos), and the Australian northern hairy-nosed wombat (Lasiorinyus krefftii). The theoretical estimates of P(ID) were consistently lower than the observed P(ID), and can differ by as much as three orders of magnitude. To help researchers and managers avoid potential problems associated with this bias, we introduce an equation for P(ID) between sibs. This equation provides an estimator that can be used as a conservative upper bound for the probability of observing identical multilocus genotypes between two individuals sampled from a population. We suggest computing the actual observed P(ID) when possible and give general guidelines for the number of codominant and dominant marker loci required to achieve a reasonably low P(ID) (e.g. 0.01-0.0001).
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Plant Sci
                Front Plant Sci
                Front. Plant Sci.
                Frontiers in Plant Science
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-462X
                29 June 2018
                2018
                : 9
                : 894
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Australian Rivers Institute – Coast and Estuaries, School of Environment and Science, Griffith University , Southport, QLD, Australia
                [2] 2Centre for Integrative Ecology, School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Deakin University , Geelong, VIC, Australia
                [3] 3School of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Newcastle , Ourimbah, NSW, Australia
                [4] 4Healthy Land and Water , Brisbane, QLD, Australia
                [5] 5School of Science and Engineering, University of the Sunshine Coast , Maroochydore, QLD, Australia
                [6] 6Centre for Integrative Ecology, School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Deakin University , Geelong, VIC, Australia
                Author notes

                Edited by: Janne Alahuhta, University of Oulu, Finland

                Reviewed by: Susana Enríquez, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico; Charles Alan Jacoby, St. Johns River Water Management District, United States; Gabriele Procaccini, Stazione Zoologica Anton Dohrn, Italy

                *Correspondence: Rod M. Connolly, r.connolly@ 123456griffith.edu.au

                This article was submitted to Functional Plant Ecology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Plant Science

                Article
                10.3389/fpls.2018.00894
                6034141
                30008728
                86f4b9d7-9f5f-4900-837a-a3b076c5341d
                Copyright © 2018 Connolly, Smith, Maxwell, Olds, Macreadie and Sherman.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 13 August 2017
                : 07 June 2018
                Page count
                Figures: 5, Tables: 1, Equations: 0, References: 57, Pages: 9, Words: 0
                Categories
                Plant Science
                Original Research

                Plant science & Botany
                resilience,genotypic diversity,seagrass,zostera muelleri,disturbance
                Plant science & Botany
                resilience, genotypic diversity, seagrass, zostera muelleri, disturbance

                Comments

                Comment on this article