38
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      The vibratory innocent heart murmur in schoolchildren: difference in auscultatory findings between school medical officers and a pediatric cardiologist.

      Pediatric Radiology
      Adolescent, Cardiology, Case-Control Studies, Child, Child, Preschool, Heart Auscultation, Heart Murmurs, diagnosis, epidemiology, Humans, Observer Variation, Pediatrics, Phonocardiography, Prevalence, Reproducibility of Results, School Health Services

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          In 810 schoolchildren heart auscultation was performed by both a school medical officer (SMO) and a pediatric cardiologist (PC). The prevalence for a grade 1, 2, or 3 vibratory innocent heart murmur (VIHM), a grade 2 or 3 VIHM, and a grade 3 VIHM heard by the PC was 41%, 13%, and 1%, respectively. The SMO noted such murmurs in 26%, 9%, and 1%, respectively. In 30% of the cases in which the PC had noted a grade 2 or 3 VIHM, the SMO agreed; in 30% of such cases the SMO did not hear any heart murmur. If the PC heard a grade 2 or 3 VIHM phonocardiography was performed in a case-control study in which the controls did not have a heart murmur (94 pairs). In four children with a grade 2 or 3 VIHM no heart murmur could be registered and in three other children the murmur did not have the typical diamond shape. In contrast, in three children without a heart murmur at school a VIHM was seen on the phonocardiogram. In 26 children with a phonocardiographically proven grade 2 or 3 VIHM the SMO did not hear any heart murmur. One child with a grade 3 VIHM (both by the PC and SMO) had a minor subvalvular aortic stenosis. There is quite a difference in auscultatory detection of a venous hum: 9% (PC) and 2% (SMO). The prevalence of the pulmonary ejection murmur is identical at 4%. The carotid bruit is heard in 4% (PC) and 2% (SMO).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Comments

          Comment on this article