8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Program schemes with binary write-once arrays and the complexity classes they capture

      Preprint

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          We study a class of program schemes, NPSB, in which, aside from basic assignments, non-deterministic guessing and while loops, we have access to arrays; but where these arrays are binary write-once in that they are initialized to `zero' and can only ever be set to `one'. We show, amongst other results, that: NPSB can be realized as a vectorized Lindstrom logic; there are problems accepted by program schemes of NPSB that are not definable in the bounded-variable infinitary logic \({\cal L}^\omega_{\infty\omega}\); all problems accepted by the program schemes of NPSB have a zero-one law; and on ordered structures, NPSB captures the complexity class \([ L]^[{\scriptsize NP\normalsize}]\). The class of program schemes NPSB is actually the union of an infinite hierarchy of classes of program schemes. When we amend the semantics of our program schemes slightly, we find that the classes of the resulting hierarchy capture the complexity classes \(\Sigma^p_i\) (where \(i\geq 1\)) of the Polynomial Hierarchy PH. Finally, we give logical equivalences of the complexity-theoretic question `Does NP equal PSPACE?' where the logics (and classes of program schemes) involved define only problems with zero-one laws (and so do not define some computationally trivial problems).

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          03 December 2001
          Article
          cs/0112002
          8768e677-80e2-44fb-990e-d27ba355f59b
          History
          Custom metadata
          cs.LO cs.CC

          Comments

          Comment on this article