There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.
Abstract
Skeletal identification has a long tradition in both physical and forensic anthropology.
The process generally begins with formulation of a biological profile (osteobiography);
specifically, estimation of sex, age, ethnicity and stature. The present paper briefly
reviews a selection of the principal methods used for one aspect of the identification
process; the estimation of personal age. It is well-documented that variability in
the morphological features used to assess age in the human skeleton progressively
increases from birth to old age. Thus choice of method is inherently related to whether
unidentified remains are those of a juvenile or an adult. This review, therefore,
considers methods appropriate for age estimation in both juvenile and adult remains;
the former being primarily based on developmental, and the latter degenerative, morphological
features. Such a review is timely as new methods are constantly being developed, concurrent
with refinements to those already well established in mainstream anthropology.