ISUOG Interim Guidance on coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) during pregnancy and puerperium: information for healthcare professionals – an update

Abstract

In response to the World Health Organization (WHO) statements and international concerns regarding the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) outbreak, the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology (ISUOG) is issuing the following guidance for management during pregnancy and puerperium. Given the uncertainty regarding many aspects of the clinical course of COVID‐19 in pregnancy, frequently updated information may help obstetricians and ultrasound practitioners in counseling pregnant women and further improve our understanding of the pathophysiology of COVID‐19 in pregnancy. This statement, which is an update on our previous Interim Guidance 1 (Appendix S1), is not intended to replace other previously published interim guidance on evaluation and management of COVID‐19‐exposed pregnant women and should be considered in conjunction with relevant advice from organizations such as: American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG): https://www.acog.org/clinical-information/physician-faqs/covid-19-faqs-for-ob-gyns-obstetrics Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC): https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/hcp/inpatient-obstetric-healthcare-guidance.html European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC): https://www.ecdc.europa.eu Indicazioni ad interim della Societa Italiana di Neonatologia (SIN): https://www.sin-neonatologia.it/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/SIN.COVID19-10-maggio.V3-Indicazioni-1.pdf International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO): https://obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ijgo.13156 Ministry of Health, Brazil: https://www.conasems.org.br/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/guia_de_vigilancia_2020.pdf National Health Commission of the People's Republic of China: http://www.nhc.gov.cn Pan American Health Organization (PAHO): http://www.paho.org Perinatal Medicine Branch of Chinese Medical Association: https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/11hbxlPh317es1XtfWG2qg Public Health England: https://www.gov.uk/guidance/coronavirus-covid-19-information-for-the-public Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG): https://www.rcog.org.uk/en/guidelines-research-services/guidelines/coronavirus-pregnancy/ Santé Publique France: https://www.santepubliquefrance.fr/ Sociedad Española de Ginecología y Obstetricia (S.E.G.O.): https://mcusercontent.com/fbf1db3cf76a76d43c634a0e7/files/1abd1fa8-1a6f-409d-b622-c50e2b29eca9/RECOMENDACIONES_PARA_LA_PREVENCIO_N_DE_LA_INFECCIO_N_Y_EL_CONTROL_DE_LA_ENFERMEDAD_POR_CORONAVIRUS_2019_COVID_19_EN_LA_PACIENTE_OBSTE_TRICA.pdf Society for Maternal‐Fetal Medicine: https://www.smfm.org/covidclinical World Health Organization (WHO): https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019 BACKGROUND Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19), caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2), is a global public health emergency. Since the first case of COVID‐19 pneumonia was reported in Wuhan, Hubei Province, China, in December 2019, the infection has spread rapidly to the rest of China and beyond 2 , 3 . Coronaviruses are enveloped, non‐segmented, positive‐sense ribonucleic acid (RNA) viruses belonging to the family Coronaviridae, order Nidovirales 4 . The epidemics of the two β‐coronaviruses, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS‐CoV) and Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS‐CoV), have caused more than 10 000 cumulative cases in the past two decades, with mortality rates of 10% for SARS‐CoV and 37% for MERS‐CoV 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 . SARS‐CoV‐2 belongs to the same β‐coronavirus subgroup and it has genome similarity of about 80% and 50% with SARS‐CoV and MERS‐CoV, respectively 9 . SARS‐CoV‐2 is spread by respiratory droplets and direct contact (when body fluids of an infected person touch another person's eyes, nose or mouth, or an open cut, wound or abrasion). It should be noted that SARS‐CoV‐2 has been found in a laboratory environment to be viable on plastic and stainless‐steel surfaces for up to 72 h, whereas on copper and cardboard it is viable for up to 24 h 10 . SARS‐CoV‐2 also remains viable and infectious in aerosols for hours, raising the possibility of airborne transmission. The Report of the World Health Organization (WHO)‐China Joint Mission on Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID‐19) 11 estimated a high R 0 (reproduction number) of 2–2.5. The latest report from WHO 12 , on April 10th, estimated the global mortality rate of COVID‐19 to be 6.1%. However, other reports, which utilized appropriate adjustment for the case ascertainment rate and the time lag between onset of symptoms and death, suggested the mortality rate to be lower, at 1.4% 13 . Huang et al. 14 first reported on a cohort of 41 patients with laboratory‐confirmed COVID‐19 pneumonia. They described the epidemiological, clinical, laboratory and radiological characteristics, as well as treatment and clinical outcome of the patients. Subsequent studies with larger sample sizes have shown similar findings 15 , 16 . The most common symptoms reported are fever (88.5%) and cough (68.6%) 17 . Myalgia or fatigue (35.8%), expectoration (28.2%) and dyspnea (21.9%) are also reported 17 . Diarrhea (4.8%) and nausea and vomiting (3.9%) are less common 17 . Breslin et al. 18 observed similar COVID‐19 severity in pregnant patients (86.0% mild disease, 9.3% severe disease and 4.7% critical disease) to that reported in non‐pregnant patients 16 . On admission, ground‐glass opacity is the most common radiologic finding on computed tomography (CT) of the chest (56.4%) 16 . No radiographic or CT abnormality was found in 157 of 877 (17.9%) patients with non‐severe disease and in five of 173 (2.9%) patients with severe disease. Lymphocytopenia was reported to be present in 64.5% of patients on admission 17 . Elevated C‐reactive protein and lactic dehydrogenase were observed in 44.3% and 28.3% of patients, respectively. Breslin et al. screened asymptomatic pregnant patients admitted to the labor ward, and found that 32.6% of them tested positive; however, 71.4% of these patients developed symptoms during admission or early postpartum 18 . Universal testing for COVID‐19 remains a topic of debate and its need is determined mainly by local protocol and prevalence of the disease. A recent study from New York, USA, reported that a relatively large proportion (13.5%) of patients without any symptoms admitted for delivery tested positive for SARS‐CoV‐2 19 . Of these patients, 10% developed fever before discharge from the hospital. This indicates the potential problem with triaging patients based merely on symptoms in areas with widespread community infection. Pregnancy is a physiological state that predisposes women to respiratory complications of viral infection. Due to the physiological changes in their immune and cardiopulmonary systems, pregnant women are more likely to develop severe illness after infection with respiratory viruses 20 . In 2009, pregnant women accounted for 1% of patients infected with influenza A subtype H1N1 virus, but they accounted for 5% of H1N1‐related deaths 21 . In addition, SARS‐CoV and MERS‐CoV are both known to be responsible for severe complications during pregnancy, including the need for endotracheal intubation, admission to an intensive care unit (ICU), renal failure and death 8 , 22 . The case fatality rate of SARS‐CoV infection among pregnant women is up to 25% 8 . Currently, however, there is no evidence that pregnant women are more susceptible to SARS‐CoV‐2 or that those with COVID‐19 are more prone to developing severe pneumonia 18 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 . Over and above the impact of COVID‐19 on a pregnant woman, there are concerns relating to the potential effect on fetal and neonatal outcome; therefore, pregnant women require special attention in relation to prevention, diagnosis and management. Based on the limited information available as yet and our knowledge of other similar viral pulmonary infections, the following expert opinions are offered to guide clinical management. DIAGNOSIS OF INFECTION AND CLINICAL CLASSIFICATION Case definitions are those included in the WHO's interim guidance, ‘Global surveillance for COVID‐19 caused by human infection with COVID‐19 virus’ 29 . Suspected case A patient with acute respiratory illness (fever and at least one sign/symptom of respiratory disease (e.g. cough, shortness of breath)) AND a history of travel to or residence in a location reporting community transmission of COVID‐19 during the 14 days prior to symptom onset; OR A patient with any acute respiratory illness AND who has been in contact (see definition of contact below) with a confirmed or probable COVID‐19 case in the last 14 days prior to symptom onset; OR A patient with severe acute respiratory illness (fever and at least one sign/symptom of respiratory disease (e.g. cough, shortness of breath)) AND who requires hospitalization AND in the absence of an alternative diagnosis that fully explains the clinical presentation. A contact is defined as a person who experienced any one of the following exposures during the 2 days before and the 14 days after the onset of symptoms of a probable or confirmed COVID‐19 case: Face‐to‐face contact with a probable or confirmed case, within 1 m and for more than 15 min; Direct physical contact with a probable or confirmed case; Direct care for a patient with probable or confirmed COVID‐19, without using proper personal protective equipment (PPE); Other situations as indicated by local risk assessments. Note: for confirmed asymptomatic cases, the period of contact is measured from 2 days before to 14 days after the date on which the sample that led to confirmation was taken. Probable case A suspected case for which laboratory testing for COVID‐19 is inconclusive; OR A suspected case for which testing could not be performed, for any reason. Confirmed case A person with laboratory confirmation of COVID‐19, irrespective of clinical signs and symptoms. Evidence suggests that a proportion of transmissions occur from cases with no or mild symptoms that do not provoke healthcare‐seeking behavior 30 . Under these circumstances, in areas in which local transmission occurs, an increasing number of cases without a defined chain of transmission is observed and a lower threshold for suspicion in patients with severe acute respiratory infection may be recommended by health authorities 31 . Any suspected case should be tested for SARS‐CoV‐2 using available molecular tests, such as quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT‐PCR). Lower‐respiratory‐tract specimens likely have a higher diagnostic value compared with upper‐respiratory‐tract specimens for detecting SARS‐CoV‐2. The WHO recommends that, if possible, lower‐respiratory‐tract specimens, such as sputum, endotracheal aspirate or bronchoalveolar lavage, be collected for SARS‐CoV‐2 testing 32 . If patients do not have signs or symptoms of lower‐respiratory‐tract disease or specimen collection for lower‐respiratory‐tract disease is clinically indicated but collection is not possible, upper‐respiratory‐tract specimens of combined nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal swabs should be collected. If initial testing is negative in a patient who is strongly suspected of having COVID‐19, the patient should be resampled, with a sampling time interval of at least 1 day, and specimens collected from multiple respiratory‐tract sites (nose, sputum, endotracheal aspirate). Additional specimens, such as blood, urine and stool, may be collected to monitor the presence of virus and the shedding of virus from different body compartments. When qRT‐PCR analysis is negative for two consecutive tests, COVID‐19 can be ruled out. The WHO has provided guidance on the rational use of PPE for COVID‐19 33 . When conducting aerosol‐generating procedures (e.g. tracheal intubation, non‐invasive ventilation, cardiopulmonary resuscitation, manual ventilation before intubation), healthcare workers are advised to use respirators (e.g. fit‐tested N95, FFP2 or equivalent standard) with their PPE 33 , 34 . The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) additionally considers procedures that are likely to induce coughing (e.g. sputum induction, collection of nasopharyngeal swabs and suctioning) as aerosol‐generating procedures and CDC guidance includes the option of using a powered air‐purifying respirator 34 , 35 . CHEST IMAGING DURING PREGNANCY Computed tomography (CT) Chest imaging, especially CT scan, is essential for evaluation of the clinical condition of a pregnant woman with COVID‐19 36 , 37 , 38 . Fetal growth restriction (FGR), microcephaly and intellectual disability are the most common adverse effects from high‐dose (> 610 mGy) radiation exposure 39 , 40 . According to the American College of Radiology and American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, when a pregnant woman undergoes a single chest X‐ray examination, the radiation dose to the fetus is 0.0005–0.01 mGy, which is negligible, while the radiation dose to the fetus is 0.01–0.66 mGy from a single chest CT scan or CT pulmonary angiogram 41 , 42 , 43 . Chest CT scanning has high sensitivity (97%) for diagnosis of COVID‐19 38 . In a pregnant woman with suspected COVID‐19, a chest CT scan may be considered as a primary tool for the detection of COVID‐19 in epidemic areas 38 . Informed consent should be acquired (shared decision‐making) and a radiation shield applied over the gravid uterus. Because of the logistics involved in performing a CT scan on critically ill patients, and the need for thorough cleaning of the CT unit after imaging a COVID‐19 patient, a portable chest X‐ray is an acceptable alternative to a CT scan. A CT pulmonary angiogram is generally used in preference to a ventilation/perfusion scan on clinical suspicion of pulmonary embolus and should not be withheld during pregnancy. Ultrasound During the COVID‐19 pandemic, it has been proposed that ultrasound examination of the lungs of a pregnant woman with suspected COVID‐19 could be carried out at the same time as the obstetric scan, in order to minimize the risk of radiation as well as streamline the clinical assessment of these patients. This mode of lung imaging could also be considered when chest X‐ray and CT scan are not available. However, management should be determined by the clinical features and severity of the disease, and not be based merely on diagnostic imaging. A practical guide on how to perform lung ultrasound examination in pregnant women with suspected COVID‐19 was published recently 44 . In brief, the lung ultrasound scan can be performed using any type of machine and any type of transducer (including linear, convex and microconvex). Detailed guidance regarding cleaning of ultrasound equipment and transducers in the context of COVID‐19 has been provided in the article ‘ISUOG Safety Committee Position Statement on safe performance of obstetric and gynecological scans and equipment cleaning in context of COVID‐19’ 45 . On ultrasound, horizontal ‘A‐lines’ are the hallmark of the normal lung. When the lung loses normal aeration, but is not completely consolidated, it generates different shapes and lengths of vertical artifacts, usually called ‘B‐lines’. When the density of the peripheral lung parenchyma is increased, ultrasound examination shows a white area (the so‐called ‘ultrasonographic white lung’), in which neither A‐lines nor separated B‐lines are visible. Consolidation appears as an irregular hypoechoic area, and pleural effusion appears anechoic. A videoclip and images demonstrating these findings can be found in the original article 44 . Following the obstetric abdominal ultrasound examination, with the patient in a supine position, the examiner can simply move the probe from the abdomen to the chest, scanning the anterior and lateral areas of the thorax. The examination should cover the whole pulmonary area, from basal to upper areas of the thorax. Four vertical lines (right mid‐axillary line, right parasternal line, left parasternal line and left mid‐axillary line) can be followed in order to perform a systematic examination. With the patient in a sitting or lateral position, the posterior paravertebral surface of the thorax should then be scanned, from basal to upper areas or along posterior‐axillary lines according to the patient's position. TREATMENT DURING PREGNANCY Triage of patients Refer to Appendix 1. Triage of pregnant patients who potentially have COVID‐19 is of great importance in order to reduce the risk of exposure for patients and healthcare workers alike 23 . Setting up a triage station outside the obstetric ward and outpatient clinic is essential, allowing for systematic and thorough screening (Appendix 2) for symptoms (e.g. fever, cough, sore throat) and risk factors (based on travel history, occupation, contact and cluster (TOCC)). Temperature should be checked. When concern is raised about a potential COVID‐19 patient, i.e. due to symptoms and/or TOCC risk factors, a surgical facemask should be put on the patient and she should be separated from other patients, preferably in an isolated COVID‐19 unit. Healthcare workers should don appropriate PPE for the management of pregnant women with suspected/probable/confirmed COVID‐19 33 , 45 , 46 . Place of care Refer to Appendix 3. Suspected, probable and confirmed cases of COVID‐19 should ideally be managed by designated tertiary hospitals with effective isolation facilities and protection equipment 47 . Suspected/probable cases should be treated in isolation and confirmed cases should be managed in a negative‐pressure isolation room, when available; otherwise, designated COVID‐19 units can help reduce spread by cohorting affected patients with dedicated staffing. Designated hospitals should set up a dedicated operating room and a neonatal isolation ward. Ideally, the operating room and neonatal isolation ward should have negative‐pressure ventilation. When it is not possible to set up negative‐pressure ventilation for operating rooms, it is advisable to discuss with the hospital engineer whether it is appropriate to switch off their positive‐pressure ventilation. All attending medical staff should don PPE (fit‐tested N95, FFP2 or equivalent‐standard respirator, eye protection (goggles and/or face shield), disposable fluid‐resistant and impermeable protective gown and double gloves) when providing care for confirmed cases of COVID‐19 33 , 35 , 48 . However, in areas with widespread local transmission of the disease, health services may be unable to provide such levels of care to all suspected, probable or confirmed COVID‐19 cases. Pregnant women with a mild clinical presentation may not initially require hospital admission, and home confinement can be considered, provided that this is possible logistically and that monitoring of the woman's condition can be ensured 49 . If negative‐pressure isolation rooms are not available, patients should be isolated in single rooms, or grouped together once COVID‐19 has been confirmed. For transfer of confirmed cases, the attending medical team should don PPE and keep themselves and their patient a minimum distance of 2 m, or 6 feet, from any individuals without PPE. Referral to intensive care unit (ICU) When an inpatient has confirmed COVID‐19, vigilant maternal monitoring (including oxygen saturation monitoring) is of paramount importance, allowing for rapid initiation of supportive care 23 . Although not yet validated in COVID‐19 pregnant patients, a modified early obstetric warning score (MEOWS) can be used to enable early recognition of critical illness 50 , 51 . An adapted MEOWS chart is provided in Appendix 4. When the maternal condition requires additional care, this should not be withheld due to pregnancy. Respiratory indications for transfer to an isolated negative‐pressure room in the ICU include pulmonary edema, need for airway protection and necessity of mechanical ventilation 50 . Patients with hypoxemic respiratory failure should be admitted to the ICU as soon as possible. Multidisciplinary care (obstetricians, maternal–fetal‐medicine subspecialists, intensivists, obstetric anesthetists, internal‐medicine or respiratory physicians, midwives, virologists, microbiologists, neonatologists, infectious‐disease specialists) is essential, particularly because some pregnancy‐related diseases can cause findings similar to those of severe COVID‐19 (e.g. pulmonary embolism) and because the physiologic changes of pregnancy may affect management (e.g. optimal maternal positioning, changes in respiratory physiology affecting appropriate ventilator settings). Suspected/probable cases General treatment Particular attention should be paid to fluid and electrolyte balance. Symptoms should be treated, for example with antipyretic medicines. Surveillance Maternal vital signs (preferably using MEOWS) and oxygen saturation level should be monitored vigilantly to minimize maternal hypoxia. Arterial blood‐gas analysis should be conducted. Repeat chest imaging (when indicated) should be performed. Complete blood count should be evaluated regularly, with renal‐ and liver‐function testing and coagulation testing. Confirmed cases Non‐severe disease (1) The approach to symptomatic treatment and surveillance is the same as for suspected/probable cases. Conservative fluid administration is advised 23 , 52 . Fluid balance should be evaluated regularly to minimize the risk of fluid overload 53 . Isotonic crystalloid fluid is the first choice of fluid to be administered. (2) Currently, there is no proven antiviral treatment for COVID‐19 patients, although a number of drugs are being trialed therapeutically in patients with severe symptoms. Decisions regarding antiviral, antimalarial and antibiotic treatment should be undertaken in conjunction with local infectious‐disease experts, and with the obstetrician providing advice on potential maternal or fetal effects of any treatment regimen. A summary of potential treatments, including hydroxychloroquine, lopinavir/ritonavir, interferon β‐1b, tocilizumab, azithromycin and remdesivir, is provided in Appendix S2. (3) In non‐pregnant COVID‐19 patients, comorbidities such as hypertension or diabetes seem to increase the risk for progression to severe disease, with poorer clinical outcome 54 . Therefore, it is advisable to monitor closely pregnant patients with these comorbidities and to be aware of this increased risk. Severe and critical disease (1) The degree of severity of COVID‐19 pneumonia is defined by the Infectious Diseases Society of America/American Thoracic Society guidelines for community‐acquired pneumonia (Appendix S3) 55 , 56 . (2) Severe pneumonia is associated with a high maternal and perinatal mortality rate; there is, therefore, a requirement for aggressive treatment, including supporting measures with hydration, oxygen therapy and chest physiotherapy. The case should be managed in a negative‐pressure isolation room in the ICU, with the woman in a semi‐recumbent or prone position, if feasible. Support should be provided by a multidisciplinary team 57 . (3) Antibacterial treatment: appropriate antibiotic treatment in combination with antiviral treatment should be used promptly when there is suspected or confirmed secondary bacterial infection, following discussion with microbiologists. (4) Blood‐pressure monitoring and fluid‐balance management: in patients without septic shock, conservative fluid‐management measures should be undertaken 58 . Excessive fluid can worsen hypoxemia in severe disease without shock 23 , 52 . In patients with septic shock, fluid resuscitation and inotropes are required to maintain an average arterial pressure ≥ 65 mmHg and a lactate level < 2 mmol/L 23 , 50 . The Hour‐1 Surviving Sepsis Campaign bundle of care is a concise and practical approach to initial care for (suspected) sepsis 59 . This Bundle of Care is provided in Appendix S4. The WHO advises administration of 250–500 mL crystalloid intravenous fluid in the first 15–30 min, as a bolus 23 . (5) Oxygen therapy: supplemental oxygen should be used to maintain oxygen saturation > 94% 23 , 60 ; oxygen should be given promptly to patients with hypoxemia and/or shock, and the method of ventilation should be according to the patient's condition and following guidance from the intensivists and obstetric anesthetists 23 . Accelerated hypoxemia in pregnancy is possible, due to increased oxygen consumption and reduced functional residual capacity 51 . The intensivist should be aware of a higher likelihood of difficult intubation and greater risk of aspiration during pregnancy. (6) Medically indicated preterm delivery should be considered by the multidisciplinary team on a case‐by‐case basis. Early delivery may aid ventilation, allowing for prone ventilation if required. (7) Even in confirmed COVID‐19 patients, other causes for maternal collapse should be examined 51 . MANAGEMENT DURING PREGNANCY It has been reported that viral pneumonia in pregnant women is associated with an increased risk of preterm birth, FGR and perinatal mortality 61 . Based on nationwide population‐based data from Taiwan, it was demonstrated that pregnant women with viral pneumonia (n = 1462) had an increased risk of preterm birth, FGR and having a newborn with low birth weight and Apgar score < 7 at 5 min, compared with those without pneumonia (n = 7310) 62 . A case series of 12 pregnant women with SARS‐CoV in Hong Kong, China, reported three maternal deaths, that four of seven patients who presented in the first trimester had spontaneous miscarriage, four of five patients who presented after 24 weeks had preterm birth and two mothers recovered without delivery but their ongoing pregnancies were complicated by FGR 8 . Currently, there are limited data regarding the impact on the fetus of maternal SARS‐CoV‐2 infection. There is an apparent increase of iatrogenic preterm birth but not of spontaneous preterm birth; therefore, cervical‐length screening is not recommended. Fever is common in COVID‐19 patients. Previous data have demonstrated that maternal fever in early pregnancy can cause congenital structural abnormalities involving the neural tube, heart, kidney and other organs 63 , 64 , 65 . However, a study of 80 321 pregnant women reported that the rate of fever in early pregnancy was 10%, while the incidence of fetal malformation in this group was 3.7% 66 . Among the 77 344 viable pregnancies with data collected at 16–29 weeks of gestation, in the 8321 pregnant women with a reported temperature > 38°C lasting 1–4 days in early pregnancy, compared to those without a fever in early pregnancy, the overall risk of fetal malformation was not increased (odds ratio = 0.99 (95% CI, 0.88–1.12)) 66 . Previous studies have reported no evidence of congenital infection with SARS‐CoV, and currently there are no data on the risk of congenital malformation when SARS‐CoV‐2 infection is acquired during the first or early second trimester of pregnancy 67 . Outpatient antenatal care If appropriate, giving advice via telephone or videoconferencing to patients with suspected/probable/confirmed COVID‐19 can be considered 53 . When the patient has to be seen in hospital, early triage and isolation measures should be applied; all healthcare workers attending these patients should wear appropriate PPE 33 , 35 . Management in a negative‐pressure room is advised for confirmed cases. However, if this is not available, a dedicated single consultation room, from which any unnecessary equipment has been removed, is advised. Thorough disinfection between patients, according to local protocols, is essential, especially of high‐touch surfaces 45 , 52 . Inpatient antenatal care Hospital admission might be required for pregnant patients with suspected/probable/confirmed COVID‐19, either because of the disease itself or for obstetric reasons. A separate (part of the) obstetric ward should be reserved for these patients, preferably with negative‐pressure rooms for confirmed cases. This ward should use dedicated equipment, such as cardiotocography (CTG) or ultrasound machines 45 . This equipment should not be removed from the room/ward without appropriate disinfection. Prompt review by senior team members and, if necessary, multidisciplinary review, is advised for these patients 53 . Even if a patient is managed in an isolation ward, woman‐centered and skilled care with psychosocial support remains important 23 . Additionally, thromboprophylaxis must be considered for all pregnant women who are managed as inpatients, especially in those with severe disease, unless delivery is imminent (within 12 h) 23 , 51 , 53 . The Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists advises prophylactic low‐molecular‐weight heparin for all pregnant women admitted with COVID‐19, and this should also be considered in outpatient self‐isolating patients on a case‐by‐case basis, according to risk factors 53 . However, if the patient decompensates rapidly, a thorough risk–benefit analysis should be made regarding the administration of thromboprophylaxis, due to safety concerns regarding its use in conjunction with neuraxial analgesia. Fetal monitoring and ultrasound Following maternal assessment, CTG for fetal heart‐rate (FHR) monitoring, at an appropriate gestational age according to local practice, should be undertaken, as well as ultrasound assessment of fetal growth and amniotic fluid volume, with umbilical artery Doppler if necessary. In severe COVID‐19 cases, the fetal scan can be performed once the patient is stabilized. All sonographers/sonologists should don appropriate PPE when undertaking the ultrasound scan 35 . Adequate cleaning of ultrasound equipment and transducers should be performed before further use 45 . Pregnant women with confirmed SARS‐CoV‐2 infection who are asymptomatic, or recovering from mild illness, should be monitored with 4‐weekly ultrasound assessments of fetal growth and amniotic fluid volume, with umbilical artery Doppler if necessary 68 , 69 . When the infection is acquired in the first or early second trimester of pregnancy, a detailed morphology scan at 18–23 weeks of gestation is indicated, and these pregnancies should be monitored carefully after recovery. The pregnancy should be managed according to the clinical findings, regardless of the timing of infection during pregnancy. All clinical visits for obstetric emergencies should be carried out in agreement with current local guidelines. All routine follow‐up appointments should be postponed by 14 days or until positive test results (or two consecutive negative test results) are obtained. Recommendations on how to prioritize obstetric ultrasound services are provided in separate documents 68 , 70 . MANAGEMENT DURING CHILDBIRTH Refer to Appendix 3. COVID‐19 itself is not an indication for delivery, unless there is a need to improve maternal oxygenation. For suspected, probable and confirmed cases of COVID‐19, delivery should be conducted in a negative‐pressure isolation room whenever possible. The timing and mode of delivery should be individualized, dependent mainly on the clinical status of the patient, gestational age and fetal condition 53 . In the event that an infected woman has spontaneous onset of labor with optimal progress, she can be allowed to deliver vaginally 47 . Continuous fetal and frequent maternal monitoring is essential in these patients. Therefore, for optimum care as well as for the protection of the medical team, given evidence of presence of the virus in feces and the inability of healthcare workers to use adequate PPE during the delivery, water birth should be avoided 53 , 71 . Shortening the second stage by operative vaginal delivery can be considered, as active pushing while wearing a surgical mask may be difficult for the woman to achieve 72 . With respect to a pregnant woman without a diagnosis of COVID‐19, but who might be a silent carrier of the virus, we urge caution regarding the practice of active pushing while wearing a surgical mask, as it is unclear if there is an increased risk of exposure to any healthcare professional attending the delivery without PPE, because forceful exhalation may significantly reduce the effectiveness of a mask in preventing the spread of the virus by respiratory droplets 72 . During labor, excessive intravenous fluid should be avoided, especially when administering oxytocin, since this could worsen fluid overload due to its antidiuretic effect 73 . Oxytocin should be administered in an isotonic crystalloid such as 0.9% NaCl solution. Induction of labor can be considered when the cervix is favorable, but there should be a low threshold to expedite the delivery when there is fetal distress, poor progress in labor and/or deterioration in maternal condition. Septic shock, acute organ failure or fetal distress should prompt emergency Cesarean delivery (or termination, if legal, before fetal viability) 69 . Donning PPE is time‐consuming, and this may prolong the decision‐to‐delivery interval, but it is imperative. Women and their families should be informed about this possible delay, which may be of particular importance in Category‐1 Cesarean delivery. Both regional anesthesia and general anesthesia can be considered, depending on the clinical condition of the patient and after consultation with the obstetric anesthetist. As general anesthesia is considered an aerosol‐generating procedure, regional anesthesia is preferred. When appropriate, an early epidural should be considered for a laboring woman with confirmed COVID‐19. Concerning the presence of a birth‐partner during childbirth, we advise adherence to local protocols. It is advisable to give the asymptomatic birth‐partner a surgical facemask and they must follow strict hand hygiene 53 . However, when the partner is symptomatic, they must remain in isolation and therefore cannot attend the delivery. For preterm cases requiring delivery between 24 and 33 + 6 weeks of gestation, we urge caution regarding the use of antenatal steroids (dexamethasone or betamethasone) for fetal lung maturation in a critically ill patient, because this can potentially worsen her clinical condition and the administration of antenatal steroids might delay the delivery that is necessary for management of the patient, especially when there is a need to improve maternal oxygenation 74 . The use of antenatal steroids should be considered according to risk–benefit analysis and in discussion with infectious‐disease specialists, maternal–fetal‐medicine subspecialists and neonatologists 57 , 75 . We advise against the use of steroids in women at risk for late preterm delivery (between 34 and 36 weeks of gestation). Such risk–benefit analysis and discussion should likewise be applied to the use of tocolysis in women presenting with spontaneous preterm labor. Miscarried embryos/fetuses and placentae of COVID‐19 pregnant women should be treated as infectious tissues and should be disposed of appropriately. NEONATAL IMPACT AND CARE Risk of vertical transmission At present, it is uncertain whether there is a risk of vertical mother‐to‐baby transmission of SARS‐CoV‐2. In two studies, with a combined total of 10 pregnant women with COVID‐19 in the third trimester, amniotic fluid, cord blood and neonatal throat swab samples tested negative for SARS‐CoV‐2, suggesting there was no evidence of vertical transmission in women who developed COVID‐19 pneumonia in late pregnancy 26 , 76 . Furthermore, in the study by Qiu et al., vaginal secretion samples tested negative for SARS‐CoV‐2 RNA 77 . Notably, a neonate born to a pregnant woman with COVID‐19 tested positive for SARS‐CoV‐2 RNA in the pharyngeal swab sample 36 h after birth, but it was subsequently confirmed that qRT‐PCR testing of the placenta and cord blood was negative for SARS‐CoV‐2, suggesting that intrauterine vertical transmission might not have occurred 27 , 78 . Two studies recently explored the possibility of vertical transmission of SARS‐CoV‐2 in a combined total of seven affected pregnancies by testing for SARS‐CoV‐2‐specific antibodies (immunoglobulins G and M (IgG and IgM)) in neonatal serum samples 79 , 80 . Their conclusion, that SARS‐CoV‐2 could be transmitted in utero, was based on the presence of IgM antibodies, detected by recently developed automated chemiluminescence immunoassays, in blood drawn from three neonates following birth. However, for all three cases, the neonatal respiratory samples tested negative for SARS‐CoV‐2 RNA. In the study of Dong et al., the observed rapid decline (within 14 days) of anti‐SARS‐CoV‐2 IgG levels in the infant, along with a decline in IgM antibodies, strongly suggests that neonatal anti‐SARS‐CoV‐2 IgG antibodies were derived transplacentally from the mother, and not actively induced by the presumed neonatal infection 80 . In order to further investigate the possibility of vertical transmission of SARS‐CoV‐2, appropriately matched biological samples, including cord blood, placental tissue, amniotic fluid and amnion–chorion‐interface swab, should be collected immediately after delivery, using aseptic technique, from women with COVID‐19 81 . A neonatal pharyngeal swab can also be collected. If possible, testing for SARS‐CoV‐2 of the miscarried fetus/placenta of COVID‐19 pregnant women should be undertaken. In addition to testing for SARS‐CoV‐2 RNA by qRT‐PCR, serological testing could be an important supplement in order to clarify the issue of vertical transmission of the virus. Longitudinal follow‐up for 6–18 months of infants born to COVID‐19 women should be undertaken 81 . Neonatal management Regarding neonatal management of suspected, probable and confirmed cases of maternal COVID‐19, the umbilical cord should be clamped promptly and the neonate should be transferred to the resuscitation area for assessment by the attending pediatric team. There should be different healthcare workers taking care of the mother and the baby in order to minimize the risk of cross‐contamination. There is insufficient evidence regarding whether delayed cord clamping increases the risk of infection to the newborn via direct contact 75 . In units in which delayed cord clamping is recommended, clinicians should consider carefully whether this practice should be continued. There is also currently insufficient evidence regarding the safety of breastfeeding and the need for mother–baby separation 26 , 82 . If the mother is severely or critically ill, separation appears to be the best option, with attempts to express breastmilk in order to maintain milk production. For this, there should be a dedicated breast pump and the machine should be washed thoroughly, according to the manufacturer's recommendations, after each use 83 . If the patient is asymptomatic or mildly affected, breastfeeding and colocation (also called rooming‐in) can be considered by the mother in coordination with healthcare providers, or may be necessary if facility limitations prevent mother–baby separation. Since the main concern is that the virus may be transmitted by respiratory droplets rather than breastmilk, breastfeeding mothers should wash their hands and wear a three‐ply surgical mask before touching the baby. In case of rooming‐in, the baby's cot should be kept at least 2 m from the mother's bed, and a physical barrier, such as a curtain or glass, may be used 84 , 85 . The need to separate mothers with COVID‐19 from their newborns, with the consequence that they are unable to breastfeed directly, may impede early bonding as well as establishment of lactation 86 . These factors will inevitably cause additional stress for mothers in the postpartum period. As well as caring for their physical wellbeing, medical teams should consider the mental wellbeing of these mothers, showing appropriate concern and providing support when needed 23 , 86 . GENERAL PRECAUTIONS At the time of writing, there are no effective drugs or vaccines to prevent COVID‐19. Therefore, personal protection should be considered in order to minimize the risk of contracting the virus. Patients and healthcare providers Good personal hygiene should be maintained: during the COVID‐19 pandemic period, close contact with others should be consciously avoided, participation in any gathering in which a distance of at least 2 m between individuals cannot be maintained should be avoided, attention should be paid to hand washing and hand sanitizer (with 70% alcohol concentration) used frequently 33 , 87 . A three‐ply surgical mask should be worn when visiting a hospital or other high‐risk area. Medical assistance should be sought promptly for timely diagnosis and treatment when symptoms such as fever and cough are experienced. Healthcare providers Provision of educational information (brochures, posters) in waiting areas should be considered. Triage plans for screening should be set up. In units in which triage areas have been set up, staff should have appropriate PPE and be strictly compliant with hand hygiene. All pregnant patients who present to the hospital and for outpatient visits should be assessed and screened for symptoms and risk factors based on TOCC (Appendix 2). Pregnant patients with known TOCC risk factors and those with mild or asymptomatic COVID‐19 should postpone antenatal visits and routine ultrasound assessment for 14 days, if advisable. Departments should consider reducing the number of visitors. In units in which routine group‐B streptococcus (GBS) screening is practiced, acquisition of vaginal and/or anal swabs should be delayed by 14 days in pregnant women with symptoms and/or TOCC risk factors or should be performed only after a suspected/probable case tests negative or after recovery in a confirmed case. Intrapartum prophylactic antibiotic cover for women with ante‐ or intrapartum risk factors for GBS is an alternative. On presentation to triage areas, pregnant patients with symptoms and/or TOCC risk factors should be placed in an isolation room for further assessment. Medical staff who are caring for suspected, probable or confirmed cases of COVID‐19 should be monitored closely for fever or other signs of infection and should not be working if they have any COVID‐19 symptoms. Common symptoms at onset of illness include fever, dry cough, myalgia, fatigue, dyspnea and anorexia. Ideally, medical staff assigned to care for suspected, probable or confirmed cases of COVID‐19 should minimize contact with other patients and colleagues, with the aim of reducing the risk of exposure and potential transmission. Medical staff who have been exposed unexpectedly, while without PPE, to a COVID‐19 pregnant patient, should be quarantined or self‐isolate for 14 days. Pregnant healthcare professionals should follow risk‐assessment and infection‐control guidelines following exposure to patients with suspected, probable or confirmed COVID‐19. KEY POINTS FOR CONSIDERATION Pregnant women with confirmed COVID‐19 should ideally be managed by designated tertiary hospitals, and they should be informed of the risk of adverse pregnancy outcome. Negative‐pressure isolation rooms should be set up for safe labor, delivery (including Cesarean section) and postpartum (including neonatal) care. During the COVID‐19 pandemic period, a detailed history regarding TOCC and clinical manifestations should be acquired routinely from all pregnant women attending for routine care. Chest imaging, especially CT scan, should be included in the work‐up of pregnant women with suspected, probable or confirmed COVID‐19. Suspected/probable cases should be treated in isolation and confirmed cases should be managed in a negative‐pressure isolation room. A woman with confirmed infection who is critically ill should be admitted to a negative‐pressure isolation room in the ICU. Antenatal examination and delivery of pregnant women with COVID‐19 should be carried out in a negative‐pressure isolation room on the labor ward. Human traffic around this room should be limited when it is occupied by an infected patient. All medical staff involved in management of infected women should don appropriate PPE (fit‐tested N95, FFP2 or equivalent‐standard respirator, eye protection (goggles and/or face shield), disposable fluid‐resistant and impermeable protective gown and double gloves). Management of COVID‐19 pregnant women should be undertaken by a multidisciplinary team (obstetricians, maternal–fetal‐medicine subspecialists, intensivists, obstetric anesthetists, midwives, internal‐medicine or respiratory physicians, virologists, microbiologists, neonatologists, infectious‐disease specialists). Vigilant maternal monitoring (including oxygen‐saturation monitoring) of all COVID‐19 patients is paramount, allowing for rapid commencement of supportive care. The use of a MEOWS chart is recommended. Timing and mode of delivery should be individualized, dependent mainly on the clinical status of the patient, gestational age and fetal condition. Both regional anesthesia and general anesthesia can be considered, depending on the clinical condition of the patient and after consultation with the obstetric anesthetist. If possible, regional anesthesia is preferable due to a lower risk of transmission in comparison with general anesthesia. At present, limited data suggest that there is no evidence of vertical mother‐to‐baby transmission in women who develop COVID‐19 in late pregnancy, although case reports of potential vertical transmission have emerged. There is currently insufficient evidence regarding the safety of breastfeeding and the need for mother–baby separation. If the mother is severely or critically ill, separation appears to be the best option, with attempts to express breastmilk in order to maintain milk production. If the patient is asymptomatic or mildly affected, breastfeeding and colocation (rooming‐in) can be considered by the mother in coordination with healthcare providers. Healthcare professionals engaged in obstetric care and those who perform obstetric ultrasound examinations should be trained and fitted appropriately for PPE. We strongly recommend submitting cases to local, regional or international registries for SARS‐CoV‐2‐infected pregnant women, with the aim of answering the many clinical and scientific questions in relation to the impact of COVID‐19 during pregnancy. AUTHORS This Interim Guidance was produced by: L. C. Poon, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR H. Yang, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China S. Dumont, Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; and Department of Gynaecology, AZ Delta, Roeselare, Belgium J. C. S. Lee, Division of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore J. A. Copel, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology & Reproductive Sciences, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA L. Danneels, Department of Gynaecology, AZ Delta, Roeselare, Belgium A. Wright, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Royal Free Teaching Hospital Foundation Trust, London, UK F. Da Silva Costa, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil; and Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia T. Y. Leung, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR Y. Zhang, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China D. Chen, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China F. Prefumo, Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy CITATION This Interim Guidance should be cited as: Poon LC, Yang H, Dumont S, Lee JCS, Copel JA, Danneels L, Wright A, Da Silva Costa F, Leung TY, Zhang Y, Chen D, Prefumo F. ISUOG Interim Guidance on coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) during pregnancy and puerperium: information for healthcare professionals–an update. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2020; 55: 848–862. Supporting information Appendix  S1 Summary of changes from previous Interim Guidance1 Appendix S2 Potential drugs for treatment of COVID‐19 in pregnant women 90 , 91 , 92 , 93 , 94 , 95 , 96 , 97 , 98 , 99 , 100 , 101 , 102 , 103 , 104 , 105 , 106 , 107 , 108 , 109 , 110 , 111 , 112 , 113 , 114 , 115 Appendix S3 2007 Infectious Diseases Society of America/American Thoracic Society criteria for defining severe community‐acquired pneumonia 55 , 56 Appendix S4 Hour‐1 Surviving Sepsis Campaign bundle of care 59 Click here for additional data file.