8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Antibody response following Hepatitis B vaccination in peritoneal dialysis patients: does normalized urea clearance matter?

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          OBJECTIVES:

          Data on the factors that contribute to the antibody response to hepatitis B virus vaccination in peritoneal dialysis patients are scarce. The current study was conducted on a group of peritoneal dialysis patients to learn how the response to hepatitis B virus vaccination varies according to the patient's clearance of urea normalized to total body water (Kt/V).

          METHODS:

          A convenience sample of 33 peritoneal dialysis patients (13 women and 20 men, with a mean age of 49±12 years) was administered double doses (20 µg IM in each deltoid muscle) of recombinant hepatitis B vaccine at 0, 1, 2, and 6 months. Response to immunization was measured at one to three months after the final dose of vaccine. The subjects were divided into groups according to the level of antibodies to hepatitis B surface antigen (anti-HBs), including non-responders (<10 IU/L), weak responders (10-100 IU/L), and good responders (>100 IU/L).

          RESULTS:

          Among non-responders, weak responders, and good responders, significant differences were found in age (54±12 vs. 56±9 vs. 45±12 years, respectively; p = 0.049) and recombinant human erythropoietin use (20 vs. 29 vs. 76%, respectively; p = 0.016). No significant differences in weekly total Kt/V ( p = 0.704), weekly peritoneal Kt/V ( p = 0.064) and residual glomerular filtration rate ( p = 0.355) were found across the three groups.

          CONCLUSIONS:

          Delivered clearance measured by weekly peritoneal Kt/V and total clearance measured by weekly total Kt/V did not predict the response to hepatitis B virus vaccination in patients on peritoneal dialysis.

          Related collections

          Most cited references70

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Measurement of residual renal function in patients treated with continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis.

          Renal function contributes markedly to the adequacy of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD). The best way to measure it in clinical practice has not been established. Ten stable CAPD patients with residual renal function were investigated to compare the GFR measured as inulin clearance (Cli) with the creatinine clearance (Clc), the urea clearance (Clu), and with 0.5(Clc + Clu). Thereafter, an analysis of whether the administration of cimetidine could improve the accuracy of these clearances was performed. Two clearance periods (CP) of 24 h were investigated. During CP-2, patients received 400 mg cimetidine twice daily, for a total dose of 1200 mg. Two h before the urine and dialysate collection period, inulin was administered iv. Calculations were done for each CP for Cli, Clc, Clu, Clc-Cli, the Clc/Cli ratio, and the tubular secretion of creatinine (TSc). No differences between CP-1 and CP-2 were present for urinary excretion of volume and solutes, and clearance rates of inulin and urea. The median TSc decreased from 0.71 mumol/min (range, -0.24 to 5.90) in CP-1 to 0.30 mumol/min (range, -0.18 to 0.64) in CP-2 (P < 0.05). Therefore, the median ratio of Clc/Cli decreased from 1.23 (range, 0.87 to 2.20) in CP-1 to 1.11 (range, 0.95 to 1.51) in CP-2 (P < 0.05). The median overestimation of the Cli in CP-1 by the Clc was 0.90 mL/min (range, -0.28 to 3.80) and by the 0.5(Clc + Clu) was 0.30 (range, -0.67 to 1.52). The median overestimation of Cli during cimetidine treatment in CP-2 was 0.43 mL/min (range, -0.21 to 1.20). The range, in differences between Cli and Clc, in CP-2 was smaller than that between Cli and 0.5(Clc + Clu) in CP-1. The difference between the clearance rate of inulin and creatinine or the combined clearance rate of urea and creatinine was not influenced by the magnitude of the average GFR. It can be concluded that the administration of cimetidine improved the accuracy of measuring the GFR with the Clc in CAPD patients.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Meta-analysis: the effect of age on immunological response to hepatitis B vaccine in end-stage renal disease.

            Patients on maintenance dialysis typically show a suboptimal immune response to hepatitis B virus vaccine compared with the non-uraemic population. A variety of inherited or acquired factors have been implicated in this diminished response. Age-associated changes in immune status may contribute to decreased vaccine efficacy in older individuals although contradictory results have been reported in individuals with normal kidney function. To evaluate the relationship between age and immune response to hepatitis B vaccine in patients with end-stage renal disease by performing a systematic review of the literature with a meta-analysis of clinical trials. We used the random effects model of DerSimonian and Laird; sources of heterogeneity in effect estimates were explored by performing sensitivity analyses. We identified 17 clinical trials (1800 unique patients); six (35%) were controlled studies. Pooling of study results demonstrated a significantly decreased risk of response to hepatitis B vaccine among older dialysis patients (overall risk ratio: 0.74; 95% confidence intervals: 0.70-0.79). The P-value was 0.0139 for our test of study heterogeneity. A lowered risk of response to hepatitis B vaccine persisted after exclusion of trials based on plasma-derived vaccines; it was present even when 'older' individuals were defined as being as 50 years (RR: 0.85, 95% CI: 0.75-0.96) or more (cut-off 60 years RR: 0.75; 95% CI: 0.66-0.85). An effect of age on seroprotection rate was present in all clinical reports, irrespective of the geographic origin of the study group: Europe (RR: 0.76; 95% CI: 0.70-0.83) North America (RR: 0.67; 95% CI: 0.60-0.74) or other countries (RR: 0.83; 95% CI: 0.71-0.97). Additional doses of vaccine did not appear to have an impact on RR of response by age. Our meta-analysis showed a clear association between older age and impaired response to hepatitis B virus vaccine in end-stage renal disease patients. Such a relationship is biologically plausible. Vaccination schedules with adapted vaccine doses and frequent serum testing for loss of immunity against hepatitis B virus are recommended in elderly patients on maintenance dialysis.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              A new adjuvant improves the immune response to hepatitis B vaccine in hemodialysis patients.

              Prehemodialysis and hemodialysis patients are at an increased risk of hepatitis B infection and have an impaired immune response to hepatitis B vaccines. We evaluated the immune response to the new adjuvant of hepatitis B vaccine AS04 (HBV-AS04) in this population. We measured antibody persistence for up to 42 months, and the anamnestic response and safety of booster doses in patients who were no longer seroprotected. The primary vaccination study showed that HBV-AS04 elicited an earlier antibody response and higher antibody titers than four double doses of standard hepatitis B vaccine. Seroprotection rates were significantly higher in HBV-AS04 recipients throughout the study. The decline in seroprotection over time was significantly less in the HBV-AS04 group with significantly fewer primed patients requiring a booster dose over the follow-up period. Solicited/unsolicited adverse events were rare following booster administration. Fifty-seven patients experienced a serious adverse event during the follow-up; none of which was vaccine related. When HBV-AS04 was used as the priming immunogen, the need for a booster dose occurred at a longer time compared to double doses of standard hepatitis B vaccine. Hence, in this population, the HBV-AS04 was immunogenic, safe, and well-tolerated both as a booster dose after HBV-AS04 or standard hepatitis B vaccine priming.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Clinics (Sao Paulo)
                Clinics
                Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo
                1807-5932
                1980-5322
                September 2011
                : 66
                : 9
                : 1559-1562
                Affiliations
                [I ]Departments of Nephrology, Kocaeli University School of Medicine, Kocaeli, Turkey.
                [II ]Internal Medicine, Kocaeli University School of Medicine, Kocaeli, Turkey.
                Author notes
                E-mail: dervisoglue@ 123456yahoo.com Tel.: 90 2623037041
                Article
                cln_66p1559
                10.1590/S1807-59322011000900009
                3164404
                22179159
                87ea792f-56a0-4363-9dea-aedccbf58a53
                Copyright © 2011 Hospital das Clínicas da FMUSP

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 4 April 2011
                : 25 April 2011
                : 20 May 2011
                Page count
                Pages: 4
                Categories
                Clinical Science

                Medicine
                dialysis adequacy,hepatitis b virus,kt/v,vaccination,continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis

                Comments

                Comment on this article