30
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Action Enhances Acoustic Cues for 3-D Target Localization by Echolocating Bats

      research-article
      1 , 2 , * , 1 , 2 , 1 , 2
      PLoS Biology
      Public Library of Science

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Under natural conditions, animals encounter a barrage of sensory information from which they must select and interpret biologically relevant signals. Active sensing can facilitate this process by engaging motor systems in the sampling of sensory information. The echolocating bat serves as an excellent model to investigate the coupling between action and sensing because it adaptively controls both the acoustic signals used to probe the environment and movements to receive echoes at the auditory periphery. We report here that the echolocating bat controls the features of its sonar vocalizations in tandem with the positioning of the outer ears to maximize acoustic cues for target detection and localization. The bat’s adaptive control of sonar vocalizations and ear positioning occurs on a millisecond timescale to capture spatial information from arriving echoes, as well as on a longer timescale to track target movement. Our results demonstrate that purposeful control over sonar sound production and reception can serve to improve acoustic cues for localization tasks. This finding also highlights the general importance of movement to sensory processing across animal species. Finally, our discoveries point to important parallels between spatial perception by echolocation and vision.

          Abstract

          As an echolocating bat tracks a moving target, it produces head waggles and adjusts the separation of the tips of its ears to enhance cues for target detection and localization. These findings suggest parallels in active sensing between echolocation and vision.

          Author Summary

          As animals operate in the natural environment, they must detect and process relevant sensory information embedded in complex and noisy signals. One strategy to overcome this challenge is to use active sensing or behavioral adjustments to extract sensory information from a selected region of the environment. We studied one of nature’s champions in auditory active sensing—the echolocating bat—to understand how this animal extracts task-relevant acoustic cues to detect and track a moving target. The bat produces high-frequency vocalizations and processes information carried by returning echoes to navigate and catch prey. This animal serves as an excellent model of active sensing because both sonar signal transmission and echo reception are under the animal’s active control. We used high-speed stereo video images of the bat’s head and ear movements, along with synchronized audio recordings, to study how the bat coordinates adaptive motor behaviors when detecting and tracking moving prey. We found that the bat synchronizes changes in sonar vocal production with changes in the movements of the head and ears to enhance acoustic cues for target detection and localization.

          Related collections

          Most cited references29

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The role of attention in the programming of saccades.

          Accurate saccadic programming in natural visual scenes requires a signal designating which of the many potential targets is to be the goal of the saccade. Is this signal controlled by the allocation of perceptual attention, or do saccades have their own independent selective filter? We found evidence for the involvement of perceptual attention, namely: (1) summoning perceptual attention to a target also facilitated saccades; (2) perceptual identification was better at the saccadic goal than elsewhere; and (3) attempts to dissociate the locus of attention from the saccadic goal were unsuccessful, i.e. it was not possible to prepare to look quickly and accurately at one target while at the same time making highly accurate perceptual judgements about targets elsewhere. We also studied the trade-off between saccadic and perceptual performance by means of a novel application of the "attentional operating characteristic" (AOC) to oculomotor performance. This analysis revealed that some attention could be diverted from the saccadic goal with virtually no cost to either saccadic latency or accuracy, showing that there is a ceiling on the attentional demands of saccades. The links we discovered between saccades and attention can be explained by a model in which perceptual attention determines the endpoint of the saccade, while a separate trigger signal initiates the saccade in response to transient changes in the attentional locus. The model will be discussed in the context of current neurophysiological work on saccadic control.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Dynamics of Active Sensing and perceptual selection.

            Sensory processing is often regarded as a passive process in which biological receptors like photoreceptors and mechanoreceptors transduce physical energy into a neural code. Recent findings, however, suggest that: first, most sensory processing is active, and largely determined by motor/attentional sampling routines; second, owing to rhythmicity in the motor routine, as well as to its entrainment of ambient rhythms in sensory regions, sensory inflow tends to be rhythmic; third, attentional manipulation of rhythms in sensory pathways is instrumental to perceptual selection. These observations outline the essentials of an Active Sensing paradigm, and argue for increased emphasis on the study of sensory processes as specific to the dynamic motor/attentional context in which inputs are acquired. (c) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Echolocation behavior of big brown bats, Eptesicus fuscus, in the field and the laboratory.

              Echolocation signals were recorded from big brown bats, Eptesicus fuscus, flying in the field and the laboratory. In open field areas the interpulse intervals (IPI) of search signals were either around 134 ms or twice that value, 270 ms. At long IPI's the signals were of long duration (14 to 18-20 ms), narrow bandwidth, and low frequency, sweeping down to a minimum frequency (Fmin) of 22-25 kHz. At short IPI's the signals were shorter (6-13 ms), of higher frequency, and broader bandwidth. In wooded areas only short (6-11 ms) relatively broadband search signals were emitted at a higher rate (avg. IPI= 122 ms) with higher Fmin (27-30 kHz). In the laboratory the IPI was even shorter (88 ms), the duration was 3-5 ms, and the Fmin 30- 35 kHz, resembling approach phase signals of field recordings. Excluding terminal phase signals, all signals from all areas showed a negative correlation between signal duration and Fmin, i.e., the shorter the signal, the higher was Fmin. This correlation was reversed in the terminal phase of insect capture sequences, where Fmin decreased with decreasing signal duration. Overall, the signals recorded in the field were longer, with longer IPI's and greater variability in bandwidth than signals recorded in the laboratory.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Academic Editor
                Journal
                PLoS Biol
                PLoS Biol
                plos
                plosbiol
                PLoS Biology
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, CA USA )
                1544-9173
                1545-7885
                8 September 2016
                September 2016
                8 September 2016
                : 14
                : 9
                : e1002544
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Psychology and Institute for Systems Research, Program in Neuroscience and Cognitive Science, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, United States of America
                [2 ]Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America
                Queen Mary University of London, UNITED KINGDOM
                Author notes

                The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

                • Conceptualization: MJW NBK CFM.

                • Data curation: MJW.

                • Formal analysis: MJW NBK CFM.

                • Funding acquisition: MJW CFM.

                • Investigation: MJW NBK.

                • Methodology: MJW NBK CFM.

                • Project administration: MJW NBK CFM.

                • Resources: CFM.

                • Software: MJW NBK CFM.

                • Supervision: CFM.

                • Validation: MJW NBK CFM.

                • Visualization: MJW NBK CFM.

                • Writing – original draft: MJW.

                • Writing – review & editing: MJW NBK CFM.

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5543-6459
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6916-0000
                Article
                PBIOLOGY-D-16-00211
                10.1371/journal.pbio.1002544
                5015854
                27608186
                8821940c-19f6-4718-b783-be7a01f61d81
                © 2016 Wohlgemuth et al

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 28 January 2016
                : 4 August 2016
                Page count
                Figures: 5, Tables: 1, Pages: 21
                Funding
                Funded by: funder-id http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000055, National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders;
                Award ID: T32-DC00046
                Award Recipient : Melville Joseph Wohlgemuth
                Funded by: funder-id http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000001, National Science Foundation;
                Award ID: IOS-1010193
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: Human Frontier Science Program (FR)
                Award ID: RGP0040
                Award Recipient :
                This work was supported by the following research grants to CFM: NSF IOS1460149, AFOSR FA9550-14-1-039, and ONR N00014-12-1-0339. MJW was supported by the Comparative and Evolutionary Biology of Hearing institutional training grant T32 DC000046 from the National Institute of Deafness and Communicative Disorders of the National Institutes of Health awarded to A. N. Popper. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Organisms
                Animals
                Vertebrates
                Amniotes
                Mammals
                Bats
                Engineering and Technology
                Remote Sensing
                Sonar
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Behavior
                Animal Behavior
                Animal Signaling and Communication
                Vocalization
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Zoology
                Animal Behavior
                Animal Signaling and Communication
                Vocalization
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Anatomy
                Head
                Ears
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Anatomy
                Head
                Ears
                Physical Sciences
                Physics
                Acoustics
                Echoes
                Physical Sciences
                Physics
                Acoustics
                Bioacoustics
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Bioacoustics
                Computer and Information Sciences
                Computer Vision
                Target Detection
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Behavior
                Animal Behavior
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Zoology
                Animal Behavior
                Custom metadata
                All data files are can be found at the Johns Hopkins University Data archives: http://dx.doi.org/10.7281/T1W66HPZ. The full data citation is as follows: Wohlgemuth, M. J., Kothari, N. B., Moss, C. F. 2016. Data associated with the PLoS Biology publication "Action enhances acoustic cues for 3-D target localization by echolocating bats." Version 1. Johns Hopkins University Data Archive. http://dx.doi.org/10.7281/T1W66HPZ.

                Life sciences
                Life sciences

                Comments

                Comment on this article