15
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Impact of body-mass factors on setup displacement in patients with head and neck cancer treated with radiotherapy using daily on-line image guidance

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          To determine the impact of body-mass factors (BMF) before radiotherapy and changes during radiotherapy on the magnitude of setup displacement in patients with head and neck cancer (HNC).

          Methods

          The clinical data of 30 patients with HNC was analyzed using the alignment data from daily on-line on-board imaging from image-guided radiotherapy. BMFs included body weight, body height, and the circumference and bilateral thickness of the neck. Changes in the BMFs during treatment were retrieved from cone beam computed tomography at the 10th and 20th fractions. Setup errors for each patient were assessed by systematic error (SE) and random error (RE) through the superior-inferior (SI), anterior-posterior (AP), and medial-lateral (ML) directions, and couch rotation (CR). Using the median values of the BMFs as a cutoff, the impact of the factors on the magnitude of displacement was assessed by the Mann–Whitney U test.

          Results

          A higher body weight before radiotherapy correlated with a greater AP-SE ( p = 0.045), SI-RE ( p = 0.023), and CR-SE ( p = 0.033). A longer body height was associated with a greater SI-RE ( p = 0.002). A performance status score of 1 or 2 was related to a greater AP-SE ( p = 0.043), AP-RE ( p = 0.015), and SI-RE ( p = 0.043). Among the ratios of the BMFs during radiotherapy, the values at the level of mastoid tip at the 20 th fraction were associated with greater setup errors.

          Conclusions

          To reduce setup errors in patients with HNC receiving RT, the use of on-line image-guided radiotherapy is recommended for patients with a large body weight or height, and a performance status score of 1–2. In addition, adaptive planning should be considered for those who have a large reduction ratio in the circumference (<1) and thickness (<0.94) over the level of the mastoid tip during the 20 th fraction of treatment.

          Related collections

          Most cited references16

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Adaptive radiotherapy for head and neck cancer--dosimetric results from a prospective clinical trial.

          To conduct a clinical trial evaluating adaptive head and neck radiotherapy (ART). Patients with locally advanced oropharyngeal cancer were prospectively enrolled. Daily CT-guided setup and deformable image registration permitted mapping of dose to avoidance structures and CTVs. We compared four planning scenarios: (1) original IMRT plan aligned daily to marked isocenter (BB); (2) original plan aligned daily to bone (IGRT); (3) IGRT with one adaptive replan (ART1); and (4) actual treatment received by each study patient (IGRT with one or two adaptive replans, ART2). All 22 study patients underwent one replan (ART1); eight patients had two replans (ART2). ART1 reduced mean dose to contralateral parotid by 0.6 Gy or 2.8% (paired t-test; p=0.003) and ipsilateral parotid by 1.3 Gy (3.9%) (p=0.002) over the IGRT alone. ART2 further reduced the mean contralateral parotid dose by 0.8 Gy or 3.8% (p=0.026) and ipsilateral parotid by 4.1 Gy or 9% (p=0.001). ART significantly reduced integral body dose. This pilot trial suggests that head and neck ART dosimetrically outperforms IMRT. IGRT that leverages conventional PTV margins does not improve dosimetry. One properly timed replan delivers the majority of achievable dosimetric improvement. The clinical impact of ART must be confirmed by future trials. Copyright © 2012. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Adaptive radiotherapy of head and neck cancer.

            Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in head and neck (H&N) cancer has the capability to generate steep dose gradients, leading to an improved therapeutic index. IMRT plans are typically based on a pretreatment computed tomography scan that provides a snapshot of the patient's anatomy. Nevertheless, interfractional patient variations may occur because of setup error and anatomical modifications. Therefore, the accuracy of IMRT delivery for H&N cancer may be compromised during the treatment course, potentially affecting the therapeutic index. In this framework, adaptive radiotherapy is a potential solution, which consists of "the explicit inclusion of the temporal changes in anatomy during the imaging, planning, and delivery of radiotherapy." Adaptive radiotherapy has brought an additional dimension to the management of patients with H&N cancer and has the potential to counteract the effects of positioning errors and anatomical changes. This article reviews the causes and discusses potential solutions to circumvent the discrepancies between the planned dose and the actual dose received by patients treated for H&N malignancies. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The role of replanning in fractionated intensity modulated radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

              Anatomic changing frequently occurred during fractionated radiotherapy. The aims of this study were to model the potential benefit of adaptive IMRT replanning during fractionated radiotherapy and its potential advantage over clinical outcome in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Thirty-three patients with repeat CT imaging and replanning were retrospectively analyzed. 66 case-matched control patients without replanning were identified by matching for AJCC stage, gender, and age. Hybrid IMRT plans were generated to evaluate the dosimetric changing. Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon tests were used to evaluate the effect of replanning on volumetric and dosimetric outcomes within individuals. Kaplan-Meier estimators were used to estimate the survival function of patients with or without replanning. The mean volume of the ipsilateral and contralateral parotid glands decreased during the treatment. The hybrid IMRT plans showed decreased doses to target volumes and increased doses to normal structures in replanning. The clinical outcome comparison indicated that the IMRT replanning improved the 3 years local progression-free survival for patients who had AJCC staged more than T(3) (T(3,4)N(x)) and ease the late effects for patients who had large lymph nodes (AJCC stage T(x)N(2,3)). Repeat CT imaging and IMRT replanning were recommendatory for specific nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients. Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Radiat Oncol
                Radiat Oncol
                Radiation Oncology (London, England)
                BioMed Central
                1748-717X
                2014
                10 January 2014
                : 9
                : 19
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Radiation Oncology, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
                [2 ]School of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
                [3 ]School of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
                [4 ]Department of Biomedical Imaging and Radiological Science, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
                Article
                1748-717X-9-19
                10.1186/1748-717X-9-19
                3904466
                24411006
                88942d88-d916-4950-a2fe-12dbfa4ec00a
                Copyright © 2014 Lai et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 26 October 2013
                : 2 January 2014
                Categories
                Research

                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                head and neck cancer,setup error,image-guided radiotherapy,body-related factors,adaptive radiotherapy

                Comments

                Comment on this article