4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Adjuvant chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab in patients with resected non-small-cell lung cancer (E1505): an open-label, multicentre, randomised, phase 3 trial

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          SUMMARY

          Background

          Adjuvant chemotherapy for resected early stage NSCLC provides modest survival benefit. Bevacizumab, a monoclonal antibody directed against vascular endothelial growth factor, improves outcomes when added to platinum-based chemotherapy in advanced stage non-squamous NSCLC. We conducted a phase III study to evaluate the addition of bevacizumab to adjuvant chemotherapy in early stage resected NSCLC (E1505). The primary endpoint was overall survival.

          Methods

          Adult patients (≥ 18 years old) with ECOG performance status 0 or 1 with completely resected stage IB (≥4 centimeters) to IIIA (AJCC 6th edition) NSCLC were enrolled within 6–12 weeks of surgery and stratified by chemotherapy regimen, stage, histology, and sex. Minimum mediastinal lymph node sampling at specified levels was required (level 7 and 4 for right-sided tumors or level 7 and 5 and/or 6 for left-sided tumors). Normal laboratory values within two weeks of randomisation were required for enrollment. Chemotherapy, which was selected for each patient prior to randomisation, consisted of four, 3-week (21-day) cycles of cisplatin (75 mg/m 2 in all regimens) with either vinorelbine 30 mg/m 2 days 1 and 8; docetaxel 75 mg/m 2 day 1; OR gemcitabine 1200 mg/m 2 days 1 and 8; OR, starting in 2009 with an amendment, pemetrexed 500 mg/m 2 day 1 along with B12 and folic acid supplementation. Patients were randomised 1:1 to Arm A (chemotherapy) or Arm B, adding bevacizumab at 15 mg/kg every 3 weeks starting with cycle 1 of chemotherapy and continuing for one year. Randomisation to treatment arm was performed centrally and determined using permuted blocks within strata with dynamic balancing on institution. The study had 85% power to detect a 21% reduction in the overall survival (OS) hazard rate with a one-sided 0·025-level test. The primary endpoint was overall survival, which was defined as the time from randomisation to death from any cause, and patients who were thought to be alive at the time of final analysis were censored at the last date of contact with analysis done based on intention to treat. This is final analysis of the primary endpoint of overall survival of E1505 (NCT00324805).

          Findings

          From July 2007 to September 2013, 1501 patients were enrolled, of whom 26% (N=383) had stage IB, 44% (N=636) stage II, and 30% (N=439) stage IIIA) with 28% (N=422) squamous cell histology. Cisplatin-based chemotherapy regimens utilized were vinorelbine 25% (N=377), docetaxel 23% (N=343), gemcitabine 19% (N=283), and pemetrexed 33% (N=497). At a median follow-up time of 50·3 months (IQR 32.9–68.0), estimated OS hazard ratio (B/A) was 0·99 (95% CI: 0·82–1·19, p=0·90). The median OS on Arm A has not been reached and is 85.8 months (95% CI 74.9-NA) on Arm B. Statistically significantly increased grade 3–5 toxicities of note (all attributions) included: overall worst grade (ie all grade 3/4/5 toxicities) (67%(N=496) versus 83%(N=610)); hypertension (8%(N=60) versus 30%(N=219)), and neutropenia (33%(N=241) versus 37%(N=275)) on Arms A and B, respectively. There was no significant difference in grade 5 adverse events per arm (N=15 on arm A and N=19 on arm B).

          Interpretation

          The addition of bevacizumab to adjuvant chemotherapy failed to improve overall survival for patients with surgically resected early stage NSCLC. Bevacizumab does not have a role in this setting and should not be considered as an adjuvant therapy for resected NSCLC patients.

          Funding

          This study was coordinated by the ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group and supported by the National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health.

          Related collections

          Most cited references12

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Cisplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with completely resected non-small-cell lung cancer.

          On the basis of a previous meta-analysis, the International Adjuvant Lung Cancer Trial was designed to evaluate the effect of cisplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy on survival after complete resection of non-small-cell lung cancer. We randomly assigned patients either to three or four cycles of cisplatin-based chemotherapy or to observation. Before randomization, each center determined the pathological stages to include, its policy for chemotherapy (the dose of cisplatin and the drug to be combined with cisplatin), and its postoperative radiotherapy policy. The main end point was overall survival. A total of 1867 patients underwent randomization; 36.5 percent had pathological stage I disease, 24.2 percent stage II, and 39.3 percent stage III. The drug allocated with cisplatin was etoposide in 56.5 percent of patients, vinorelbine in 26.8 percent, vinblastine in 11.0 percent, and vindesine in 5.8 percent. Of the 932 patients assigned to chemotherapy, 73.8 percent received at least 240 mg of cisplatin per square meter of body-surface area. The median duration of follow-up was 56 months. Patients assigned to chemotherapy had a significantly higher survival rate than those assigned to observation (44.5 percent vs. 40.4 percent at five years [469 deaths vs. 504]; hazard ratio for death, 0.86; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.76 to 0.98; P<0.03). Patients assigned to chemotherapy also had a significantly higher disease-free survival rate than those assigned to observation (39.4 percent vs. 34.3 percent at five years [518 events vs. 577]; hazard ratio, 0.83; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.74 to 0.94; P<0.003). There were no significant interactions with prespecified factors. Seven patients (0.8 percent) died of chemotherapy-induced toxic effects. Cisplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy improves survival among patients with completely resected non-small-cell lung cancer. Copyright 2004 Massachusetts Medical Society
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Phase III trial of cisplatin plus gemcitabine with either placebo or bevacizumab as first-line therapy for nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer: AVAil.

            Bevacizumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting vascular endothelial growth factor, improves survival when combined with carboplatin/paclitaxel for advanced nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This randomized phase III trial investigated the efficacy and safety of cisplatin/gemcitabine (CG) plus bevacizumab in this setting. Patients were randomly assigned to receive cisplatin 80 mg/m2 and gemcitabine 1,250 mg/m(2) for up to six cycles plus low-dose bevacizumab (7.5 mg/kg), high-dose bevacizumab (15 mg/kg), or placebo every 3 weeks until disease progression. The trial was not powered to compare the two doses directly. The primary end point was amended from overall survival (OS) to progression-free survival (PFS). Between February 2005 and August 2006, 1,043 patients were randomly assigned (placebo, n = 347; low dose, n = 345; high dose, n = 351). PFS was significantly prolonged; the hazard ratios for PFS were 0.75 (median PFS, 6.7 v 6.1 months for placebo; P = .003) in the low-dose group and 0.82 (median PFS, 6.5 v 6.1 months for placebo; P = .03) in the high-dose group compared with placebo. Objective response rates were 20.1%, 34.1%, and 30.4% for placebo, low-dose bevacizumab, and high-dose bevacizumab plus CG, respectively. Duration of follow-up was not sufficient for OS analysis. Incidence of grade 3 or greater adverse events was similar across arms. Grade > or = 3 pulmonary hemorrhage rates were < or = 1.5% for all arms despite 9% of patients receiving therapeutic anticoagulation. Combining bevacizumab (7.5 or 15 mg/kg) with CG significantly improved PFS and objective response rate. Bevacizumab plus platinum-based chemotherapy offers clinical benefit for bevacizumab-eligible patients with advanced NSCLC.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Adjuvant vinorelbine plus cisplatin versus observation in patients with completely resected stage IB–IIIA non-small-cell lung cancer (Adjuvant Navelbine International Trialist Association [ANITA]): a randomised controlled trial

              Whether adjuvant chemotherapy improves survival of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is not known. We aimed to compare the effect of adjuvant vinorelbine plus cisplatin versus observation on survival in patients with completely resected NSCLC. 840 patients with stage IB-IIIA NSCLC from 101 centres in 14 countries were randomly assigned to observation (n=433) or to 30 mg/m(2) vinorelbine plus 100 mg/m(2) cisplatin (n=407). Postoperative radiotherapy was not mandatory and was undertaken according to every centre's policy. The primary endpoint was overall survival. Analysis was by intention to treat. This trial is registered as an International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial, number ISRCTN95053737. 367 patients in the chemotherapy group and 431 in the control group received their assigned treatment. 301 (36%) patients had stage IB disease, 203 (24%) had stage II disease, and 325 (39%) had stage IIIA disease. Tolerance to chemotherapy mainly included neutropenia in 335 (92%) patients and febrile neutropenia in 34 (9%); seven (2%) toxic deaths were also recorded. Compliance was greater with cisplatin than with vinorelbine (median dose intensity 89% [range 17-108] vs 59% [17-100]). After a median follow-up of 76 months (range 43-116), median survival was 65.7 months (95% CI 47.9-88.5) in the chemotherapy group and 43.7 (35.7-52.3) months in the observation group. Adjusted risk for death was significantly reduced in patients assigned chemotherapy compared with controls (hazard ratio 0.80 [95% CI 0.66-0.96]; p=0.017). Overall survival at 5 years with chemotherapy improved by 8.6%, which was maintained at 7 years (8.4%). Adjuvant vinorelbine plus cisplatin extends survival in patients with completely resected NSCLC, better defining indication of adjuvant chemotherapy.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                On behalf of : on behalf of ECOG-ACRIN
                Journal
                100957246
                27004
                Lancet Oncol
                Lancet Oncol.
                The Lancet. Oncology
                1470-2045
                1474-5488
                25 November 2017
                09 November 2017
                December 2017
                01 December 2018
                : 18
                : 12
                : 1610-1623
                Affiliations
                Department of Medicine (Oncology), Stanford Cancer Institute/Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA (H A Wakelee MD), Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA (S E Dahlberg PhD), Department of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA (S M Keller MD), Albert Einstein Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA (W J Tester MD), UC Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, Sacramento, CA, USA (Prof D R Gandara MD), Divison of Medical Oncology, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, USA (Prof S L Graziano), Department of Medicine, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY, USA (Prof A Adjei MD), Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada (N B Leighl MD), Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ, USA (Prof S C Aisner MD), The Regional Cancer Center, Erie, PA, USA (J M Rothman MD), Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA (Prof J D Patel MD), Edina Clinic, Edina, MN, USA (M D Sborov MD), Department of Medical Oncology, Tallaght University Hospital, Cancer Trials Ireland (S R McDermott MD), Division of Oncology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA (Prof R Perez-Soler MD), University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA (A M Traynor MD), Division of Oncology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada (C Butts MD), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA (T Evans MD), Heartland Cancer Research NCORP, St. Louis, MO, USA (A Shafqat MD), Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA (A E Chapman MD), Southeast Clinical Oncology Research Consortium NCORP, Winston-Salem, NC, USA (S S Kasbari MD), Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA (L Horn MD), Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA (Prof S S Ramalingam MD), Division of Hematology/Oncology, UT Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA (Prof J Schiller MD)
                Author notes
                Correspondence to: Dr. Heather Wakelee, Department of Medicine (Oncology), Stanford Cancer Institute/Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA hwakelee@ 123456stanford.edu
                Article
                NIHMS921602
                10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30691-5
                5789803
                29129443
                88b80cbc-ec1f-4934-95f8-f853e460fd4e

                This manuscript version is made available under the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 license.

                History
                Categories
                Article

                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                Oncology & Radiotherapy

                Comments

                Comment on this article