Jonathan P Tennant 1 , Harry Crane 2 , Tom Crick 3 , Jacinto Davila 4 , Asura Enkhbayar 5 , Johanna Havemann 6 , Bianca Kramer 7 , Ryan Martin 8 , Paola Masuzzo 9 , Andy Nobes 10 , Curt Rice 11 , Bárbara R López 12 , Tony Ross-Hellauer 13 , Susanne Sattler 14 , Paul Thacker 15 , Marc Vanholsbeeck 16
March 11 2019
The changing world of scholarly communication and the emergence of ‘Open Science’ or ‘Open Research’ has brought to light a number of controversial and hotly-debated topics. Yet, evidence-based rational debate is regularly drowned out by misinformed or exaggerated rhetoric, which does not benefit the evolving system of scholarly communication. The aim of this article is to provide a baseline evidence framework for ten of the most contested topics, in order to help frame and move forward discussions, practices and policies. We address preprints and scooping, the practice of copyright transfer, the function of peer review, and the legitimacy of ‘global’ databases. The presented facts and data will be a powerful tool against misinformation across wider academic research, policy and practice, and may be used to inform changes within the rapidly evolving scholarly publishing system.