For Publishers
DiscoveryMetadataPeer reviewHostingPublishing
For Researchers
JoinPublishReviewCollect
Register
Blog
About
Search
Advanced search
My ScienceOpen
Search
For Publishers
For Researchers
Blog
About
2
views
44
references
 Top references
cited by
2
    
0 reviews
 Review
0
comments
 Comment
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      498
      similar
       All similar
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      State‐of‐the‐art consensus on non‐transvenous implantable cardioverter‐defibrillator therapy

      review-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Within the last decade, implantable cardioverter‐defibrillator (ICD) systems with non‐transvenous leads were developed in order to minimize complications related to the cardiovascular position of transvenous ICD leads. This national expert consensus gives an overview of potential indications for the implantation of non‐transvenous ICD systems, and provides specific recommendations for implantation, follow‐up, and complication management in patients with subcutaneous ICD. Regarding particular issues like the necessity for shock efficacy testing, or the clinical outcome as compared to transvenous ICD, randomized data are expected in the near future.

          Related collections

          Most cited references44

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          2017 HRS expert consensus statement on cardiovascular implantable electronic device lead management and extraction

          Fred Kusumoto, Mark Schoenfeld, Bruce L Wilkoff … (2017)
          Article 0 comments Cited 287 times – based on 0 reviews     Review now
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Transvenous lead extraction: Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus on facilities, training, indications, and patient management: this document was endorsed by the American Heart Association (AHA).

            Bruce L Wilkoff, Charles J. Love, Charles Byrd … (2009)
            Article 0 comments Cited 188 times – based on 0 reviews     Review now
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Implant and Midterm Outcomes of the Subcutaneous Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Registry

              Lucas Boersma, Craig S. Barr, Reinoud Knops … (2017)
              The subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) was developed to defibrillate ventricular arrhythmias, avoiding drawbacks of transvenous leads. The global EFFORTLESS S-ICD (Evaluation oF FactORs ImpacTing CLinical Outcome and Cost EffectiveneSS of the S-ICD) registry is collecting outcomes in 985 patients during a 5-year follow-up.
              Article 0 comments Cited 90 times – based on 0 reviews     Review now
                Bookmark
                All references

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Christoph Schukro:
                ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8604-7042
                christoph.schukro@meduniwien.ac.at
                Journal
                Journal ID (nlm-ta): Clin Cardiol
                Journal ID (iso-abbrev): Clin Cardiol
                Journal ID (doi): 10.1002/(ISSN)1932-8737
                Journal ID (publisher-id): CLC
                Title: Clinical Cardiology
                Publisher: Wiley Periodicals, Inc. (New York )
                ISSN (Print): 0160-9289
                ISSN (Electronic): 1932-8737
                Publication date (Electronic): 14 August 2020
                Publication date Collection: October 2020
                Volume: 43
                Issue: 10 ( doiID: 10.1002/clc.v43.10 )
                Pages: 1084-1092
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Department of Internal Medicine II, Division of Cardiology Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria
                [ 2 ] Department of Cardiac Surgery University Hospital Basel Basel Switzerland
                [ 3 ] Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiology Medical University of Graz Graz Austria
                [ 4 ] Department of Internal Medicine III Medical University of Innsbruck Innsbruck Austria
                [ 5 ] Department of Internal Medicine I Ordensklinikum Linz Elisabethinen Hospital Linz Austria
                [ 6 ] Department of Internal Medicine III Wiener Neustadt State Hospital Wiener Neustadt Austria
                [ 7 ] Department of Internal Medicine III University Hospital St. Pölten Austria
                [ 8 ] Department of Internal Medicine I Kepler University Hospital Linz Linz Austria
                [ 9 ] Department of Internal Medicine III Wilhelminen Hospital Vienna Vienna Austria
                [ 10 ] Department of Arrhythmias and Cardiac Pacing National Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases and Slovak Medical University Bratislava Slovakia
                [ 11 ] Department of Surgery, Division of Cardiac Surgery Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence

                Christoph Schukro, MD, PhD, FESC, Department of Internal Medicine II, Division of Cardiology, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18‐20, 1090 Vienna, Austria,

                Email: christoph.schukro@ 123456meduniwien.ac.at

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8604-7042
                Article
                Publisher ID: CLC23432
                DOI: 10.1002/clc.23432
                PMC ID: 7533987
                PubMed ID: 32794309
                SO-VID: 88fc7bc1-8c59-43a5-aa73-922d4e3a7783
                Copyright © © 2020 The Authors. Clinical Cardiology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.
                License:

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                Date received : 06 January 2020
                Date revision received : 14 July 2020
                Date accepted : 17 July 2020
                Page count
                Figures: 2, Tables: 1, Pages: 9, Words: 7390
                Categories
                Subject: Review
                Subject: Reviews
                Custom metadata
                source-schema-version-number 2.0
                cover-date October 2020
                details-of-publishers-convertor Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:5.9.1 mode:remove_FC converted:05.10.2020

                ScienceOpen disciplines: Cardiovascular Medicine
                Keywords: consensus document,non‐transvenous implantable cardioverter defibrillator,recommendations,subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator
                Data availability:
                ScienceOpen disciplines: Cardiovascular Medicine
                Keywords: consensus document, non‐transvenous implantable cardioverter defibrillator, recommendations, subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_

                Similar content498

                See all similar

                Cited by2

                See all cited by

                Most referenced authors1,145

                See all reference authors