Blog
About

0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      State‐of‐the‐art consensus on non‐transvenous implantable cardioverter‐defibrillator therapy

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Within the last decade, implantable cardioverter‐defibrillator (ICD) systems with non‐transvenous leads were developed in order to minimize complications related to the cardiovascular position of transvenous ICD leads. This national expert consensus gives an overview of potential indications for the implantation of non‐transvenous ICD systems, and provides specific recommendations for implantation, follow‐up, and complication management in patients with subcutaneous ICD. Regarding particular issues like the necessity for shock efficacy testing, or the clinical outcome as compared to transvenous ICD, randomized data are expected in the near future.

          Related collections

          Most cited references 44

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Transvenous lead extraction: Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus on facilities, training, indications, and patient management: this document was endorsed by the American Heart Association (AHA).

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            2017 HRS expert consensus statement on cardiovascular implantable electronic device lead management and extraction

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Cardioverter defibrillator implantation without induction of ventricular fibrillation: a single-blind, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial (SIMPLE).

              Defibrillation testing by induction and termination of ventricular fibrillation is widely done at the time of implantation of implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs). We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of ICD implantation without defibrillation testing versus the standard of ICD implantation with defibrillation testing.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                christoph.schukro@meduniwien.ac.at
                Journal
                Clin Cardiol
                Clin Cardiol
                10.1002/(ISSN)1932-8737
                CLC
                Clinical Cardiology
                Wiley Periodicals, Inc. (New York )
                0160-9289
                1932-8737
                14 August 2020
                October 2020
                : 43
                : 10 ( doiID: 10.1002/clc.v43.10 )
                : 1084-1092
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Department of Internal Medicine II, Division of Cardiology Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria
                [ 2 ] Department of Cardiac Surgery University Hospital Basel Basel Switzerland
                [ 3 ] Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiology Medical University of Graz Graz Austria
                [ 4 ] Department of Internal Medicine III Medical University of Innsbruck Innsbruck Austria
                [ 5 ] Department of Internal Medicine I Ordensklinikum Linz Elisabethinen Hospital Linz Austria
                [ 6 ] Department of Internal Medicine III Wiener Neustadt State Hospital Wiener Neustadt Austria
                [ 7 ] Department of Internal Medicine III University Hospital St. Pölten Austria
                [ 8 ] Department of Internal Medicine I Kepler University Hospital Linz Linz Austria
                [ 9 ] Department of Internal Medicine III Wilhelminen Hospital Vienna Vienna Austria
                [ 10 ] Department of Arrhythmias and Cardiac Pacing National Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases and Slovak Medical University Bratislava Slovakia
                [ 11 ] Department of Surgery, Division of Cardiac Surgery Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria
                Author notes
                [* ] Correspondence

                Christoph Schukro, MD, PhD, FESC, Department of Internal Medicine II, Division of Cardiology, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18‐20, 1090 Vienna, Austria,

                Email: christoph.schukro@ 123456meduniwien.ac.at

                Article
                CLC23432
                10.1002/clc.23432
                7533987
                32794309
                © 2020 The Authors. Clinical Cardiology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                Page count
                Figures: 2, Tables: 1, Pages: 9, Words: 7390
                Product
                Categories
                Review
                Reviews
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                October 2020
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:5.9.1 mode:remove_FC converted:05.10.2020

                Comments

                Comment on this article