11
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Developmental Prosopagnosia and Elastic Versus Static Face Recognition in an Incidental Learning Task

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Previous research on the beneficial effect of motion has postulated that learning a face in motion provides additional cues to recognition. Surprisingly, however, few studies have examined the beneficial effect of motion in an incidental learning task and developmental prosopagnosia (DP) even though such studies could provide more valuable information about everyday face recognition compared to the perception of static faces. In the current study, 18 young adults (Experiment 1) and five DPs and 10 age-matched controls (Experiment 2) participated in an incidental learning task during which both static and elastically moving unfamiliar faces were sequentially presented and were to be recognized in a delayed visual search task during which the faces could either keep their original presentation or switch (from static to elastically moving or vice versa). In Experiment 1, performance in the elastic-elastic condition reached a significant improvement relative to the elastic-static and static-elastic condition, however, no significant difference could be detected relative to the static-static condition. Except for higher scores in the elastic-elastic compared to the static-elastic condition in the age-matched group, no other significant differences were detected between conditions for both the DPs and the age-matched controls. The current study could not provide compelling evidence for a general beneficial effect of motion. Age-matched controls performed generally worse than DPs, which may potentially be explained by their higher rates of false alarms. Factors that could have influenced the results are discussed.

          Related collections

          Most cited references71

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The many faces of configural processing.

          Adults' expertise in recognizing faces has been attributed to configural processing. We distinguish three types of configural processing: detecting the first-order relations that define faces (i.e. two eyes above a nose and mouth), holistic processing (glueing the features together into a gestalt), and processing second-order relations (i.e. the spacing among features). We provide evidence for their separability based on behavioral marker tasks, their sensitivity to experimental manipulations, and their patterns of development. We note that inversion affects each type of configural processing, not just sensitivity to second-order relations, and we review evidence on whether configural processing is unique to faces.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            How sample size influences research outcomes

            Sample size calculation is part of the early stages of conducting an epidemiological, clinical or lab study. In preparing a scientific paper, there are ethical and methodological indications for its use. Two investigations conducted with the same methodology and achieving equivalent results, but different only in terms of sample size, may point the researcher in different directions when it comes to making clinical decisions. Therefore, ideally, samples should not be small and, contrary to what one might think, should not be excessive. The aim of this paper is to discuss in clinical language the main implications of the sample size when interpreting a study.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Social Psychological Face Perception: Why Appearance Matters.

              We form first impressions from faces despite warnings not to do so. Moreover, there is considerable agreement in our impressions, which carry significant social outcomes. Appearance matters because some facial qualities are so useful in guiding adaptive behavior that even a trace of those qualities can create an impression. Specifically, the qualities revealed by facial cues that characterize low fitness, babies, emotion, and identity are overgeneralized to people whose facial appearance resembles the unfit (anomalous face overgeneralization), babies (babyface overgeneralization), a particular emotion (emotion face overgeneralization), or a particular identity (familiar face overgeneralization). We review studies that support the overgeneralization hypotheses and recommend research that incorporates additional tenets of the ecological theory from which these hypotheses are derived: the contribution of dynamic and multi-modal stimulus information to face perception; bidirectional relationships between behavior and face perception; perceptual learning mechanisms and social goals that sensitize perceivers to particular information in faces.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Psychol
                Front Psychol
                Front. Psychol.
                Frontiers in Psychology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-1078
                31 August 2020
                2020
                : 11
                : 2098
                Affiliations
                Brain and Cognition, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, KU Leuven , Leuven, Belgium
                Author notes

                Edited by: Marien Gadea, University of Valencia, Spain

                Reviewed by: Fabrizio Stasolla, Giustino Fortunato University, Italy; Marta Aliño Costa, Valencian International University, Spain

                *Correspondence: Karl Verfaillie, karl.verfaillie@ 123456psy.kuleuven.be

                This article was submitted to Neuropsychology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology

                Article
                10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02098
                7488957
                32982859
                898f53a1-190d-4927-823f-6dfe9e42d935
                Copyright © 2020 Bylemans, Vrancken and Verfaillie.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 28 February 2020
                : 28 July 2020
                Page count
                Figures: 4, Tables: 0, Equations: 0, References: 97, Pages: 12, Words: 10366
                Funding
                Funded by: Scientific Research Flanders
                Award ID: G.0810.13
                Categories
                Psychology
                Original Research

                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                face perception,moving vs. static faces,developmental prosopagnosia,visual learning,incidental learning

                Comments

                Comment on this article