2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Association between the number of prehospital defibrillation attempts and neurologic outcomes in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients without on-scene return of spontaneous circulation

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective

          Delivery of prehospital defibrillation for shockable rhythms by emergency medical service providers is crucial for successful resuscitation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients. The optimal range of prehospital defibrillation attempts for refractory shockable rhythms is unknown. This study evaluated the association between the number of prehospital defibrillation attempts and neurologic outcomes in OHCA patients.

          Methods

          A retrospective observational study was conducted using the nationwide OHCA registry. Adult OHCA patients who were treated by emergency medical service providers due to presumed cardiac origin with initial shockable rhythm were enrolled from 2013 to 2016. The final analysis was performed on patients without on-scene return of spontaneous circulation. The number of prehospital defibrillation attempts was categorized as follows: 2–3, 4–5, and ≥6 attempts. The primary outcome was a good neurologic recovery at hospital discharge. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate the association between neurologic outcomes and the number of prehospital defibrillation attempts.

          Results

          A total of 4,513 patients were included in the final analysis. The numbers of patients for whom 2–3, 4–5, and ≥6 defibrillation attempts were made were 2,720 (60.3%), 1,090 (24.2%), and 703 (15.5%), respectively. Poorer outcomes were associated with ≥6 defibrillation attempts: survival to hospital discharge (adjusted odds ratio, 0.38; 95% confidence interval, 0.21–0.65) and good neurologic recovery (adjusted odds ratio, 0.42; 95% confidence interval, 0.21–0.84).

          Conclusion

          Six or more prehospital defibrillation attempts were associated with poorer neurologic outcomes in OHCA patients with an initial shockable rhythm who were unresponsive to on-scene defibrillation and resuscitation.

          Related collections

          Most cited references30

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2015: Section 3. Adult advanced life support.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Cardiopulmonary resuscitation with assisted extracorporeal life-support versus conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation in adults with in-hospital cardiac arrest: an observational study and propensity analysis.

            Extracorporeal life-support as an adjunct to cardiac resuscitation has shown encouraging outcomes in patients with cardiac arrest. However, there is little evidence about the benefit of the procedure compared with conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), especially when continued for more than 10 min. We aimed to assess whether extracorporeal CPR was better than conventional CPR for patients with in-hospital cardiac arrest of cardiac origin. We did a 3-year prospective observational study on the use of extracorporeal life-support for patients aged 18-75 years with witnessed in-hospital cardiac arrest of cardiac origin undergoing CPR of more than 10 min compared with patients receiving conventional CPR. A matching process based on propensity-score was done to equalise potential prognostic factors in both groups, and to formulate a balanced 1:1 matched cohort study. The primary endpoint was survival to hospital discharge, and analysis was by intention to treat. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00173615. Of the 975 patients with in-hospital cardiac arrest events who underwent CPR for longer than 10 min, 113 were enrolled in the conventional CPR group and 59 were enrolled in the extracorporeal CPR group. Unmatched patients who underwent extracorporeal CPR had a higher survival rate to discharge (log-rank p<0.0001) and a better 1-year survival than those who received conventional CPR (log rank p=0.007). Between the propensity-score matched groups, there was still a significant difference in survival to discharge (hazard ratio [HR] 0.51, 95% CI 0.35-0.74, p<0.0001), 30-day survival (HR 0.47, 95% CI 0.28-0.77, p=0.003), and 1-year survival (HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.33-0.83, p=0.006) favouring extracorporeal CPR over conventional CPR. Extracorporeal CPR had a short-term and long-term survival benefit over conventional CPR in patients with in-hospital cardiac arrest of cardiac origin.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Part 5: Adult Basic Life Support and Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Quality: 2015 American Heart Association Guidelines Update for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Clin Exp Emerg Med
                Clin Exp Emerg Med
                CEEM
                Clinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine
                The Korean Society of Emergency Medicine
                2383-4625
                March 2021
                31 March 2021
                : 8
                : 1
                : 21-29
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Emergency Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
                [2 ]Department of Emergency Medicine, Seoul National University Seoul Metropolitan Government Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
                [3 ]Department of Emergency Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea
                Author notes
                Correspondence to: Tae Han Kim Department of Emergency Medicine, Seoul National University Seoul Metropolitan Government Boramae Medical Center, 20 Boramae-ro 5-gil, Dongjak-gu, Seoul 07061, Korea E-mail: adoong01@ 123456snu.ac.kr
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3855-081X
                Article
                ceem-20-069
                10.15441/ceem.20.069
                8041578
                33845519
                89c31c30-0ec2-4db8-9f28-9e6a4aea4592
                Copyright © 2021 The Korean Society of Emergency Medicine

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).

                History
                : 9 June 2020
                : 20 July 2020
                : 20 July 2020
                Categories
                Original Article

                defibrillators,emergency medical services,out-of-hospital cardiac arrest,survival

                Comments

                Comment on this article