9
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Rolapitant for the prevention of nausea in patients receiving highly or moderately emetogenic chemotherapy

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Most patients receiving highly or moderately emetogenic chemotherapy experience chemotherapy‐induced nausea and vomiting without antiemetic prophylaxis. While neurokinin‐1 receptor antagonists (NK‐1RAs) effectively prevent emesis, their ability to prevent nausea has not been established. We evaluated the efficacy of the long‐acting NK‐1RA rolapitant in preventing chemotherapy‐induced nausea using post hoc analyses of data from 3 phase 3 trials. Patients were randomized to receive 180 mg oral rolapitant or placebo approximately 1‐2 hours before chemotherapy in combination with a 5‐hydroxytryptamine type 3 RA and dexamethasone. Nausea was assessed by visual analog scale during the acute (≤24 hours), delayed (>24‐120 hours), and overall (0‐120 hours) phases. Post hoc analyses by treatment group (rolapitant vs control) were performed on pooled data within patient subgroups receiving cisplatin‐based, carboplatin‐based, or anthracycline/cyclophosphamide (AC)‐based chemotherapy. In the cisplatin‐based chemotherapy group, significantly more patients receiving rolapitant than control reported no nausea (NN) in the overall (52.3% vs 41.7% [ <  .001]; absolute benefit [AB] = 10.6%), delayed (55.7% vs 44.3% [ <  .001]; AB = 11.4%), and acute (70.5% vs 64.3% [ =  .030]; AB = 6.2%) phases. Similar results were observed in the carboplatin‐based chemotherapy group, with significantly more patients receiving rolapitant than control reporting NN in the overall (62.5% vs 51.2% [ =  .023]; AB = 11.3%) and delayed (64.1% vs 53.6% [ =  .034]; AB = 10.5%) phases. In the AC‐based chemotherapy group, patients receiving rolapitant or control reported similar NN rates during the overall and delayed phases. Rolapitant effectively prevents nausea during the overall and delayed phases in patients receiving cisplatin‐ or carboplatin‐based chemotherapy.

          Related collections

          Most cited references26

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Delayed nausea and vomiting continue to reduce patients' quality of life after highly and moderately emetogenic chemotherapy despite antiemetic treatment.

            Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) are major adverse effects of cancer chemotherapy. We compared the impact of acute (during the first 24 hours postchemotherapy) and delayed (days 2 through 5 postchemotherapy) CINV on patients' quality of life (QoL) after highly or moderately emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC and MEC, respectively). This prospective, multicenter, multinational study was conducted in 14 medical practices on cancer patients undergoing either HEC or MEC treatment. Patients recorded episodes of nausea and vomiting in a diary. Patients completed the Functional Living Index-Emesis (FLIE) questionnaire at baseline and on day 6. A total of 298 patients were assessable (67 HEC patients, 231 MEC patients). Emesis was reported by 36.4% of patients (13.2% acute, 32.5% delayed) and nausea by 59.7% (36.2% acute, 54.3% delayed). HEC patients reported significantly lower mean FLIE total score than MEC patients (95.5 v 107.8 respectively; P = .0049). Among all patients, the nausea score was significantly lower than the vomiting score (50.0 and 55.3, respectively; P = .0097). Of the 173 patients who experienced neither vomiting nor nausea during the first 24 hours postchemotherapy, 22.9% reported an impact of CINV on daily life caused by delayed CINV. CINV continues to adversely affect patients' QoL despite antiemetic therapy even after treatment with only moderately emetogenic chemotherapy regimens, and even in the subgroup of patients who do not experience nausea and vomiting during the first 24 hours. On the basis of the FLIE results in this study, nausea had a stronger negative impact on patients' daily lives than vomiting.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Efficacy and tolerability of aprepitant for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in patients with breast cancer after moderately emetogenic chemotherapy.

              This is the first study in which the NK(1)-receptor antagonist, aprepitant (APR), was evaluated for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) with moderately emetogenic chemotherapy. Eligible breast cancer patients were naive to emetogenic chemotherapy and treated with cyclophosphamide +/- doxorubicin or epirubicin. Patients were randomly assigned to either an aprepitant regimen (day 1, APR 125 mg, ondansetron (OND) 8 mg, and dexamethasone 12 mg before chemotherapy and OND 8 mg 8 hours later; days 2 through 3, APR 80 qd) [DOSAGE ERROR CORRECTED] or a control regimen (day 1, OND 8 mg and dexamethasone 20 mg before chemotherapy and OND 8 mg 8 hours later; days 2 through 3, OND 8 mg bid). Data on nausea, vomiting, and use of rescue medication were collected with a self-report diary. The primary efficacy end point was the proportion of patients with complete response, defined as no vomiting and no use of rescue therapy, during 120 hours after initiation of chemotherapy in cycle 1. The secondary end point was the proportion of patients with an average item score higher than 6 of 7 on the Functional Living Index-Emesis questionnaire. Of 866 patients randomized, 857 patients (99%) were assessable. Overall complete response was greater with the aprepitant regimen than with the control regimen (50.8% v 42.5%; P = .015). More patients in the aprepitant group reported minimal or no impact of CINV on daily life (63.5% v 55.6%; P = .019). Both treatments were generally well tolerated. The aprepitant regimen was more effective than the control regimen for prevention of CINV in patients receiving both an anthracycline and cyclophosphamide.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                rnavari@uabmc.edu
                Journal
                Cancer Med
                Cancer Med
                10.1002/(ISSN)2045-7634
                CAM4
                Cancer Medicine
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                2045-7634
                23 May 2018
                July 2018
                : 7
                : 7 ( doiID: 10.1002/cam4.2018.7.issue-7 )
                : 2943-2950
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] University of Alabama Birmingham School of Medicine Birmingham AL USA
                [ 2 ] Medical Oncology Centre of Rosebank Johannesburg South Africa
                [ 3 ] Department of Immunology Faculty of Health Science University of Pretoria Pretoria South Africa
                [ 4 ] TESARO, Inc. Waltham MA USA
                [ 5 ] University of Kansas Cancer Center Westwood KS USA
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence

                Rudolph M. Navari, University of Alabama Birmingham School of Medicine, Birmingham, AL, USA.

                Email: rnavari@ 123456uabmc.edu

                Article
                CAM41560
                10.1002/cam4.1560
                6051205
                29790666
                89c541b3-218e-447f-be3c-f28b4830eef9
                © 2018 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 05 April 2018
                : 11 April 2018
                : 28 April 2018
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 5, Pages: 8, Words: 5530
                Funding
                Funded by: TESARO, Inc.
                Categories
                Original Research
                Clinical Cancer Research
                Original Research
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                cam41560
                July 2018
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_NLMPMC version:version=5.4.3 mode:remove_FC converted:18.07.2018

                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                anthracycline/cyclophosphamide,carboplatin,chemotherapy‐induced nausea and vomiting,cisplatin,highly emetogenic chemotherapy,moderately emetogenic chemotherapy,nausea,neurokinin‐1 receptor antagonist,rolapitant

                Comments

                Comment on this article