Blog
About

  • Record: found
  • Abstract: found
  • Article: not found

Characterization of the Chronic Risk and Hazard of Hazardous Air Pollutants in the United States Using Ambient Monitoring Data

Read this article at

ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
Bookmark
      There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

      Abstract

      Background

      Ambient measurements of hazardous air pollutants (air toxics) have been used to validate model-predicted concentrations of air toxics but have not been used to perform risk screening at the national level.

      Objectives

      We used ambient concentrations of routinely measured air toxics to determine the relative importance of individual air toxics for chronic cancer and noncancer exposures.

      Methods

      We compiled 3-year averages for ambient measurement of air toxics collected at monitoring locations in the United States from 2003 through 2005. We then used national distributions of risk-weighted concentrations to identify the air toxics of most concern.

      Results

      Concentrations of benzene, carbon tetrachloride, arsenic, 1,3-butadiene, and acetaldehyde were above the 10 −6 cancer risk level at most sites nationally with a high degree of confidence. Concentrations of tetrachloroethylene, ethylene oxide, acrylonitrile, and 1,4-dichlorobenzene were also often greater than the 10 −6 cancer risk level, but we have less confidence in the estimated risk associated with these pollutants. Formaldehyde and chromium VI concentrations were either above or below the 10 −6 cancer risk level, depending on the choice of agency-recommended 10 −6 level. The method detection limits of eight additional pollutants were too high to rule out that concentrations were above the 10 −6 cancer risk level. Concentrations of 52 compounds compared with chronic noncancer benchmarks indicated that only acrolein concentrations were greater than the noncancer reference concentration at most monitoring sites.

      Conclusions

      Most pollutants with national site-level averages greater than health benchmarks were also pollutants of concern identified in modeled national-scale risk assessments. Current monitoring networks need more sensitive ambient measurement techniques to better characterize the air toxics problem in the United States.

      Related collections

      Most cited references 23

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Spatial and monthly trends in speciated fine particle concentration in the United States

        Bookmark
        • Record: found
        • Abstract: not found
        • Article: not found

        Risk Assessment in the Federal Government: Managing the Process

        (1983)
          Bookmark
          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          National estimates of outdoor air toxics concentrations.

          The Clean Air Act identifies 189 hazardous air pollutants (HAPs), or "air toxics," associated with a wide range of adverse human health effects. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has conducted a modeling study with the Assessment System for Population Exposure Nationwide (ASPEN) to gain a greater understanding of the spatial distribution of concentrations of these HAPs resulting from contributions of multiple emission sources. The study estimates year 1990 long-term outdoor concentrations of 148 air toxics for each census tract in the continental United States, utilizing a Gaussian air dispersion modeling approach. Ratios of median national modeled concentrations to estimated emissions indicate that emission totals without consideration of emission source type can be a misleading indicator of air quality. The results also indicate priorities for improvements in modeling methodology and emissions identification. Model performance evaluation suggests a tendency for underprediction of observed concentrations, which is likely due, at least in part, to a number of limitations of the Gaussian modeling formulation. Emissions estimates for HAPs have a high degree of uncertainty and contribute to discrepancies between modeled and monitored concentration estimates. The model's ranking of concentrations among monitoring sites is reasonably good for most of the gaseous HAPs evaluated, with ranking accuracy ranging from 66 to 100%.
            Bookmark

            Author and article information

            Affiliations
            Sonoma Technology, Inc., Petaluma, California, USA
            Author notes
            Address correspondence to M.C. McCarthy, Sonoma Technology, Inc., 1455 N. McDowell Blvd., Petaluma, CA 94954-6503 USA. Telephone: (707) 665-9900. Fax: (707) 665-9800. E-mail: mmccarthy@ 123456sonomatech.com
            [*]

            Current address: Department of Land, Air and Water Resources, University of California, Davis, Davis, California.

            M.C.M., T.E.O., and H.R.H. have all been employed at STI for > 5 years, and J.G.C. is now a student at UC Davis. STI consults for federal, state, and local agencies (e.g., Southeastern States Air Resources Managers, Arizona Department of Environmental Quality) on this topic.

            Journal
            Environ Health Perspect
            Environmental Health Perspectives
            National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences
            0091-6765
            1552-9924
            May 2009
            9 January 2009
            : 117
            : 5
            : 790-796
            2685843
            19479023
            10.1289/ehp.11861
            ehp-117-790
            This is an Open Access article: verbatim copying and redistribution of this article are permitted in all media for any purpose, provided this notice is preserved along with the article's original DOI.
            Categories
            Research

            Comments

            Comment on this article