10
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      What is known about human milk bank donors around the world: a systematic scoping review

      review-article
      , * ,
      Public Health Nutrition
      Cambridge University Press
      Milk banking, Donors, Human milk, Donor milk

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective:

          The WHO recommends that low birth weight infants receive donor human milk (DHM) when mother’s milk is not available. Systematic reviews have been published regarding clinical outcomes of infants receiving DHM, as well as the impact of pasteurisation on the composition of DHM; however, information about milk bank donors has not been systematically assessed.

          Design:

          We conducted a systematic scoping review of original research articles about milk bank donors published before August 2020.

          Setting:

          Globally.

          Participants:

          Donors to milk banks.

          Results:

          A total of twenty-eight studies were included across a variety of geographies: the USA ( n 8), Brazil ( n 7), Spain ( n 4), India ( n 2), and single studies in France, Norway, Poland, Italy, Taiwan, Korea and China. Study variables were grouped into six main categories: Donor Demographics ( n 19), Clinical Characteristics ( n 20), Donor Experiences ( n 16), Donation Patterns ( n 16), Lifestyle Characteristics ( n 4) and Lactation/Breast-feeding History ( n 8). Some demographic characteristics were commonly reported across regions, while other, including gender and race, were infrequently explored. Factors that might influence the composition of DHM, including birth timing (term or pre-term), milk type (colostrum, transition or mature) and maternal diet were not regularly studied. Other gaps in the literature included (1) donors’ motivations and barriers to donation, (2) lactation and breast-feeding history, including factors that influence donors to pump and amass surplus milk, and (3) donation patterns, including whether donors are also selling milk to corporations or sharing milk with peers.

          Conclusion:

          What is known about milk bank donors in different geographies is often limited to a single study, with heterogeneity in the variables reported.

          Related collections

          Most cited references42

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Response rates and responsiveness for surveys, standards, and the Journal.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Human milk for the premature infant.

              Premature infants are at risk for growth failure, developmental delays, necrotizing enterocolitis, and late-onset sepsis. Human milk from women delivering prematurely has more protein and higher levels of bioactive molecules. Human milk must be fortified for premature infants to achieve adequate growth. Mother's own milk improves growth and neurodevelopment, decreases the risk of necrotizing enterocolitis and late-onset sepsis, and should be the primary enteral diet for premature infants. Donor milk is a resource for premature infants whose mothers are unable to provide an adequate supply of milk. Challenges include the need for pasteurization, nutritional and biochemical deficiencies, and limited supply. Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Public Health Nutr
                Public Health Nutr
                PHN
                Public Health Nutrition
                Cambridge University Press (Cambridge, UK )
                1368-9800
                1475-2727
                February 2022
                13 September 2021
                : 25
                : 2
                : 312-322
                Affiliations
                Nutrition Department, University of North Carolina Greensboro , 319 College Avenue, 318 Stone Building, Greensboro, NC 27412, USA
                Author notes
                [* ] Corresponding author: Email mtperrin@ 123456uncg.edu
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1645-8310
                Article
                S1368980021003979
                10.1017/S1368980021003979
                8883786
                34509177
                8a354cf3-ac70-44ff-b0ed-557d4c00e84a
                © The Authors 2021

                This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 27 April 2021
                : 06 August 2021
                : 09 September 2021
                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 7, References: 50, Pages: 11
                Categories
                Scoping Review
                Behavioural Nutrition

                Public health
                milk banking,donors,human milk,donor milk
                Public health
                milk banking, donors, human milk, donor milk

                Comments

                Comment on this article