59
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The effect of transcranial direct current stimulation: a role for cortical excitation/inhibition balance?

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a promising tool for cognitive enhancement and neurorehabilitation in clinical disorders in both cognitive and clinical domains (e.g., chronic pain, tinnitus). Here we suggest the potential role of tDCS in modulating cortical excitation/inhibition (E/I) balance and thereby inducing improvements. We suggest that part of the mechanism of action of tDCS can be explained by non-invasive modulations of the E/I balance.

          Related collections

          Most cited references42

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Neocortical excitation/inhibition balance in information processing and social dysfunction.

          Severe behavioural deficits in psychiatric diseases such as autism and schizophrenia have been hypothesized to arise from elevations in the cellular balance of excitation and inhibition (E/I balance) within neural microcircuitry. This hypothesis could unify diverse streams of pathophysiological and genetic evidence, but has not been susceptible to direct testing. Here we design and use several novel optogenetic tools to causally investigate the cellular E/I balance hypothesis in freely moving mammals, and explore the associated circuit physiology. Elevation, but not reduction, of cellular E/I balance within the mouse medial prefrontal cortex was found to elicit a profound impairment in cellular information processing, associated with specific behavioural impairments and increased high-frequency power in the 30-80 Hz range, which have both been observed in clinical conditions in humans. Consistent with the E/I balance hypothesis, compensatory elevation of inhibitory cell excitability partially rescued social deficits caused by E/I balance elevation. These results provide support for the elevated cellular E/I balance hypothesis of severe neuropsychiatric disease-related symptoms.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Model of autism: increased ratio of excitation/inhibition in key neural systems.

            Autism is a severe neurobehavioral syndrome, arising largely as an inherited disorder, which can arise from several diseases. Despite recent advances in identifying some genes that can cause autism, its underlying neurological mechanisms are uncertain. Autism is best conceptualized by considering the neural systems that may be defective in autistic individuals. Recent advances in understanding neural systems that process sensory information, various types of memories and social and emotional behaviors are reviewed and compared with known abnormalities in autism. Then, specific genetic abnormalities that are linked with autism are examined. Synthesis of this information leads to a model that postulates that some forms of autism are caused by an increased ratio of excitation/inhibition in sensory, mnemonic, social and emotional systems. The model further postulates that the increased ratio of excitation/inhibition can be caused by combinatorial effects of genetic and environmental variables that impinge upon a given neural system. Furthermore, the model suggests potential therapeutic interventions.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              tDCS polarity effects in motor and cognitive domains: a meta-analytical review.

              In vivo effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) have attracted much attention nowadays as this area of research spreads to both the motor and cognitive domains. The common assumption is that the anode electrode causes an enhancement of cortical excitability during stimulation, which then lasts for a few minutes thereafter, while the cathode electrode generates the opposite effect, i.e., anodal-excitation and cathodal-inhibition effects (AeCi). Yet, this dual-polarity effect has not been observed in all tDCS studies. Here, we conducted a meta-analytical review aimed to investigate the homogeneity/heterogeneity of the effect sizes of the AeCi dichotomy in both motor and cognitive functions. The AeCi effect was found to occur quite commonly with motor investigations and rarely in cognitive studies. When the anode electrode is applied over a non-motor area, in most cases, it will cause an excitation as measured by a relevant cognitive or perceptual task; however, the cathode electrode rarely causes an inhibition. We found homogeneity in motor studies and heterogeneity in cognitive studies with the electrode's polarity serving as a moderator that can explain the source of heterogeneity in cognitive studies. The lack of inhibitory cathodal effects might reflect compensation processes as cognitive functions are typically supported by rich brain networks. Further insights as to the polarity and domain interaction are offered, including subdivision to different classes of cognitive functions according to their likelihood of being affected by stimulation.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Front Hum Neurosci
                Front Hum Neurosci
                Front. Hum. Neurosci.
                Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1662-5161
                24 September 2013
                2013
                : 7
                : 602
                Affiliations
                [1]1Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK
                [2]2Division of Neurosciences, Pablo de Olavide University Seville, Spain
                Author notes

                Marom Bikson, The City College of New York of The City University of New York, USA

                Flavio Frohlich, University of North Carolina - Chapel Hill, USA; Davide Reato, The City College of The City University of New York, USA

                *Correspondence: Beatrix Krause, Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, 9 South Parks Road, Oxford, Oxfordshire, OXI 3UD, UK e-mail: beatrix.krause@ 123456psy.ox.ac.uk

                This article was submitted to the journal Frontiers in Human Neuroscience.

                Article
                10.3389/fnhum.2013.00602
                3781319
                24068995
                8a392c14-5f4a-4829-b609-92c2ff144469
                Copyright © 2013 Krause, Márquez-Ruiz and Cohen Kadosh.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 14 June 2013
                : 04 September 2013
                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 0, Equations: 0, References: 53, Pages: 4, Words: 3519
                Categories
                Neuroscience
                Mini Review Article

                Neurosciences
                transcranial direct current stimulation (tdcs),excitation,inhibition,gaba,glutamate,cognition

                Comments

                Comment on this article