16
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Influência do nível de força máxima na produção e manutenção da potência muscular Translated title: Influence of maximum strength on muscle power production and endurance

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Indivíduos mais fortes (com nível mais elevado de força máxima, Fmax) demonstram menor resistência de força que indivíduos mais fracos (com nível mais baixo de Fmax) em uma mesma intensidade relativa. Como o nível de Fmax influencia a produção de potência, espera-se que sujeitos mais fortes também apresentem uma menor resistência de potência. O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar a influência do nível de Fmax na produção e na resistência de potência durante repetições e séries múltiplas do exercício meio-agachamento. Quarenta e dois sujeitos foram classificados de acordo com o resultado no teste de força dinâmica máxima (1RM) e destes os 10 mais fortes e os 10 mais fracos foram selecionados para participar no estudo. Para avaliar a resistência de potência os dois grupos realizaram 10 séries de seis repetições a 40% e a 60% 1RM na maior velocidade possível. A potência absoluta (PA) e a potência relativa ao peso corporal (PR) desenvolvidas na fase concêntrica do exercício foram medidas. A análise de variância (ANOVA two-way) revelou que os sujeitos mais fortes diminuíram a PA a 60% 1RM a partir da quarta repetição e a PR a partir da quinta repetição. Já os sujeitos mais fracos diminuíram a PA apenas na sexta repetição e mantiveram o rendimento na PR ao longo das 10 séries. Não houve efeito significante na intensidade de 40% 1RM. Isso sugere que sujeitos mais fortes fadigam antes em maiores intensidades de carga. Essa fadiga precoce nos sujeitos mais fortes poderia estar ligada a diferentes fatores associados ao controle da homeostase orgânica como o comportamento da pressão arterial, da atividade eletromiográfica e a proporção de fibras musculares dos tipos I e II.

          Translated abstract

          It seems that stronger subjects present less strength endurance compared to weaker subjects at the same relative intensity. Since the level of maximum strength affects power production, it is also expected that stronger subjects present lower power endurance. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of maximum strength on power production and endurance over multiple sets and repetitions of the half-squat exercise. Forty- two subjects were classified according to the result in the 1RM test and the 10 strongest and 10 weakest were selected to participate. In order to evaluate power endurance, both groups performed 10 sets of 6 repetitions at 40% and 60% 1RM as fast as possible. The absolute power (AP) and relative power (RP) (corrected by body weight) developed in half-squat concentric phase were measured. Analysis of variance for repeated measures (Two-Way ANOVA) revealed that the stronger subjects decreased AP from 4th repetition on and RP from 5th repetition on at 60% 1RM. The weakest subjects decreased AP from 6th repetition on and maintained RP production over the ten series. There was no significant effect on 40% 1RM. This result suggests that stronger subjects fatigue first at higher intensities. The early fatigue in stronger subjects could be associated with different factors related to body control of homeostasis such as blood pressure, motor units recruitment and proportion of types I and II muscle fibers.

          Related collections

          Most cited references31

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Muscle strength testing: use of normalisation for body size.

          Assessment of muscle strength tests has been a popular form of testing muscle function in sports and exercises, as well as in other movement-related sciences for several decades. Although the relationship between muscle strength and body size has attracted considerable attention from researchers, this relationship has been often either neglected or incorrectly taken into account when presenting the results from muscle strength tests. Two specific problems have been identified. First, most of the studies have presented strength data either non-normalised for body size, or normalised using inappropriate methods, or even several different normalisations have been applied on the same sets of data. Second, the role of body size in various movement performances has been neglected when functional movement performance was assessed by muscle strength. As a consequence, muscle function, athletic profiles, or functional movement performance assessed by tested muscle strength have been often confounded by the effect of body size. Differences in the normalisation methods applied also do not allow for comparison of the data obtained in different studies. Using the following allometric formula for obtaining index of muscle strength, S, independent of body size (assessed by body mass, m) should be recommended in routine strength testing procedures: The allometric parameter should be either b = 0.67 for muscle force (recorded by a dynamometer), or b = 1 for muscle torque (recorded by an isokinetic apparatus). We also recommend using body-size-independent indices of both muscle strength and movement performance when assessing functional performance from recorded muscle strength or vice versa.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Maximal strength and power, muscle mass, endurance and serum hormones in weightlifters and road cyclists.

            Maximal strength, power, muscle cross-sectional area, maximal and submaximal cycling endurance characteristics and serum hormone concentrations of testosterone, free testosterone and cortisol were examined in three groups of men: weightlifters (n = 11), amateur road cyclists (n = 18) and age-matched controls (n = 12). Weightlifters showed 45-55% higher power values than road cyclists and controls, whereas the differences in maximal strength and muscle mass were only 15% and 20%, respectively. These differences were maintained when average power output was expressed relative to body mass or relative to muscle cross-sectional area. Road cyclists recorded 44% higher maximal workloads, whereas submaximal blood lactate concentration was 50-55% lower with increasing workload than in controls and weightlifters. In road cyclists, workloads associated with blood lactate concentrations of 2 and 4 mmol.l-1 were 50-60% higher and occurred at a higher percentage of maximal workload than in weightlifters or controls. Basal serum total testosterone and free testosterone concentrations were lower in elite amateur cyclists than in age-matched weightlifters or untrained individuals. Significant negative correlations were noted between the individual values of maximal workload, workloads at 2 and 4 mmol.l-1 and the individual values of muscle power output (r = -0.37 to -0.49), as well as the individual basal values of serum total testosterone and free testosterone (r = -0.39 to -0.41). These results indicate that the specific status of the participants with respect to training, resistance or endurance is important for the magnitude of the neuromuscular, physiological and performance differences observed between weightlifters and road cyclists. The results suggest that, in cycling, long-term endurance training may interfere more with the development of muscle power than with the development of maximal strength, probably mediated by long-term cycling-related impairment in anabolic hormonal status.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Limits to maximal performance.

              Body size fundamentally affects maximal locomotor performance in mammals. Comparisons of performances of different-sized animals yield different results if made using relative, rather than absolute scales. Absolute speed may be a reasonable way to evaluate the locomotor performance of an animal that must escape predators in real time. However, comparisons of metabolic power in animals of different size can only be made meaningfully on a mass-specific basis. Numerous factors associated with the mechanics, energetics, and storage of elastic energy during locomotion change with body size, which results in allometric relationships that make the energetic cost of locomotion (alpha Mb-0.3) more expensive for small mammals than for large mammals. Small mammals have lower enzymatic capacities for anaerobic glycolysis (alpha Mb0.15) and higher specific aerobic capacities (alpha Mb-0.13) than large mammals. However, the energetic cost of transport increases more than aerobic power as mammals get smaller. The higher ratio of cost to available power in small mammals may explain why they run more slowly than large mammals, as a rule. Maximum aerobic capacity is allometrically related to body size. Limits to VO2max can be imposed by mitochondrial oxidative capacity, as in goats, or by the O2 transport system, as in humans and horses. No single step in the O2 transport system can limit the flux of O2 by itself; however, in an average non-athletic species of mammal, any of the steps in the system might appear to be the weakest link. In highly aerobic athletic species, and possibly elite athletic individuals of other species (e.g. humans), the malleable elements of the O2 transport system may develop to the point that their O2 transport capacities approach that of the least malleable element in the system, the lung. VO2max is very high in such individuals, and appears to be limited by simultaneous failure of all components of the O2 transport system.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: ND
                Role: ND
                Role: ND
                Role: ND
                Role: ND
                Role: ND
                Journal
                rbme
                Revista Brasileira de Medicina do Esporte
                Rev Bras Med Esporte
                Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina do Exercício e do Esporte (São Paulo )
                1806-9940
                December 2010
                : 16
                : 6
                : 422-426
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Universidade Nove de Julho Brazil
                [2 ] Universidade de São Paulo Brazil
                Article
                S1517-86922010000600005
                10.1590/S1517-86922010000600005
                8a50343a-43dd-4f42-bf52-e97109aa1c46

                http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

                History
                Product

                SciELO Brazil

                Self URI (journal page): http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_serial&pid=1517-8692&lng=en
                Categories
                PHYSIOLOGY
                SPORT SCIENCES

                Sports medicine,Anatomy & Physiology
                fatigue,training load,intermittent activity,fadiga,carga de treinamento,atividade intermitente

                Comments

                Comment on this article