8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Traversing the Aging Research and Health Equity Divide: Toward Intersectional Frameworks of Research Justice and Participation

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Meaningful reductions in racial and ethnic inequities in chronic diseases of aging remain unlikely without major advancements in the inclusion of minoritized populations in aging research. While sparse, studies investigating research participation disparities have predominantly focused on individual-level factors and behavioral change, overlooking the influence of study design, structural factors, and social determinants of health on participation. This is also reflected in conventional practices that consistently fail to address established participation barriers, such as study requirements that impose financial, transportation, linguistic, and/or logistical barriers that disproportionately burden participants belonging to minoritized populations. These shortcomings not only risk exacerbating distrust toward research and researchers, but also introduce significant selection biases, diminishing our ability to detect differential mechanisms of risk, resilience, and response to interventions across subpopulations. This forum article examines the intersecting factors that drive both health inequities in aging and disparate participation in aging research among minoritized populations. Using an intersectional, social justice, and emancipatory lens, we characterize the role of social determinants, historical contexts, and contemporaneous structures in shaping research accessibility and inclusion. We also introduce frameworks to accelerate transformative theoretical approaches to fostering equitable inclusion of minoritized populations in aging research.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Contributors
          (View ORCID Profile)
          (View ORCID Profile)
          (View ORCID Profile)
          Journal
          The Gerontologist
          Oxford University Press (OUP)
          0016-9013
          1758-5341
          July 29 2021
          July 29 2021
          Affiliations
          [1 ]University of Wisconsin-Madison Center for Health Disparities Research, Madison, WI, USA
          [2 ]University of Wisconsin–Madison School of Nursing, Madison, WI, USA
          [3 ]NIA Layton Aging and Alzheimer’s Disease Center, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
          [4 ]Division of Behavioral Sciences, Rush Medical College, Chicago, Illinois, USA
          [5 ]Rush Alzheimer’s Disease Center, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
          [6 ]Community Access, Recruitment, & Engagement (CARE) Research Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
          [7 ]Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
          [8 ]UsAgainstAlzheimer’s, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
          [9 ]University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
          [10 ]Department of Neurology, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York City, New York, USA
          [11 ]Taub Institute for Research on Alzheimer’s Disease and the Aging Brain, Columbia University, New York City, New York, USA
          Article
          10.1093/geront/gnab107
          9154232
          34324633
          8a6d06b0-c6e8-490c-a296-38d7de434013
          © 2021

          https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model

          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article