48
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Community Perceptions of Air Pollution and Related Health Risks in Nairobi Slums

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Air pollution is among the leading global risks for mortality and responsible for increasing risk for chronic diseases. Community perceptions on exposure are critical in determining people’s response and acceptance of related policies. Therefore, understanding people’ perception is critical in informing the design of appropriate intervention measures. The aim of this paper was to establish levels and associations between perceived pollution and health risk perception among slum residents. A cross-sectional study of 5,317 individuals aged 35+ years was conducted in two slums of Nairobi. Association of perceived score and individual characteristics was assessed using linear regression. Spatial variation in the perceived levels was determined through hot spot analysis using ArcGIS. The average perceived air pollution level was higher among residents in Viwandani compared to those in Korogocho. Perceived air pollution level was positively associated with perceived health risks. The majority of respondents were exposed to air pollution in their place of work with 66% exposed to at least two sources of air pollution. Less than 20% of the respondents in both areas mentioned sources related to indoor pollution. The perceived air pollution level and related health risks in the study community were lowamong the residents indicating the need for promoting awareness on air pollution sources and related health risks.

          Related collections

          Most cited references50

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Health effects of fine particulate air pollution: lines that connect.

          Efforts to understand and mitigate thehealth effects of particulate matter (PM) air pollutionhave a rich and interesting history. This review focuseson six substantial lines of research that have been pursued since 1997 that have helped elucidate our understanding about the effects of PM on human health. There hasbeen substantial progress in the evaluation of PM health effects at different time-scales of exposure and in the exploration of the shape of the concentration-response function. There has also been emerging evidence of PM-related cardiovascular health effects and growing knowledge regarding interconnected general pathophysiological pathways that link PM exposure with cardiopulmonary morbidiity and mortality. Despite important gaps in scientific knowledge and continued reasons for some skepticism, a comprehensive evaluation of the research findings provides persuasive evidence that exposure to fine particulate air pollution has adverse effects on cardiopulmonaryhealth. Although much of this research has been motivated by environmental public health policy, these results have important scientific, medical, and public health implications that are broader than debates over legally mandated air quality standards.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Effect of air-pollution control on death rates in Dublin, Ireland: an intervention study.

            Particulate air pollution episodes have been associated with increased daily death. However, there is little direct evidence that diminished particulate air pollution concentrations would lead to reductions in death rates. We assessed the effect of air pollution controls--ie, the ban on coal sales--on particulate air pollution and death rates in Dublin. Concentrations of air pollution and directly-standardised non-trauma, respiratory, and cardiovascular death rates were compared for 72 months before and after the ban of coal sales in Dublin. The effect of the ban on age-standardised death rates was estimated with an interrupted time-series analysis, adjusting for weather, respiratory epidemics, and death rates in the rest of Ireland. Average black smoke concentrations in Dublin declined by 35.6 mg/m(3) (70%) after the ban on coal sales. Adjusted non-trauma death rates decreased by 5.7% (95% CI 4-7, p<0.0001), respiratory deaths by 15.5% (12-19, p<0.0001), and cardiovascular deaths by 10.3% (8-13, p<0.0001). Respiratory and cardiovascular standardised death rates fell coincident with the ban on coal sales. About 116 fewer respiratory deaths and 243 fewer cardiovascular deaths were seen per year in Dublin after the ban. Reductions in respiratory and cardiovascular death rates in Dublin suggest that control of particulate air pollution could substantially diminish daily death. The net benefit of the reduced death rate was greater than predicted from results of previous time-series studies.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Public understandings of air pollution: the ‘localisation’ of environmental risk

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Int J Environ Res Public Health
                Int J Environ Res Public Health
                ijerph
                International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
                MDPI
                1661-7827
                1660-4601
                11 October 2013
                October 2013
                : 10
                : 10
                : 4851-4868
                Affiliations
                [1 ]African Population and Health Research Center, P.O. Box 10787, Nairobi 00100, Kenya; E-Mails: ckyobutungi@ 123456aphrc.org (C.K.); kmuindi@ 123456aphrc.org (K.M.); soti@ 123456aphrc.org (S.O.); svijver@ 123456gmail.com (S.V.)
                [2 ]Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Epidemiology and Global Health, Umeå University, Umeå SE-901 85, Sweden; E-Mails: Nawi.Ng@ 123456epiph.umu.se (N.N.); joacim.rocklov@ 123456envmed.umu.se (J.R.)
                [3 ]Department of Global Health, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Institute for Global Health and Development, Amsterdam 1100 DE, The Netherlands
                [4 ]Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z3, Canada; E-Mail: rettarh@ 123456gmail.com
                Author notes
                [* ] Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mails: tegondi@ 123456aphrc.org or tegondi@ 123456yahoo.co.uk ; Tel.: +254-(20)-400-1000; Fax: +254-(20)-400-1101.
                Article
                ijerph-10-04851
                10.3390/ijerph10104851
                3823347
                24157509
                8a93cf85-0b79-4b6f-b7b1-2c1415193714
                © 2013 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.

                This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).

                History
                : 01 July 2013
                : 09 September 2013
                : 10 September 2013
                Categories
                Article

                Public health
                perceived air quality,air pollution,perceived health risk,urban slum
                Public health
                perceived air quality, air pollution, perceived health risk, urban slum

                Comments

                Comment on this article