12
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Temporal Dynamics of DNA Methylation Patterns in Response to Rearing Juvenile Steelhead ( Oncorhynchus mykiss) in a Hatchery versus Simulated Stream Environment

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Genetic selection is often implicated as the underlying cause of heritable phenotypic differences between hatchery and wild populations of steelhead trout ( Oncorhynchus mykiss) that also differ in lifetime fitness. Developmental plasticity, which can also affect fitness, may be mediated by epigenetic mechanisms such as DNA methylation. Our previous study identified significant differences in DNA methylation between adult hatchery- and natural-origin steelhead from the same population that could not be distinguished by DNA sequence variation. In the current study, we tested whether hatchery-rearing conditions can influence patterns of DNA methylation in steelhead with known genetic backgrounds, and assessed the stability of these changes over time. Eyed-embryos from 22 families of Methow River steelhead were split across traditional hatchery tanks or a simulated stream-rearing environment for 8 months, followed by a second year in a common hatchery tank environment. Family assignments were made using a genetic parentage analysis to account for relatedness among individuals. DNA methylation patterns were examined in the liver, a relatively homogeneous organ that regulates metabolic processes and somatic growth, of juveniles at two time points: after eight months of rearing in either a tank or stream environment and after a subsequent year of rearing in a common tank environment. Further, we analyzed DNA methylation in the sperm of mature 2-year-old males from the earlier described treatments to assess the potential of environmentally-induced changes to be passed to offspring. Hepatic DNA methylation changes in response to hatchery versus stream-rearing in yearling fish were substantial, but few persisted after a second year in the tank environment. However, the early rearing environment appeared to affect how fish responded to developmental and environmental signals during the second year since novel DNA methylation differences were identified in the livers of hatchery versus stream-reared fish after a year of common tank rearing. Furthermore, we found profound differences in DNA methylation due to age, irrespective of rearing treatment. This could be due to smoltification associated changes in liver physiology after the second year of rearing. Although few rearing-treatment effects were observed in the sperm methylome, strong family effects were observed. These data suggest limited potential for intergenerational changes, but highlight the importance of understanding the effects of kinship among studied individuals in order to properly analyze and interpret DNA methylation data in natural populations. Our work is the first to study family effects and temporal dynamics of DNA methylation patterns in response to hatchery-rearing.

          Related collections

          Most cited references85

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Developmental plasticity and human health.

          Many plants and animals are capable of developing in a variety of ways, forming characteristics that are well adapted to the environments in which they are likely to live. In adverse circumstances, for example, small size and slow metabolism can facilitate survival, whereas larger size and more rapid metabolism have advantages for reproductive success when resources are more abundant. Often these characteristics are induced in early life or are even set by cues to which their parents or grandparents were exposed. Individuals developmentally adapted to one environment may, however, be at risk when exposed to another when they are older. The biological evidence may be relevant to the understanding of human development and susceptibility to disease. As the nutritional state of many human mothers has improved around the world, the characteristics of their offspring--such as body size and metabolism--have also changed. Responsiveness to their mothers' condition before birth may generally prepare individuals so that they are best suited to the environment forecast by cues available in early life. Paradoxically, however, rapid improvements in nutrition and other environmental conditions may have damaging effects on the health of those people whose parents and grandparents lived in impoverished conditions. A fuller understanding of patterns of human plasticity in response to early nutrition and other environmental factors will have implications for the administration of public health.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Book: not found

            FastQC: a quality-control tool for high-throughput sequence data.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Genetic effects of captive breeding cause a rapid, cumulative fitness decline in the wild.

              Captive breeding is used to supplement populations of many species that are declining in the wild. The suitability of and long-term species survival from such programs remain largely untested, however. We measured lifetime reproductive success of the first two generations of steelhead trout that were reared in captivity and bred in the wild after they were released. By reconstructing a three-generation pedigree with microsatellite markers, we show that genetic effects of domestication reduce subsequent reproductive capabilities by approximately 40% per captive-reared generation when fish are moved to natural environments. These results suggest that even a few generations of domestication may have negative effects on natural reproduction in the wild and that the repeated use of captive-reared parents to supplement wild populations should be carefully reconsidered.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Genes (Basel)
                Genes (Basel)
                genes
                Genes
                MDPI
                2073-4425
                09 May 2019
                May 2019
                : 10
                : 5
                : 356
                Affiliations
                [1 ]University of Washington, School of Aquatic and Fishery Sciences, 1122 NE Boat St., Seattle, WA 98105, USA; Giles.Goetz@ 123456noaa.gov (G.W.G.); Jon.Dickey@ 123456noaa.gov (J.T.D.)
                [2 ]Conservation Biology Division, Northwest Fisheries Science Center, National Marine Fisheries Service, NOAA, 2725 Montlake Blvd. E., Seattle, WA 98112, USA; Krista.Nichols@ 123456noaa.gov
                [3 ]Environmental and Fisheries Sciences Division, Northwest Fisheries Science Center, National Marine Fisheries Service, NOAA, 7305 Beach Dr. East, Port Orchard, WA 98366, USA; Barry.Berejikian@ 123456noaa.gov (B.A.B.); Chris.P.Tatara@ 123456noaa.gov (C.P.T.)
                [4 ]Conservation Biology Division, Northwest Fisheries Science Center, National Marine Fisheries Service, NOAA, 7305 Beach Dr. East, Port Orchard, WA 98366, USA; Don.Vandoornik@ 123456noaa.gov
                [5 ]Environmental and Fisheries Sciences Division, Northwest Fisheries Science Center, National Marine Fisheries Service, NOAA, 2725 Montlake Blvd. E., Seattle, WA 98112, USA; Penny.Swanson@ 123456noaa.gov
                Author notes
                [* ]Correspondence: Mackenzie.Gavery@ 123456noaa.gov ; Tel.: +1-206-860-3444
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5010-3399
                Article
                genes-10-00356
                10.3390/genes10050356
                6563097
                31075961
                8aa326d6-7a9d-4b56-8d0d-305c80aa9827
                © 2019 by the authors.

                Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 25 March 2019
                : 07 May 2019
                Categories
                Article

                dna methylation,epigenetics,steelhead,hatchery
                dna methylation, epigenetics, steelhead, hatchery

                Comments

                Comment on this article