3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Evaluating Delivery of a CBT-Based Group Intervention for Schoolchildren With Emotional Problems: Examining the Reliability and Applicability of a Video-Based Adherence and Competence Measure

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Adherence and competence are essential parts of program fidelity and having adequate measures to assess these constructs is important. The Competence and Adherence Scale for Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CAS CBT) was developed to evaluate the delivery of cognitive therapies for children with clinical anxiety. The present study is an assessment of the slightly adapted version of the CAS CBT evaluating the delivery of a Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT)-based preventive group intervention: EMOTION: Kids Coping with Anxiety and Depression. This study was part of a Norwegian cluster randomized controlled trial (cRCT) investigating the effectiveness of a transdiagnostic intervention, the EMOTION program—an indicated prevention program targeting anxious and depressive symptoms. The applicability and psychometric properties of the CAS CBT were explored. Results are based on six raters evaluating 239 video-recorded sessions of the EMOTION program being delivered by 68 trained group leaders from different municipal services. Interrater reliability (intraclass correlation coefficients, ICC [3, 1]) indicated fair to good agreement between raters. Internal consistency of the instrument's key domains was calculated using the Omega coefficient which ranged between 0.70 to 0.94. There was a strong association between the two scales Adherence and Competence, and inter-item correlations were high across the items, except for the items rating the adherence to the session goals. Competence and Adherence Scale for Cognitive Behavioral Therapy is a brief measure for use in first-line services, with some promising features for easily assessing program fidelity, but some of the results indicated that the instrument should be improved. Future attention should also be made to adapt the instrument to fit better within a group setting, especially regarding evaluation of session goals. More research on how to adequately evaluate fidelity measures are also warranted.

          Clinical Trial Registration: www.ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT02340637.

          Related collections

          Most cited references66

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability.

            Reliability coefficients often take the form of intraclass correlation coefficients. In this article, guidelines are given for choosing among six different forms of the intraclass correlation for reliability studies in which n target are rated by k judges. Relevant to the choice of the coefficient are the appropriate statistical model for the reliability and the application to be made of the reliability results. Confidence intervals for each of the forms are reviewed.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Implementation matters: a review of research on the influence of implementation on program outcomes and the factors affecting implementation.

              The first purpose of this review was to assess the impact of implementation on program outcomes, and the second purpose was to identify factors affecting the implementation process. Results from over quantitative 500 studies offered strong empirical support to the conclusion that the level of implementation affects the outcomes obtained in promotion and prevention programs. Findings from 81 additional reports indicate there are at least 23 contextual factors that influence implementation. The implementation process is affected by variables related to communities, providers and innovations, and aspects of the prevention delivery system (i.e., organizational functioning) and the prevention support system (i.e., training and technical assistance). The collection of implementation data is an essential feature of program evaluations, and more information is needed on which and how various factors influence implementation in different community settings.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Psychol
                Front Psychol
                Front. Psychol.
                Frontiers in Psychology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-1078
                28 June 2021
                2021
                : 12
                : 702565
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Regional Centre for Child and Youth Mental Health and Child Welfare, Faculty of Health Sciences, UiT the Arctic University of Norway , Tromsø, Norway
                [2] 2Centre for Child and Adolescent Mental Health , Oslo, Norway
                [3] 3Department of Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Oslo , Oslo, Norway
                [4] 4Regional Centre for Child and Youth Mental Health and Child Welfare, Department of Mental Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, NTNU - Norwegian University of Science and Technology , Trondheim, Norway
                [5] 5Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, St. Olavs University Hospital , Trondheim, Norway
                Author notes

                Edited by: Mireia Orgilés, Miguel Hernández University of Elche, Spain

                Reviewed by: Alexandra Morales, Miguel Hernández University of Elche, Spain; Carolina Gonzálvez, University of Alicante, Spain

                *Correspondence: Lene-Mari Potulski Rasmussen lene-mari.p.rasmussen@ 123456uit.no

                This article was submitted to Psychology for Clinical Settings, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology

                Article
                10.3389/fpsyg.2021.702565
                8273386
                34262514
                8ac2da77-1715-4953-9a66-4f1be476e352
                Copyright © 2021 Rasmussen, Patras, Handegård, Neumer, Martinsen, Adolfsen, Sund and Martinussen.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 29 April 2021
                : 31 May 2021
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 4, Equations: 0, References: 66, Pages: 12, Words: 10079
                Categories
                Psychology
                Original Research

                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                youths,emotional problems,program fidelity,reliability,applicability,adherence,competence,group intervention

                Comments

                Comment on this article