54
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Core Stability Exercise Versus General Exercise for Chronic Low Back Pain

      1 , 2 , 2 , 2
      Journal of Athletic Training
      Journal of Athletic Training/NATA

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          <div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="st1"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d726796e123">Reference:</h5> <p id="d726796e125">Wang XQ, Zheng JJ, Yu ZW, et al. A meta-analysis of core stability exercise versus general exercise for chronic low back pain. <i>PLoS One</i>. 2012;7(12):e52082. </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="st2"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d726796e131">Clinical Questions:</h5> <p id="d726796e133">Is core stability exercise more effective than general exercise in the treatment of patients with nonspecific low back pain (LBP)? </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="st3"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d726796e136">Data Sources:</h5> <p id="d726796e138">The authors searched the following databases: China Biological Medicine disc, Cochrane Library, Embase, and PubMed from 1970 through 2011. The key medical subject headings searched were <i>chronic pain</i>, <i>exercise</i>, <i>LBP</i>, <i>lumbosacral region</i>, and <i>sciatica</i>. </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="st4"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d726796e156">Study Selection:</h5> <p id="d726796e158">Randomized controlled trials comparing core stability exercise with general exercise in the treatment of chronic LBP were investigated. Participants were male and female adults with LBP for at least 3 months that was not caused by a specific known condition. A control group receiving general exercise and an experimental group receiving core stability exercise were required for inclusion in the meta-analysis. <i>Core stability</i> was defined as the ability to ensure a stable neutral spine position, but the type of exercise was not specified. Outcome measures of pain intensity, back-specific functional status, quality of life, and work absenteeism were recorded at 3-, 6-, and 12-month intervals. </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="st5"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d726796e164">Data Extraction:</h5> <p id="d726796e166">The study design, participant information, description of interventions in the control and experimental groups, outcome measures, and follow-up period were extracted. The mean difference (MD) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated to evaluate statistical significance. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration Recommendations, and all articles were rated as high risk for other bias with no further explanation given. </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="st6"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d726796e169">Main Results:</h5> <p id="d726796e171">Five studies involving 414 patients were included. Four studies assessed pain intensity using the visual analog scale or numeric rating scale. In the core stability exercise group, the reduction in pain was significant at 3 months (MD = −1.29, 95% CI = −2.47, −0.11; <i>P</i> = .003) but not at 6 months (MD = −0.50, 95% CI = −1.36, 0.35; <i>P</i> = .26). Functional status was improved at 3 months (MD = −7.14, 95% CI = −11.64, −2.65; <i>P</i> = .002) but not at 6 months (MD = −0.50, 95% CI = 0.36, 0.35; <i>P</i> = .26) or 12 months (MD = −0.32, 95% CI = −0.87, 0.23; <i>P</i> = .25). All of the included studies assessed back-specific functional status: 4 used the Oswestry Disability Index and 1 used the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire. Patients in the core stability exercise groups experienced improved functional status versus the general exercise group at 3 months (MD = −7.14, 95% CI = −11.64, −2.65; <i>P</i> = .002); no results were recorded at 6 or 12 months. </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="st7"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d726796e193">Conclusions:</h5> <p id="d726796e195">In the short term, core stability exercise was more effective than general exercise for decreasing pain and increasing back-specific functional status in patients with LBP. </p> </div>

          Related collections

          Most cited references5

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Deficits in neuromuscular control of the trunk predict knee injury risk: a prospective biomechanical-epidemiologic study.

          Female athletes are at significantly greater risk of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury than male athletes in the same high-risk sports. Decreased trunk (core) neuromuscular control may compromise dynamic knee stability. (1) Increased trunk displacement after sudden force release would be associated with increased knee injury risk; (2) coronal (lateral), not sagittal, plane displacement would be the strongest predictor of knee ligament injury; (3) logistic regression of factors related to core stability would accurately predict knee, ligament, and ACL injury risk; and (4) the predictive value of these models would differ between genders. Cohort study (prognosis); Level of evidence, 2. In this study, 277 collegiate athletes (140 female and 137 male) were prospectively tested for trunk displacement after a sudden force release. Analysis of variance and multivariate logistic regression identified predictors of risk in athletes who sustained knee injury. Twenty-five athletes (11 female and 14 male) sustained knee injuries over a 3-year period. Trunk displacement was greater in athletes with knee, ligament, and ACL injuries than in uninjured athletes (P < .05). Lateral displacement was the strongest predictor of ligament injury (P = .009). A logistic regression model, consisting of trunk displacements, proprioception, and history of low back pain, predicted knee ligament injury with 91% sensitivity and 68% specificity (P = .001). This model predicted knee, ligament, and ACL injury risk in female athletes with 84%, 89%, and 91% accuracy, but only history of low back pain was a significant predictor of knee ligament injury risk in male athletes. Factors related to core stability predicted risk of athletic knee, ligament, and ACL injuries with high sensitivity and moderate specificity in female, but not male, athletes.
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Core Stability Training for Injury Prevention

            Context: Enhancing core stability through exercise is common to musculoskeletal injury prevention programs. Definitive evidence demonstrating an association between core instability and injury is lacking; however, multifaceted prevention programs including core stabilization exercises appear to be effective at reducing lower extremity injury rates. Evidence Acquisition: PubMed was searched for epidemiologic, biomechanic, and clinical studies of core stability for injury prevention (keywords: “core OR trunk” AND “training OR prevention OR exercise OR rehabilitation” AND “risk OR prevalence”) published between January 1980 and October 2012. Articles with relevance to core stability risk factors, assessment, and training were reviewed. Relevant sources from articles were also retrieved and reviewed. Results: Stabilizer, mobilizer, and load transfer core muscles assist in understanding injury risk, assessing core muscle function, and developing injury prevention programs. Moderate evidence of alterations in core muscle recruitment and injury risk exists. Assessment tools to identify deficits in volitional muscle contraction, isometric muscle endurance, stabilization, and movement patterns are available. Exercise programs to improve core stability should focus on muscle activation, neuromuscular control, static stabilization, and dynamic stability. Conclusion: Core stabilization relies on instantaneous integration among passive, active, and neural control subsystems. Core muscles are often categorized functionally on the basis of stabilizing or mobilizing roles. Neuromuscular control is critical in coordinating this complex system for dynamic stabilization. Comprehensive assessment and training require a multifaceted approach to address core muscle strength, endurance, and recruitment requirements for functional demands associated with daily activities, exercise, and sport.
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Core strength training for patients with chronic low back pain

              [Purpose] Through core strength training, patients with chronic low back pain can strengthen their deep trunk muscles. However, independent training remains challenging, despite the existence of numerous core strength training strategies. Currently, no standardized system has been established analyzing and comparing the results of core strength training and typical resistance training. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review of the results of previous studies to explore the effectiveness of various core strength training strategies for patients with chronic low back pain. [Methods] We searched for relevant studies using electronic databases. Subsequently, we evaluated their quality by analyzing the reported data. [Results] We compared four methods of evaluating core strength training: trunk balance, stabilization, segmental stabilization, and motor control exercises. According to the results of various scales and evaluation instruments, core strength training is more effective than typical resistance training for alleviating chronic low back pain. [Conclusion] All of the core strength training strategies examined in this study assist in the alleviation of chronic low back pain; however, we recommend focusing on training the deep trunk muscles to alleviate chronic low back pain.

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Journal of Athletic Training
                Journal of Athletic Training
                Journal of Athletic Training/NATA
                1062-6050
                January 2017
                January 2017
                : 52
                : 1
                : 71-72
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Kinesiology Department, Texas Lutheran University, Seguin
                [2 ]Neuromechanics, Interventions, and Continuing Education Research (NICER) Laboratory, Department of Applied Medicine and Rehabilitation, Indiana State University, Terre Haute
                Article
                10.4085/1062-6050-51.11.16
                5293521
                27849389
                8accdb54-4e9a-4e52-a496-3528c49a8d53
                © 2017
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                Related Documents Log