Peer review: a flawed process at the heart of science and journals.

Smith, Richard

doi:10.1258/jrsm.99.4.178

Record: found
Abstract: not found
Article: not found

Peer review: a flawed process at the heart of science and journals.

Author(s): Richard Smith ¹

Publication date (Electronic): Apr 2006

Journal: Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine

Publisher: SAGE Publications

Read this article at

ScienceOpenPublisher PMC

Bookmark

There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

Related collections

Author and article information

Journal

Journal ID (iso-abbrev): J R Soc Med

Title: Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine

Publisher: SAGE Publications

ISSN: 0141-0768

ISSN (Print): 0141-0768

Publication date (Electronic): Apr 2006

Volume: 99

Issue: 4

Affiliations

[1 ] UnitedHealth Europe. richardswsmith@yahoo.co.uk

Article

Publisher Item ID: 99/4/178

DOI: 10.1258/jrsm.99.4.178

PMC ID: 1420798

PubMed ID: 16574968

SO-VID: 8adc4cc0-d13a-4099-b04d-9e6cfe0ca534

Data availability:

Comments

Comment on this article

Cited by 161

See all cited by

- Version 1
- Version 1

Peer review: a flawed process at the heart of science and journals.

Read this article at

Related collections

Peer reviewer: gatekeeper or outdated?

Author and article information

Journal

Affiliations

Article

Comments

Comment on this article

Similar content 2,928

Cited by 161