18
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      How do foodservice dietitians and dietetic students learn about environmental sustainability? A scoping review protocol

      protocol

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction

          Healthcare services are responsible for 7% of Australia’s carbon emissions, or 35 772 kt per annum, with 44% of these attributed to hospitals and an unknown proportion originating from the kitchen. Carbon emissions contribute to climate change that is predicted to adversely impact health outcomes. Healthcare professionals and institutions have an opportunity to reduce their impact on the climate. Australian dietitians, however, are not required to learn about environmental sustainability during their tertiary education. This scoping review will identify pedagogical frameworks employed by educational institutions and providers of professional development, to describe how foodservice dietitians and dietetic students develop environmental sustainability capabilities.

          Methods and analysis

          The scoping review methodology established by Arksey and O’Malley will be used for this review. Papers will be included if they focus on dietitians or dietetic students learning about environmental sustainability in the foodservice domain. Nine databases, Business Source Complete, CINAHL, Cochrane, Edge (via informit), EMBASE, MEDLINE, Proquest, Scopus and Web of Science, will be searched from their inception. Grey literature will also be identified by searching theses databases, professional bodies databases and Google Scholar. Eligible articles will be identified by screening papers by their title and abstract, followed by a full-text review. The study selection process will be completed independently by the primary investigator and the research team. Any discrepancies will be resolved through discussion. The extracted data including citation information, information on the intervention and outcomes will be summarised using descriptive statistics. Themes describing the pedagogical underpinnings of the interventions, the measurement tools and the impact of the learning activities will be synthesised narratively.

          Ethics and dissemination

          The results will inform the development of evidence-based pedagogical frameworks to enhance the capabilities of foodservice dietitians and dietetic students in environmental sustainability. Dissemination will occur through conference presentations, peer-reviewed journals and distribution through national accrediting bodies.

          Related collections

          Most cited references10

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews.

          Reviews of primary research are becoming more common as evidence-based practice gains recognition as the benchmark for care, and the number of, and access to, primary research sources has grown. One of the newer review types is the 'scoping review'. In general, scoping reviews are commonly used for 'reconnaissance' - to clarify working definitions and conceptual boundaries of a topic or field. Scoping reviews are therefore particularly useful when a body of literature has not yet been comprehensively reviewed, or exhibits a complex or heterogeneous nature not amenable to a more precise systematic review of the evidence. While scoping reviews may be conducted to determine the value and probable scope of a full systematic review, they may also be undertaken as exercises in and of themselves to summarize and disseminate research findings, to identify research gaps, and to make recommendations for the future research. This article briefly introduces the reader to scoping reviews, how they are different to systematic reviews, and why they might be conducted. The methodology and guidance for the conduct of systematic scoping reviews outlined below was developed by members of the Joanna Briggs Institute and members of five Joanna Briggs Collaborating Centres.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            The carbon footprint of Australian health care

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Adaptation of Kirkpatrick’s four level model of training criteria to assessment of learning outcomes and program evaluation in Higher Education

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                BMJ Open
                BMJ Open
                bmjopen
                bmjopen
                BMJ Open
                BMJ Publishing Group (BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR )
                2044-6055
                2019
                24 November 2019
                : 9
                : 11
                : e032355
                Affiliations
                [1 ] departmentSchool of Allied Health Sciences , Griffith University , Southport, Queensland, Australia
                [2 ] departmentAllied Health , Gold Coast Hospital and Health Service , Southport, Queensland, Australia
                [3 ] Griffith University School of Medicine , Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
                [4 ] departmentDepartment of Nutrition and Dietetics , Queensland University of Technology , Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
                [5 ] departmentDepartment of Nutrition and Dietetics , Royal Brisbane and Woman's Hospital Health Service District , Herston, Queensland, Australia
                [6 ] departmentGriffith Health , Griffith University - Gold Coast Campus , Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
                Author notes
                [Correspondence to ] Joanna McCormack; j.mccormack@ 123456griffith.edu.au
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8763-234X
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5946-5679
                Article
                bmjopen-2019-032355
                10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032355
                6886930
                31767594
                8afc5945-64f0-4f88-83c4-6009cd75aec5
                © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

                This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

                History
                : 14 June 2019
                : 24 October 2019
                : 28 October 2019
                Categories
                Medical Education and Training
                Protocol
                1506
                1709
                Custom metadata
                unlocked

                Medicine
                education & training (see medical education & training),nutrition & dietetics,health services administration & management

                Comments

                Comment on this article