205
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Increasing CO2 threatens human nutrition.

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Dietary deficiencies of zinc and iron are a substantial global public health problem. An estimated two billion people suffer these deficiencies, causing a loss of 63 million life-years annually. Most of these people depend on C3 grains and legumes as their primary dietary source of zinc and iron. Here we report that C3 grains and legumes have lower concentrations of zinc and iron when grown under field conditions at the elevated atmospheric CO2 concentration predicted for the middle of this century. C3 crops other than legumes also have lower concentrations of protein, whereas C4 crops seem to be less affected. Differences between cultivars of a single crop suggest that breeding for decreased sensitivity to atmospheric CO2 concentration could partly address these new challenges to global health.

          Related collections

          Most cited references26

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          On Judging the Significance of Differences by Examining the Overlap Between Confidence Intervals

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Sensitive method for the rapid determination of phytate in cereals and cereal products

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Rising atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration and the future of C4 crops for food and fuel.

              Crops with the C(4) photosynthetic pathway are vital to global food supply, particularly in the tropical regions where human well-being and agricultural productivity are most closely linked. While rising atmospheric [CO(2)] is the driving force behind the greater temperatures and water stress, which threaten to reduce future crop yields, it also has the potential to directly benefit crop physiology. The nature of C(4) plant responses to elevated [CO(2)] has been controversial. Recent evidence from free-air CO(2) enrichment (FACE) experiments suggests that elevated [CO(2)] does not directly stimulate C(4) photosynthesis. Nonetheless, drought stress can be ameliorated at elevated [CO(2)] as a result of lower stomatal conductance and greater intercellular [CO(2)]. Therefore, unlike C(3) crops for which there is a direct enhancement of photosynthesis by elevated [CO(2)], C(4) crops will only benefit from elevated [CO(2)] in times and places of drought stress. Current projections of future crop yields have assumed that rising [CO(2)] will directly enhance photosynthesis in all situations and, therefore, are likely to be overly optimistic. Additional experiments are needed to evaluate the extent to which amelioration of drought stress by elevated [CO(2)] will improve C(4) crop yields for food and fuel over the range of C(4) crop growing conditions and genotypes.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Nature
                Nature
                Springer Nature
                1476-4687
                0028-0836
                Jun 05 2014
                : 510
                : 7503
                Affiliations
                [1 ] 1] Department of Environmental Health, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, 02215, USA [2] Harvard University Center for the Environment, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA.
                [2 ] Department of Environmental Health, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, 02215, USA.
                [3 ] The Department of Geography and Environmental Development, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, PO Box 653, Beer Sheva, Israel.
                [4 ] Department of Earth and Planetary Science, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA.
                [5 ] Department of Plant Biology and Institute for Genomic Biology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois 61801, USA.
                [6 ] Department of Plant Sciences, University of California at Davis, Davis, California 95616, USA.
                [7 ] University of Pennsylvania, Department of Biology, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA.
                [8 ] Department of Environment and Primary Industries, Horsham, Victoria 3001, Australia.
                [9 ] National Institute for Agro-Environmental Sciences, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8604, Japan.
                [10 ] Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA.
                [11 ] United States Department of Agriculture Agricultural Research Service, Soybean/Maize Germplasm, Pathology, and Genetics Research Unit, Department of Crop Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois 61801, USA.
                [12 ] School of Plant Sciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721, USA.
                [13 ] United States Department of Agriculture Agricultural Research Service, Aberdeen, Idaho 83210, USA.
                [14 ] The Nature Conservancy, Santa Fe, New Mexico 87544, USA.
                [15 ] Department of Agriculture and Food Systems, Melbourne School of Land and Environment, The University of Melbourne, Creswick, Victoria 3363, Australia.
                [16 ] Department of Forest and Ecosystem Science, Melbourne School of Land and Environment, The University of Melbourne, Creswick, Victoria 3363, Australia.
                Article
                nature13179 NIHMS765241
                10.1038/nature13179
                4810679
                24805231
                8afdf674-5789-4374-94f0-759c72e4504c
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article