37
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Classical test theory versus Rasch analysis for quality of life questionnaire reduction

      , 1 , 2 , 2

      Health and Quality of Life Outcomes

      BioMed Central

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Although health-related quality of life (HRQOL) instruments may offer satisfactory results, their length often limits the extent to which they are actually applied in clinical practice. Efforts to develop short questionnaires have largely focused on reducing existing instruments. The approaches most frequently employed for this purpose rely on statistical procedures that are considered exponents of Classical Test Theory (CTT). Despite the popularity of CTT, two major conceptual limitations have been pointed out: the lack of an explicit ordered continuum of items that represent a unidimensional construct, and the lack of additivity of rating scale data. In contrast to the CTT approach, the Rasch model provides an alternative scaling methodology that enables the examination of the hierarchical structure, unidimensionality and additivity of HRQOL measures. METHODS: In order to empirically compare CTT and Rasch Analysis (RA) results, this paper presents the parallel reduction of a 38-item questionnaire, the Nottingham Health Profile (NHP), through the analysis of the responses of a sample of 9,419 individuals.

          Results

          CTT resulted in 20 items (4 dimensions) whereas RA in 22 items (2 dimensions). Both instruments showed similar characteristics under CTT requirements: item-total correlation ranged 0.45–0.75 for NHP20 and 0.46–0.68 for NHP22, while reliability ranged 0.82–0.93 and 0.87–94 respectively.

          Conclusions

          Despite the differences in content, NHP20 and NHP22 convergent scores also showed high degrees of association (0.78–0.95). Although the unidimensional view of health of the NHP20 and NHP22 composite scores was also confirmed by RA, NHP20 dimensions failed to meet the goodness-of fit criteria established by the Rasch model, precluding the interval-level of measurement of its scores.

          Related collections

          Most cited references 43

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests

           Lee Cronbach (1951)
          Psychometrika, 16(3), 297-334
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Factor analysis

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Probabalistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests

               G Rasch (1993)
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Health Qual Life Outcomes
                Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
                BioMed Central (London )
                1477-7525
                2003
                28 July 2003
                : 1
                : 27
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Health Outcomes Research Unit. Eli Lilly and Company, Madrid, Spain
                [2 ]Health Services Research Unit. Institut Municipal d'Investigació Mèdica (IMIM). C/ Dr. Aiguader, 80; 08003 Barcelona, Spain
                Article
                1477-7525-1-27
                10.1186/1477-7525-1-27
                194220
                12952544
                Copyright © 2003 Prieto et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article: verbatim copying and redistribution of this article are permitted in all media for any purpose, provided this notice is preserved along with the article's original URL.
                Categories
                Research

                Health & Social care

                Comments

                Comment on this article