17
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Evidence of association between the use of drugs and community-dwelling older people frailty: a cross-sectional study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          ABSTRACT

          BACKGROUND:

          The scientific literature has shown that an association between polypharmacy and frailty exists. However, few studies have also considered drug interactions and the use of potentially inappropriate medications.

          OBJECTIVE:

          To evaluate the association between the use of drugs and frailty among community-dwelling older people.

          DESIGN AND SETTING:

          Cross-sectional study carried out among 580 older people in Uberaba (MG).

          METHODS:

          Data were collected at these older people's homes using instruments validated in Brazil. Descriptive, bivariate and binary logistic regression analyses were performed (P < 0.05).

          RESULTS:

          Most of these individuals were classified as pre-frail (55.7%), while 13.1% were frail. It was found that 31.7% of them presented polypharmacy, 41.7% had drug interactions and 43.8% were using potentially inappropriate medications. In the initial model, polypharmacy (odds ratio, OR = 1.91; confidence interval, CI = 1.27-2.86) and use of potentially inappropriate medications (OR = 2.45; CI = 1.68-3.57) increased the chance that these older people would be pre-frail or frail. In the final adjusted model, use of potentially inappropriate drugs remained associated with the outcome (OR = 2.26; CI = 1.43-3.57).

          CONCLUSION:

          Use of potentially inappropriate medications was the independent variable that explained the occurrence of frailty in a representative sample of community-dwelling older adults.

          Related collections

          Most cited references78

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Frailty in Older Adults: Evidence for a Phenotype

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Frailty consensus: a call to action.

            Frailty is a clinical state in which there is an increase in an individual's vulnerability for developing increased dependency and/or mortality when exposed to a stressor. Frailty can occur as the result of a range of diseases and medical conditions. A consensus group consisting of delegates from 6 major international, European, and US societies created 4 major consensus points on a specific form of frailty: physical frailty. 1. Physical frailty is an important medical syndrome. The group defined physical frailty as "a medical syndrome with multiple causes and contributors that is characterized by diminished strength, endurance, and reduced physiologic function that increases an individual's vulnerability for developing increased dependency and/or death." 2. Physical frailty can potentially be prevented or treated with specific modalities, such as exercise, protein-calorie supplementation, vitamin D, and reduction of polypharmacy. 3. Simple, rapid screening tests have been developed and validated, such as the simple FRAIL scale, to allow physicians to objectively recognize frail persons. 4. For the purposes of optimally managing individuals with physical frailty, all persons older than 70 years and all individuals with significant weight loss (>5%) due to chronic disease should be screened for frailty. Copyright © 2013 American Medical Directors Association, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Prevalence of frailty in community-dwelling older persons: a systematic review.

              To systematically compare and pool the prevalence of frailty, including prefrailty, reported in community-dwelling older people overall and according to sex, age, and definition of frailty used. Systematic review of the literature using the key words elderly, aged, frailty, prevalence, and epidemiology. Cross-sectional data from community-based cohorts. Community-dwelling adults aged 65 and older. In the studies that were found, frailty and prefrailty were measured according to physical phenotype and broad phenotype, the first defining frailty as a purely physical condition and the second also including psychosocial aspects. Reported prevalence in the community varies enormously (range 4.0-59.1%). The overall weighted prevalence of frailty was 10.7% (95% confidence interval (CI) = 10.5-10.9; 21 studies; 61,500 participants). The weighted prevalence was 9.9% for physical frailty (95% CI = 9.6-10.2; 15 studies; 44,894 participants) and 13.6% for the broad phenotype of frailty (95% CI = 13.2-14.0; 8 studies; 24,072 participants) (chi-square (χ(2) ) = 217.7, degrees of freedom (df)=1, P < .001). Prevalence increased with age (χ(2) = 6067, df = 1, P < .001) and was higher in women (9.6%, 95% CI = 9.2-10.0%) than in men (5.2%, 95% CI = 4.9-5.5%; χ(2) = 298.9 df = 1, P < .001). Frailty is common in later life, but different operationalization of frailty status results in widely differing prevalence between studies. Improving the comparability of epidemiological and clinical studies constitutes an important step forward. © 2012, Copyright the Authors Journal compilation © 2012, The American Geriatrics Society.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: conceptualization (equal), methodology (equal), writing-original draft (equal) and writing-review and editing (equal);
                Role: data curation (equal), methodology (equal), writing-original draft (equal) and writing-review and editing (equal);
                Role: data curation (equal), methodology (equal), writing-original draft (equal) and writing-review and editing (equal);
                Role: funding acquisition (equal), methodology (equal), writing-original draft (equal) and writing-review and editing (equal);
                Role: methodology (equal), writing-original draft (equal) and writing-review and editing (equal);
                Role: conceptualization, formal analysis (equal), methodology, project administration (equal), writing-original draft (equal) and writing-review and editing (equal).
                Journal
                Sao Paulo Med J
                Sao Paulo Med J
                Sao Paulo Med J
                São Paulo Medical Journal
                Associação Paulista de Medicina - APM
                1516-3180
                1806-9460
                09 October 2020
                2020
                : 138
                : 6
                : 465-474
                Affiliations
                [I ] originalBSc. Pharmacist, Universidade de Brasília – Campus Darcy Ribeiro (UnB), Brasília (DF) Brazil.
                [II ] originalPhD. Nurse, Universidade Federal do Triângulo Mineiro (UFTM), Uberaba (MG), Brazil.
                [III ] originalPhD. Physiotherapist and Adjunct Professor, Physiotherapy Course, Universidade Federal do Amapá (UNIFAP), Macapá (AP), Brazil.
                [IV ] originalPhD. Nurse and Associate Professor, Department of Nursing Education and Community Health Nursing Undergraduate Program, Universidade Federal do Triângulo Mineiro (UFTM), Uberaba (MG), Brazil.
                [V ] originalPhD. Nurse and Pharmacist, Associate Professor, Universidade de Brasília – Campus Darcy Ribeiro (UnB). Brasília (DF), Brazil.
                [VI ] originalPhD. Nurse and Adjunct Professor, Universidade de Brasília – Campus Darcy Ribeiro (UnB), Brasília (DF), Brazil.
                Author notes
                Address for correspondence: Alisson Fernandes Bolina, Universidade de Brasília Asa Norte, s/no Campus Darcy Ribeiro — Brasília (DF) — Brasil CEP 70910-900 Tel. (+55 61) 3107-1702 E-mail: alissonbolina@ 123456yahoo.com.br

                Authors’ contributions: All authors actively contributed to the discussion of the results of the study, reviewed it and approved the final version to be released

                Conflict of interest: None

                Article
                10.1590/1516-3180.2020.0205.R1.06082020
                9685580
                33053050
                8b26e4c1-16fa-4b9a-8415-4b90552d54d5
                © 2022 by Associação Paulista de Medicina

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons license.

                History
                : 01 May 2020
                : 28 July 2020
                : 06 August 2020
                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 2, Equations: 0, References: 54, Pages: 10
                Categories
                Original Article

                polypharmacy,drug interactions,potentially inappropriate medication list,older people,frail older people,polypharmacy among older people

                Comments

                Comment on this article