6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Evaluación de la experiencia asistencial en pacientes con Enfermedad Renal Crónica Avanzada Translated title: Assessment of the care experience in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          RESUMEN Introducción: Los resultados clínicos están más condicionados al papel activo del paciente en su autocuidado que por la cualificación profesional, por ello es importante capturar la experiencia del paciente para mejorar la calidad asistencial. Objetivos: Evaluar la experiencia del paciente renal en la atención recibida por los profesionales. Material y Método: Estudio descriptivo transversal en pacientes de Hemodiálisis y consulta de Enfermedad Renal Crónica Avanzada. Se administró el Instrumento de Evaluación de la eXperiencia del PAciente Crónico, 15 ítems que puntuaron de 0 (peor) a 10 (mejor experiencia) y que, midió 3 factores: interacciones productivas, autogestión del paciente y nuevo modelo relacional. Los datos se analizaron con el software R. Resultados: Se incluyeron 76 pacientes. La puntuación de la experiencia del paciente (ítems 1-11) fue de 6,68±1,41 puntos, siendo para cada factor: “interacciones productivas” (9,00±1,37 puntos), “autogestión del paciente” (7,80±1,78 puntos) y “nuevo modelo relacional” (1,86±2,01 puntos). Los ítems 12-15 obtuvieron bajas puntuaciones con valores medios entre 2-4 puntos. Al comparar los pacientes de consulta y hemodiálisis, el grupo hemodiálisis puntuó menos en los factores: “autogestión del paciente” (p=0,01) y “nuevo modelo relacional” (p=0,03); y con respecto a los ítems 12-15, también se obtuvo menor puntuación en el ítem “atención continuada tras un ingreso/urgencia (p=0,04). Conclusiones: La experiencia del paciente renal es positiva en la interacción con los profesionales y en la gestión del autocuidado, pero surgen áreas de mejora como el uso de tecnología digital, compartir experiencias con iguales y, el seguimiento de la salud tras un episodio agudo.

          Translated abstract

          ABSTRACT Introduction: Clinical outcomes are more influenced by the active role of the patient in self-care than by professional qualifications. Therefore, it is important to capture the patient’s experience to enhance the quality of care. Objetives: To evaluate the renal patient’s experience with the care provided by healthcare professionals. Material and Method: A cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted with hemodialysis patients and those attending the Advanced Chronic Kidney Disease consultation. The Patient Experience Assessment Instrument, comprising 15 items rated from 0 (worst) to 10 (best experience), measuring three factors: productive interactions, patient self-management, and a new relational model, was administered. Data were analyzed using R software. Results: A total of 76 patients were included. The patient experience score (items 1-11) was 6.68±1.41 points, with scores for each factor being: “productive interactions” (9.00±1.37 points), “patient self-management” (7.80±1.78 points), and “new relational model” (1.86±2.01 points). Items 12-15 received low scores with average values between 2-4 points. When comparing clinic and hemodialysis patients, the hemodialysis group scored lower in the “patient self-management” (p=0.01) and “new relational model” (p=0.03) factors. Additionally, regarding items 12-15, a lower score was obtained in the “continuing care following admission/emergency” item (p=0.04). Conclusions: The renal patient’s experience is positive in interactions with healthcare professionals and in self-care management. However, there are areas for improvement, such as the use of digital technology, sharing experiences with peers, and post-acute episode health monitoring.

          Related collections

          Most cited references28

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          A systematic review of evidence on the links between patient experience and clinical safety and effectiveness

          Objective To explore evidence on the links between patient experience and clinical safety and effectiveness outcomes. Design Systematic review. Setting A wide range of settings within primary and secondary care including hospitals and primary care centres. Participants A wide range of demographic groups and age groups. Primary and secondary outcome measures A broad range of patient safety and clinical effectiveness outcomes including mortality, physical symptoms, length of stay and adherence to treatment. Results This study, summarising evidence from 55 studies, indicates consistent positive associations between patient experience, patient safety and clinical effectiveness for a wide range of disease areas, settings, outcome measures and study designs. It demonstrates positive associations between patient experience and self-rated and objectively measured health outcomes; adherence to recommended clinical practice and medication; preventive care (such as health-promoting behaviour, use of screening services and immunisation); and resource use (such as hospitalisation, length of stay and primary-care visits). There is some evidence of positive associations between patient experience and measures of the technical quality of care and adverse events. Overall, it was more common to find positive associations between patient experience and patient safety and clinical effectiveness than no associations. Conclusions The data presented display that patient experience is positively associated with clinical effectiveness and patient safety, and support the case for the inclusion of patient experience as one of the central pillars of quality in healthcare. It supports the argument that the three dimensions of quality should be looked at as a group and not in isolation. Clinicians should resist sidelining patient experience as too subjective or mood-oriented, divorced from the ‘real’ clinical work of measuring safety and effectiveness.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            The patient experience and health outcomes.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Hearing the patient's voice? Factors affecting the use of patient survey data in quality improvement.

              To develop a framework for understanding factors affecting the use of patient survey data in quality improvement. Qualitative interviews with senior health professionals and managers and a review of the literature. A quality improvement collaborative in Minnesota, USA involving teams from eight medical groups, focusing on how to use patient survey data to improve patient centred care. Eight team leaders (medical, clinical improvement or service quality directors) and six team members (clinical improvement coordinators and managers). Respondents reported three types of barriers before the collaborative: organisational, professional and data related. Organisational barriers included lack of supporting values for patient centred care, competing priorities, and lack of an effective quality improvement infrastructure. Professional barriers included clinicians and staff not being used to focusing on patient interaction as a quality issue, individuals not necessarily having been selected, trained or supported to provide patient centred care, and scepticism, defensiveness or resistance to change following feedback. Data related barriers included lack of expertise with survey data, lack of timely and specific results, uncertainty over the effective interventions or time frames for improvement, and consequent risk of perceived low cost effectiveness of data collection. Factors that appeared to have promoted data use included board led strategies to change culture and create quality improvement forums, leadership from senior physicians and managers, and the persistence of quality improvement staff over several years in demonstrating change in other areas. Using patient survey data may require a more concerted effort than for other clinical data. Organisations may need to develop cultures that support patient centred care, quality improvement capacity, and to align professional receptiveness and leadership with technical expertise with the data.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                enefro
                Enfermería Nefrológica
                Enferm Nefrol
                Sociedad Española de Enfermería Nefrológica (Madrid, Madrid, Spain )
                2254-2884
                2255-3517
                September 2023
                : 26
                : 3
                : 260-267
                Affiliations
                [2] orgnameInstituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Principado de Asturias orgdiv1Grupo de Investigación en Cuidados de Nefrología orgdiv2Servicio de Salud del Principado de Asturias España
                [3] Gijón orgnameHospital Cabueñes orgdiv1Consulta de Enfermedad Renal Crónica Avanzada Spain
                [1] Gijón Asturias orgnameHospital Universitario de Cabueñes orgdiv1Unidad de Hemodiálisis España
                Article
                S2254-28842023000300007 S2254-2884(23)02600300007
                10.37551/s254-28842023025
                8b622db5-4ee7-45e9-8ec2-241128f509f6

                This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

                History
                : 06 April 2023
                : 25 May 2023
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 0, Equations: 0, References: 29, Pages: 8
                Product

                SciELO Spain

                Categories
                Originales

                patient experience,enfermedad crónica,IEXPAC,diálisis renal,atención dirigida al paciente,experiencia del paciente,chronic disease,renal dialysis,patient-centered care

                Comments

                Comment on this article