34
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      New developments in bone-conduction hearing implants: a review

      review-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The different kinds of bone-conduction devices (BCDs) available for hearing rehabilitation are growing. In this paper, all BCDs currently available or in clinical trials will be described in categories according to their principles. BCDs that vibrate the bone via the skin are referred to as skin-drive devices, and are divided into conventional devices, which are attached with softbands, for example, and passive transcutaneous devices, which have implanted magnets. BCDs that directly stimulate the bone are referred to as direct-drive devices, and are further divided into percutaneous and active transcutaneous devices; the latter have implanted transducers directly stimulating the bone under intact skin. The percutaneous direct-drive device is known as a bone-anchored hearing aid, which is the BCD that has the largest part of the market today. Because of some issues associated with the percutaneous implant, and to some extent because of esthetics, more transcutaneous solutions with intact skin are being developed today, both in the skin-drive and in the direct-drive category. Challenges in developing transcutaneous BCDs are mostly to do with power, attachment, invasiveness, and magnetic resonance imaging compatibility. In the future, the authors assume that the existing percutaneous direct-drive BCD will be retained as an important rehabilitation alternative, while the transcutaneous solutions will increase their part of the market, especially for patients with bone-conduction thresholds better than 35 dB HL (hearing level). Furthermore, the active transcutaneous direct-drive BCDs appear to be the most promising systems, but to establish more detailed inclusion criteria, and potential benefits and drawbacks, more extensive clinical studies are needed.

          Related collections

          Most cited references72

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Experience from a 10-year period.

            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Assessment of more than 1,000 implanted percutaneous bone conduction devices: skin reactions and implant survival.

            This study assesses soft tissue reactions and implant stability of 1,132 percutaneous titanium implants (970 patients) for bone conduction devices (BCDs). In addition, it examines BCD usage and comparisons between different patient groups.
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Outcome of the bone-anchored hearing aid procedure without skin thinning: a prospective clinical trial.

              To evaluate the outcome of Bone-Anchored Hearing Aid surgery without skin thinning, a test group with direct implantation without such thinning was compared with a control group that underwent the traditional procedure.

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Med Devices (Auckl)
                Med Devices (Auckl)
                Medical Devices: Evidence and Research
                Medical Devices (Auckland, N.Z.)
                Dove Medical Press
                1179-1470
                2015
                16 January 2015
                : 8
                : 79-93
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Signals and Systems, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden
                [2 ]Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
                Author notes
                Correspondence: Sabine Reinfeldt, Department of Signals and Systems, Chalmers University of Technology, SE-412 96 Gothenburg, Sweden, Tel +46 31 772 8063, Fax +46 31 772 1782, Email sabine.reinfeldt@ 123456chalmers.se
                Article
                mder-8-079
                10.2147/MDER.S39691
                4303401
                25653565
                8b7560f8-c302-48eb-983d-c7154535c88e
                © 2015 Reinfeldt et al. This work is published by Dove Medical Press Limited, and licensed under Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License

                The full terms of the License are available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.

                History
                Categories
                Review

                Biotechnology
                bone-conduction device,implantable,transcutaneous,percutaneous,active,passive
                Biotechnology
                bone-conduction device, implantable, transcutaneous, percutaneous, active, passive

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                Related Documents Log