21
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Patient advocates' views of patient roles in interprofessional collaborative practice in primary care: A constructivist grounded theory study

      research-article
      , APD, MNDP, BBmedSc 1 , , , BM, BCh, MA, PhD, MRCGP, FRACGP 1 , , AdvAPD, PhD 2 , 3 , , APD, RD, PhD 1
      Health & Social Care in the Community
      John Wiley and Sons Inc.
      chronic disease, intersectoral collaboration, patient care team, primary healthcare, qualitative research

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Interprofessional collaborative practice has been shown to be an appropriate model of care for chronic disease management in primary care. However, how patients play a role in this model is relatively unknown. The aim of this constructivist grounded theory focus group study was to explore the perceptions of patient advocates regarding the role of patients in interprofessional collaborative practice for chronic conditions in primary care. Primary data were collected from patient advocates, from public and private Australian organisations and who represent patients with chronic disease in primary care, through focus groups in July–August 2020. Videoconference focus groups were recorded, transcribed verbatim and inductively, thematically analysed using the five‐step approach by Charmaz: (1) initial line‐by‐line coding, (2) focused coding, (3) memo writing, (4) categorisation and (5) theme and sub‐theme development. Three focus groups comprising 17 patient advocates with diverse cultural and professional backgrounds participated. Two themes and five sub‐themes relating to interprofessional collaborative practice teams were constructed from the data. In theme 1, patients ‘shifted across the spectrum of roles’ from ‘relinquishing control to the team’, ‘joining the team’ to ‘disengaging from the team’. The second theme was the need for ‘juggling roles’ by ‘integrating patient role with life roles’, and ‘learning about the patient role’. The diversity and variability of patient roles as described by patient advocates highlight the challenges of working with people with chronic conditions. The diverse patient roles described by advocates are an important finding that may better inform communication between patients and health professionals when managing chronic conditions. From the health professional perspective, identification of the role of a patient may be challenging. Therefore, future research should explore the development of a tool to assist both patients and health professionals to identify patient roles as they move across the spectrum, with the support of policy makers. This tool should aim to identify and promote patient engagement in interprofessional collaborative practice in primary care settings.

          Related collections

          Most cited references47

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Standards for reporting qualitative research: a synthesis of recommendations.

          Standards for reporting exist for many types of quantitative research, but currently none exist for the broad spectrum of qualitative research. The purpose of the present study was to formulate and define standards for reporting qualitative research while preserving the requisite flexibility to accommodate various paradigms, approaches, and methods.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            From triple to quadruple aim: care of the patient requires care of the provider.

            The Triple Aim-enhancing patient experience, improving population health, and reducing costs-is widely accepted as a compass to optimize health system performance. Yet physicians and other members of the health care workforce report widespread burnout and dissatisfaction. Burnout is associated with lower patient satisfaction, reduced health outcomes, and it may increase costs. Burnout thus imperils the Triple Aim. This article recommends that the Triple Aim be expanded to a Quadruple Aim, adding the goal of improving the work life of health care providers, including clinicians and staff.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              A systematic review of evidence on the links between patient experience and clinical safety and effectiveness

              Objective To explore evidence on the links between patient experience and clinical safety and effectiveness outcomes. Design Systematic review. Setting A wide range of settings within primary and secondary care including hospitals and primary care centres. Participants A wide range of demographic groups and age groups. Primary and secondary outcome measures A broad range of patient safety and clinical effectiveness outcomes including mortality, physical symptoms, length of stay and adherence to treatment. Results This study, summarising evidence from 55 studies, indicates consistent positive associations between patient experience, patient safety and clinical effectiveness for a wide range of disease areas, settings, outcome measures and study designs. It demonstrates positive associations between patient experience and self-rated and objectively measured health outcomes; adherence to recommended clinical practice and medication; preventive care (such as health-promoting behaviour, use of screening services and immunisation); and resource use (such as hospitalisation, length of stay and primary-care visits). There is some evidence of positive associations between patient experience and measures of the technical quality of care and adverse events. Overall, it was more common to find positive associations between patient experience and patient safety and clinical effectiveness than no associations. Conclusions The data presented display that patient experience is positively associated with clinical effectiveness and patient safety, and support the case for the inclusion of patient experience as one of the central pillars of quality in healthcare. It supports the argument that the three dimensions of quality should be looked at as a group and not in isolation. Clinicians should resist sidelining patient experience as too subjective or mood-oriented, divorced from the ‘real’ clinical work of measuring safety and effectiveness.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                alexandra.davidson@student.bond.edu.au
                Journal
                Health Soc Care Community
                Health Soc Care Community
                10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2524
                HSC
                Health & Social Care in the Community
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                0966-0410
                1365-2524
                22 September 2022
                November 2022
                : 30
                : 6 ( doiID: 10.1111/hsc.v30.6 )
                : e5775-e5785
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine Bond University Gold Coast Queensland Australia
                [ 2 ] Menzies Health Institute Queensland Griffith University Gold Coast Queensland Australia
                [ 3 ] The University of Queensland Brisbane Queensland Australia
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence

                Alexandra R. Davidson, Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, Bond University, 14 University Drive, Robina, Gold Coast, Qld., Australia.

                Email: alexandra.davidson@ 123456student.bond.edu.au

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0445-3299
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7749-2427
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5394-0931
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9993-8239
                Article
                HSC14009 HSCC-OA-22-0423.R1
                10.1111/hsc.14009
                10087047
                36134601
                8bb969e2-c426-43fd-b5cc-e6e919c0925f
                © 2022 The Authors. Health and Social Care in the Community published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.

                History
                : 22 June 2022
                : 21 March 2022
                : 20 August 2022
                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 1, Pages: 11, Words: 7789
                Funding
                Funded by: Australian Government Research Training Program Scholarship , doi 10.13039/501100001789;
                Categories
                Original Article
                Original Articles
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                November 2022
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:6.2.7 mode:remove_FC converted:11.04.2023

                Health & Social care
                chronic disease,intersectoral collaboration,patient care team,primary healthcare,qualitative research

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_

                Similar content245

                Cited by5

                Most referenced authors3,621