12
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Robotic crabs reveal that female fiddler crabs are sensitive to changes in male display rate

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Males often produce dynamic, repetitive courtship displays that can be demanding to perform and might advertise male quality to females. A key feature of demanding displays is that they can change in intensity: escalating as a male increases his signalling effort, but de-escalating as a signaller becomes fatigued. Here, we investigated whether female fiddler crabs, Uca mjoebergi, are sensitive to changes in male courtship wave rate. We performed playback experiments using robotic male crabs that had the same mean wave rate, but either escalated, de-escalated or remained constant. Females demonstrated a strong preference for escalating robots, but showed mixed responses to robots that de-escalated (‘fast’ to ‘slow’) compared to those that waved at a constant ‘medium’ rate. These findings demonstrate that females can discern changes in male display rate, and prefer males that escalate, but that females are also sensitive to past display rates indicative of prior vigour.

          Related collections

          Most cited references14

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Why do animals repeat displays?

          Both agonistic and sexual animal displays often involve more than one performance of some specific display action. Since repetition is energetically costly there must be good reasons why a signaller should carry out such repetitive actions, rather than simply displaying once. We briefly review three different 'reasons' which arise from three different receiver assessment rules: when assessment is based on the average magnitude of all display actions so far, the reason for the repetition is to improve the accuracy of the estimate (model A); when the assessment is based solely on the action of greatest magnitude so far, the repetition is to replace the signal with one of greater magnitude (model B); when the assessment is based on the cumulative sum of all display actions so far, the repetition is to augment that sum (model C). We discuss how to characterize each case from an understanding of its expected optimal behaviour as predicted by formal models. For model A the mean magnitude of display actions should stay constant and the contest duration should depend on relative qualities. In models B and C the encounter duration depends only on the weaker participant. In model B each display action is greater than the previous, but only a small number of steps are expected. In model C the magnitude of display actions can either escalate, stay constant, or even decrease. The displays of cichlid fish, the roaring contests of red deer, Cervus elaphusthe calling of Blanchard's cricket frogs, Acris crepitans blanchardiand the pheromonal exchanges of yeast gametes are used as illustrative examples.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Repetitive signals and mate choice: insights from contest theory

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Visually mediated species and neighbour recognition in fiddler crabs (Uca mjoebergi and Uca capricornis)

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Biol Lett
                Biol. Lett
                RSBL
                roybiolett
                Biology Letters
                The Royal Society
                1744-9561
                1744-957X
                January 2018
                17 January 2018
                17 January 2018
                : 14
                : 1
                : 20170695
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Biology, Anglia Ruskin University , Cambridge CB1 1PT, UK
                [2 ]Ecology & Evolution, Research School of Biology, The Australian National University , Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia
                Author notes

                Electronic supplementary material is available online at http://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.3965814.

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2323-0509
                Article
                rsbl20170695
                10.1098/rsbl.2017.0695
                5803598
                29343563
                8bdf8c90-f7b9-4428-9b90-de1b428ce15c
                © 2018 The Authors.

                Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 9 November 2017
                : 18 December 2017
                Funding
                Funded by: Australian Research Council;
                Award ID: ARC Discovery Grant (DP120101427) to P.R.Y.B.
                Categories
                1001
                14
                60
                70
                Animal Behaviour
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                January, 2018

                Life sciences
                courtship,fiddler crab,mate choice,robotic playback,stamina,uca mjoebergi
                Life sciences
                courtship, fiddler crab, mate choice, robotic playback, stamina, uca mjoebergi

                Comments

                Comment on this article