5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Dying to help: Fatal bystander rescues in Australian coastal environments

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Bystanders who drown during a rescue attempt in aquatic waterways are becoming an increasingly important issue within drowning prevention. In the Australian context, the majority of these incidents occur in coastal water ways. This study documents and characterizes bystander rescuer fatalities within Australian coastal waterways that occurred between 1 July 2004 and 30 June 2019 in order to provide suggestions for future public safety interventions involving bystander rescuers. Data was sourced through Surf Life Saving Australia’s (SLSA) Coastal Fatality Database, which collates information from multiple sources. Sixty-seven bystander rescuer fatalities in coastal waterways were reported during the 15-year period, an average of 4.5 per year, which is a significant proportion of the five fatalities previously reported across all Australian waterways. The majority of coastal bystander rescuer fatality incidents occurred in the state of New South Wales (49%), at beaches (64%), in regional or remote areas (71%), more than 1 km from the nearest lifesaving service (78%), during summer (45%), in the afternoon (72%), in the presence of rip currents (73%), and did not involve the use of flotation devices to assist rescue (97%). The majority of coastal bystander rescuer victims were Australian residents (88%) born in Australia/Oceania (68%), males (81%), aged between 30–44 years old (36%), visitors to the location (55%), either family (69%) or friends (15%) of the rescuee(s), and were attempting to rescue someone younger than 18 years old (64%). Our results suggest future safety intervention approaches should target males, parents and carers visiting beach locations in regional locations during holiday times and should focus on the importance of flotation devices when enacting a rescue and further educating visitors about the rip current hazard. Future research should examine the psychology of bystander rescue situations and evaluate the effectiveness of different safety intervention approaches.

          Related collections

          Most cited references44

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          The Hidden Tragedy of Rivers: A Decade of Unintentional Fatal Drowning in Australia

          Objective(s) Describe unintentional drowning deaths in rivers, creeks and streams (rivers) in Australia and identify risk factors to inform prevention. Design & Setting This study is a cross-sectional, total population audit of all unintentional fatal drownings in Australian rivers between 1-July-2002 and 30-June-2012 using Australian coronial data. A modified Bonferroni test has been applied, deeming statistical significance p<0.03 and p<0.04 respectively. Results Rivers (n = 770; 26.6%) were the leading location among the 2,892 people who died from unintentional fatal drowning. This is a rate of 0.37/100,000 people / annum. Within river drowning deaths common groups include; males (80.4%), adults (85.3%), adults who have consumed alcohol (25.5%), people who fell in (21.3%), people involved in non-aquatic transport incidents (18.2%) and locals (74.0%). Children were 1.75 times more likely than adults (p<0.04) to drown in rivers as a result of a fall and adults 1.50 times more likely to drown in rivers as a result of watercraft incidents when compared to children. When compared to males, females were 2.27 and 4.45 times respectively more likely to drown in rivers as a result of incidents involving non-aquatic transport (p<0.04) and being swept away by floodwaters (p<0.04). Males were 2.66 and 4.27 times respectively more likely to drown in rivers as a result of watercraft incidents (p<0.04) and as a result of jumping in (p<0.04) when compared to females. Conclusion(s) While rivers are the leading location for drowning in Australia, little is understood about the risks. This study has identified key groups (males, adults, locals) and activities. While males were more likely to drown, the risk profile for females differed.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Rip current related drowning deaths and rescues in Australia 2004–2011

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found
              Is Open Access

              Rip current types, circulation and hazard

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Data curationRole: Formal analysisRole: InvestigationRole: MethodologyRole: Project administrationRole: VisualizationRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: InvestigationRole: Methodology
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: SupervisionRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: MethodologyRole: SupervisionRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: InvestigationRole: MethodologyRole: Project administrationRole: ResourcesRole: SoftwareRole: SupervisionRole: VisualizationRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                PLoS ONE
                plos
                plosone
                PLoS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, CA USA )
                1932-6203
                16 September 2020
                2020
                : 15
                : 9
                : e0238317
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Surf Life Saving Australia, Sydney, NSW, Australia
                [2 ] School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
                [3 ] College of Public Health, Medical and Veterinary Sciences, James Cook University, Townsville, Qld., Australia
                South China University of Technology, CHINA
                Author notes

                Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6652-3053
                Article
                PONE-D-20-10189
                10.1371/journal.pone.0238317
                7494089
                32936817
                8bfa67c2-295e-40a9-bd4a-0d085c4fd712
                © 2020 Lawes et al

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 9 April 2020
                : 13 August 2020
                Page count
                Figures: 5, Tables: 2, Pages: 18
                Funding
                The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Earth Sciences
                Geomorphology
                Topography
                Landforms
                Beaches
                People and Places
                Geographical Locations
                Oceania
                Australia
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Epidemiology
                Medical Risk Factors
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Physiology
                Biological Locomotion
                Swimming
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Toxicology
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Pathology and Laboratory Medicine
                Toxicology
                Social Sciences
                Sociology
                Human Families
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Public and Occupational Health
                Global Health
                Earth Sciences
                Geography
                Geographic Areas
                Remote Areas
                Custom metadata
                Raw data can be extrapolated from results tables included in the paper. Data cannot be shared publicly due to ethical constraints and because the data is accessed through a third party (National Coronial Information System) and the authors do not have permission to share the data. Data are available to researchers who meet the ethical criteria for access to confidential data and can demonstrate approval from the National Coronial Information System. Once approved, data requests can be made through SLSA (contact via email jlawes@ 123456slsa.asn.au ).

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article