7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      De novo lupus nephritis during treatment with belimumab

      brief-report

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective

          In light of reports of de novo LN during belimumab (BLM) treatment, we sought to determine its frequency and contributing or protective factors in a real-life setting.

          Methods

          Patients with SLE who received BLM between 2011 and 2017 at five European academic practices were enrolled ( n = 95) and followed longitudinally for a median time of 13.1 months [interquartile range (IQR): 6.0–34.7]; 52.6% were anti-dsDNA positive, 60.0% had low complement levels, and 69.5% had no renal involvement prior to/at BLM initiation [mean disease duration at baseline: 11.4 (9.3) years]. Age- and sex-matched patients with non-renal SLE who had similar serological profiles, but were not exposed to BLM, served as controls (median follow-up: 132.0 months; IQR: 98.3–151.2).

          Results

          We observed 6/66 cases (9.1%) of biopsy-proven de novo LN (4/6 proliferative) among the non-renal BLM-treated SLE cases after a follow-up of 7.4 months (IQR: 2.7–22.2). Among controls, 2/66 cases (3.0%) of de novo LN (both proliferative) were observed after 21 and 50 months. BLM treatment was associated with an increased frequency and/or shorter time to de novo LN [hazard ratio (HR): 10.7; 95% CI: 1.7, 67.9; P = 0.012], while concomitant use of antimalarial agents along with BLM showed an opposing association (HR: 0.2; 95% CI: 0.03, 0.97; P = 0.046).

          Conclusion

          Addition of BLM to standard-of-care did not prevent LN in patients with active non-renal SLE, but a favourable effect of concomitant use of antimalarials was implicated. Studies of whether effects of B-cell activating factor inhibition on lymphocyte subsets contribute to LN susceptibility are warranted.

          Related collections

          Most cited references31

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Derivation and validation of the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics classification criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus.

          The Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC) group revised and validated the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) classification criteria in order to improve clinical relevance, meet stringent methodology requirements, and incorporate new knowledge regarding the immunology of SLE. The classification criteria were derived from a set of 702 expert-rated patient scenarios. Recursive partitioning was used to derive an initial rule that was simplified and refined based on SLICC physician consensus. The SLICC group validated the classification criteria in a new validation sample of 690 new expert-rated patient scenarios. Seventeen criteria were identified. In the derivation set, the SLICC classification criteria resulted in fewer misclassifications compared with the current ACR classification criteria (49 versus 70; P = 0.0082) and had greater sensitivity (94% versus 86%; P < 0.0001) and equal specificity (92% versus 93%; P = 0.39). In the validation set, the SLICC classification criteria resulted in fewer misclassifications compared with the current ACR classification criteria (62 versus 74; P = 0.24) and had greater sensitivity (97% versus 83%; P < 0.0001) but lower specificity (84% versus 96%; P < 0.0001). The new SLICC classification criteria performed well in a large set of patient scenarios rated by experts. According to the SLICC rule for the classification of SLE, the patient must satisfy at least 4 criteria, including at least one clinical criterion and one immunologic criterion OR the patient must have biopsy-proven lupus nephritis in the presence of antinuclear antibodies or anti-double-stranded DNA antibodies. Copyright © 2012 by the American College of Rheumatology.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Systemic lupus erythematosus disease activity index 2000.

            To describe the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K), a modification of SLEDAI to reflect persistent, active disease in those descriptors that had previously only considered new or recurrent occurrences, and to validate SLEDAI-2K against the original SLEDAI as a predictor for mortality and as a measure of global disease activity in the clinic. All visits in our cohort of 960 patients were used to correlate SLEDAI-2K against the original SLEDAI, and the whole cohort was used to validate SLEDAI-2K as a predictor of mortality. A subgroup of 212 patients with SLE followed at the Lupus Clinic who had 5 regular visits, 3-6 months apart, in 1991-93 was also included. An uninvolved clinician evaluated each patient record and assigned a clinical activity level. The SLEDAI score was calculated from the database according to both the original and modified definitions. SLEDAI-2K correlated highly (r = 0.97) with SLEDAI. Both methods for SLEDAI scoring predicted mortality equally (p = 0.0001), and described similarly the range of disease activity as recognized by the clinician. SLEDAI-2K, which allows for persistent activity in rash, mucous membranes, alopecia, and proteinuria, is suitable for use in clinical trials and studies of prognosis in SLE.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              2019 update of the EULAR recommendations for the management of systemic lupus erythematosus

              Our objective was to update the EULAR recommendations for the management of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), based on emerging new evidence. We performed a systematic literature review (01/2007–12/2017), followed by modified Delphi method, to form questions, elicit expert opinions and reach consensus. Treatment in SLE aims at remission or low disease activity and prevention of flares. Hydroxychloroquine is recommended in all patients with lupus, at a dose not exceeding 5 mg/kg real body weight. During chronic maintenance treatment, glucocorticoids (GC) should be minimised to less than 7.5 mg/day (prednisone equivalent) and, when possible, withdrawn. Appropriate initiation of immunomodulatory agents (methotrexate, azathioprine, mycophenolate) can expedite the tapering/discontinuation of GC. In persistently active or flaring extrarenal disease, add-on belimumab should be considered; rituximab (RTX) may be considered in organ-threatening, refractory disease. Updated specific recommendations are also provided for cutaneous, neuropsychiatric, haematological and renal disease. Patients with SLE should be assessed for their antiphospholipid antibody status, infectious and cardiovascular diseases risk profile and preventative strategies be tailored accordingly. The updated recommendations provide physicians and patients with updated consensus guidance on the management of SLE, combining evidence-base and expert-opinion.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Rheumatology (Oxford)
                Rheumatology (Oxford)
                brheum
                Rheumatology (Oxford, England)
                Oxford University Press
                1462-0324
                1462-0332
                September 2021
                20 December 2020
                20 December 2020
                : 60
                : 9
                : 4348-4354
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institutet and Rheumatology, Karolinska University Hospital , Stockholm, Sweden
                [2 ]Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds , Leeds, UK
                [3 ]Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Rheumatology, Lund University , Lund
                [4 ]Rheumatology/Division of Inflammation and Infection, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University , Linköping
                [5 ]Department of Medical Sciences, Division of Rheumatology, Uppsala University , Uppsala, Sweden
                Author notes
                Correspondence to: Christopher Sjöwall, Rheumatology Unit, Linköping University Hospital, SE-581 85 Linköping, Sweden. E-mail: christopher.sjowall@ 123456liu.se
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4875-5395
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1637-4755
                Article
                keaa796
                10.1093/rheumatology/keaa796
                8409994
                33341888
                8bfaa5a1-4391-4374-86bd-68781b83e4e2
                © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com

                History
                : 02 July 2020
                : 26 October 2020
                : 30 August 2021
                Page count
                Pages: 7
                Funding
                Funded by: Alfred Österlund’s Foundation;
                Funded by: Anna-Greta Crafoord Foundation;
                Funded by: Greta and Johan Kock’s Foundation;
                Funded by: Gustafsson Foundation;
                Funded by: King Gustaf V and Queen Victoria’s Freemasons Foundation;
                Funded by: King Gustaf V’s 80-year Anniversary Foundation;
                Funded by: Professor Nanna Svartz Foundation;
                Funded by: the Region Östergötland (ALF grants);
                Funded by: the Selander Foundation, the Skåne University Hospital and the Medical Faculty of Lund University;
                Funded by: Swedish Research Council, DOI 10.13039/501100004359;
                Funded by: Swedish Rheumatism Association, and the Swedish Society of Medicine (the Ingegerd Johansson donation);
                Categories
                Clinical Science
                AcademicSubjects/MED00360
                AcademicSubjects/MED00360

                Rheumatology
                sle,ln,belimumab,autoantibodies,complement,biologic agents,treatment,adverse events
                Rheumatology
                sle, ln, belimumab, autoantibodies, complement, biologic agents, treatment, adverse events

                Comments

                Comment on this article