12
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Oncological microdissection testicular sperm extraction (Onco‐microTESE) outcomes for fertility preservation of patients with testicular cancer with azoospermia or severe oligoasthenoteratozoospermia

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective

          To determine the success rate of oncological microdissection testicular sperm extraction (onco‐microTESE) in patients with testicular cancer (TC) with azoospermia and severe oligoasthenoteratozoospermia (OAT; <1 million/mL sperm) and to explore any factors that may predict success.

          Patients and Methods

          Case series of outcomes from all consecutive patients (42 testes in 38 patients) that presented or were referred to a single specialist tertiary referral centre for fertility management in the context of TC with severe OAT or azoospermia between August 2015 and August 2022. Biochemical, radiological, and histological parameters were collected for all patients. All patients underwent onco‐microTESE (simultaneous radical inguinal orchidectomy with ex vivo microTESE of the affected testis). Those with unsuccessful surgical sperm retrieval (SSR) from the affected testis underwent contemporaneous contralateral microTESE, if no contraindication was present. The primary outcome was successful SSR from the affected testicle sufficient for assisted reproductive techniques. Secondary outcomes included contralateral microTESE success, the time from referral to procedure, and the total successful fertility preservation rate.

          Results

          Initial onco‐microTESE was successful in 19 of 31 patients (61%) with azoospermia. Contralateral microTESE was successful in a further two of eight patients with azoospermia with failed onco‐microTESE. Overall, 22/31 patients with azoospermia (71%) had successful fertility preservation in this series. In addition, six of seven patients with severe OAT had further sperm harvested by onco‐microTESE to maximise their fertility preservation. All surgery was performed within median (interquartile range) of 7 (5–13) days from presentation.

          Conclusions

          Onco‐microTESE represents an effective method of fertility preservation for sub‐fertile patients with TC without delaying oncological treatment. Knowledge of the fertility status at first presentation is essential to allow for such additional options for optimal fertility preservation in TC.

          Related collections

          Most cited references40

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          World Health Organization reference values for human semen characteristics.

          Semen quality is taken as a surrogate measure of male fecundity in clinical andrology, male fertility, reproductive toxicology, epidemiology and pregnancy risk assessments. Reference intervals for values of semen parameters from a fertile population could provide data from which prognosis of fertility or diagnosis of infertility can be extrapolated. Semen samples from over 4500 men in 14 countries on four continents were obtained from retrospective and prospective analyses on fertile men, men of unknown fertility status and men selected as normozoospermic. Men whose partners had a time-to-pregnancy (TTP) of < or =12 months were chosen as individuals to provide reference distributions for semen parameters. Distributions were also generated for a population assumed to represent the general population. The following one-sided lower reference limits, the fifth centiles (with 95th percent confidence intervals), were generated from men whose partners had TTP < or = 12 months: semen volume, 1.5 ml (1.4-1.7); total sperm number, 39 million per ejaculate (33-46); sperm concentration, 15 million per ml (12-16); vitality, 58% live (55-63); progressive motility, 32% (31-34); total (progressive + non-progressive) motility, 40% (38-42); morphologically normal forms, 4.0% (3.0-4.0). Semen quality of the reference population was superior to that of the men from the general population and normozoospermic men. The data represent sound reference distributions of semen characteristics of fertile men in a number of countries. They provide an appropriate tool in conjunction with clinical data to evaluate a patient's semen quality and prospects for fertility.
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Temporal trends in sperm count: a systematic review and meta-regression analysis

            Reported declines in sperm counts remain controversial today and recent trends are unknown. A definitive meta-analysis is critical given the predictive value of sperm count for fertility, morbidity and mortality.
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              European Association of Urology Guidelines on Sexual and Reproductive Health—2021 Update: Male Sexual Dysfunction

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                majed.shabbir@gstt.nhs.uk
                Journal
                BJU Int
                BJU Int
                10.1111/(ISSN)1464-410X
                BJU
                Bju International
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                1464-4096
                1464-410X
                16 November 2024
                February 2025
                : 135
                : 2 ( doiID: 10.1111/bju.v135.2 )
                : 295-302
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Department of Urology Guy's Hospital London UK
                [ 2 ] The Assisted Conception Unit Guy's Hospital London UK
                [ 3 ] King's College London London UK
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence: Majid Shabbir, Department of Urology, Guy's Hospital, Great Maze Pond, London SE1 9RT, UK.

                e‐mail: majed.shabbir@ 123456gstt.nhs.uk

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3732-217X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7846-1470
                Article
                BJU16553 BJU-2024-0067.R3
                10.1111/bju.16553
                11746000
                39548846
                8c06cd8b-d351-4376-bf9e-b37242d6f121
                © 2024 The Author(s). BJU International published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of BJU International.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 2, Pages: 8, Words: 6713
                Categories
                Original Article
                Original Article
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                February 2025
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:6.5.2 mode:remove_FC converted:20.01.2025

                Urology
                azoospermia,fertility preservation,oligoasthenoteratozoospermia,surgical sperm retrieval,testicular cancer

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                Related Documents Log