19
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Multiparametric cardiovascular magnetic resonance surveillance of acute cardiac allograft rejection and characterisation of transplantation-associated myocardial injury: a pilot study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Serial surveillance endomyocardial biopsies are performed in patients who have recently undergone heart transplantation in order to detect acute cardiac allograft rejection (ACAR) before symptoms occur, however the biopsy process is associated with a number of limitations. This study aimed to prospectively and longitudinally evaluate the performance of multiparametric cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) for detecting and monitoring ACAR in the early phase post-transplant, and characterize graft recovery following transplantation.

          Methods

          All patients receiving a heart transplant at a single UK centre over a period of 25 months were approached within one month of transplantation. Multiparametric CMR was prospectively performed on the same day as biopsy on four separate occasions (6 weeks, 10 weeks, 15 weeks and 20 weeks post-transplant). CMR included assessment of global and regional ventricular function, myocardial tissue characterization (T1 mapping, T2 mapping, extracellular volume, LGE) and pixel-wise absolute myocardial blood flow quantification. CMR parameters were compared with biopsy findings. As is standard, grade 2R or higher ACAR was considered significant.

          Results

          88 CMR-matched biopsies were performed in 22 patients. Eight (9%) biopsies in 5 patients demonstrated significant ACAR. Significant ACAR was associated with a reduction in circumferential strain (−12.7 ± 2.5% vs. -13.7 ± 3.6%, p = 0.047) but there was considerable overlap between groups. Whilst trends were observed between ACAR and proposed CMR markers of oedema, particularly after adjusting for primary graft dysfunction, differences were not significant. Significant improvements were seen in markers of graft structure and contractility, oedema and microvascular function over the period studied, although few parameters normalised.

          Conclusions

          This study provides novel insight into the myocardial injury associated with transplantation, and its recovery, however multiparametric CMR was not able to accurately detect ACAR during the early phase post-transplantation.

          Related collections

          Most cited references21

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Revision of the 1990 working formulation for the standardization of nomenclature in the diagnosis of heart rejection.

          In 1990, an international grading system for cardiac allograft biopsies was adopted by the International Society for Heart Transplantation. This system has served the heart transplant community well, facilitating communication between transplant centers, especially with regard to patient management and research. In 2004, under the direction of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT), a multidisciplinary review of the cardiac biopsy grading system was undertaken to address challenges and inconsistencies in its use and to address recent advances in the knowledge of antibody-mediated rejection. This article summarizes the revised consensus classification for cardiac allograft rejection. In brief, the revised (R) categories of cellular rejection are as follows: Grade 0 R--no rejection (no change from 1990); Grade 1 R--mild rejection (1990 Grades 1A, 1B and 2); Grade 2 R--moderate rejection (1990 Grade 3A); and Grade 3 R--severe rejection (1990 Grades 3B and 4). Because the histologic sub-types of Quilty A and Quilty B have never been shown to have clinical significance, the "A" and "B" designations have been eliminated. Recommendations are also made for the histologic recognition and immunohistologic investigation of acute antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) with the expectation that greater standardization of the assessment of this controversial entity will clarify its clinical significance. Technical considerations in biopsy processing are also addressed. This consensus revision of the Working Formulation was approved by the ISHLT Board of Directors in December 2004.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            T2-prepared SSFP improves diagnostic confidence in edema imaging in acute myocardial infarction compared to turbo spin echo.

            T2-weighted MRI of edema in acute myocardial infarction (MI) provides a means of differentiating acute and chronic MI, and assessing the area at risk of infarction. Conventional T2-weighted imaging of edema uses a turbo spin-echo (TSE) readout with dark-blood preparation. Clinical applications of dark-blood TSE methods can be limited by artifacts such as posterior wall signal loss due to through-plane motion, and bright subendocardial artifacts due to stagnant blood. Single-shot imaging with a T2-prepared SSFP readout provides an alternative to dark-blood TSE and may be conducted during free breathing. We hypothesized that T2-prepared SSFP would be a more reliable method than dark-blood TSE for imaging of edema in patients with MI. In patients with MI (22 acute and nine chronic MI cases), T2-weighted imaging with both methods was performed prior to contrast administration and delayed-enhancement imaging. The T2-weighted images using TSE were nondiagnostic in three of 31 cases, while six additional cases rated as being of diagnostic quality yielded incorrect diagnoses. In all 31 cases the T2-prepared SSFP images were rated as diagnostic quality, correctly differentiated acute or chronic MI, and correctly determined the coronary territory. Free-breathing T2 prepared SSFP provides T2-weighted images of acute MI with fewer artifacts and better diagnostic accuracy than conventional dark-blood TSE. Published 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Myocardial blood flow quantification with MRI by model-independent deconvolution.

              Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging during the first pass of an injected contrast agent has been used to assess myocardial perfusion, but the quantification of blood flow has been generally judged as too complex for its clinical application. This study demonstrates the feasibility of applying model-independent deconvolution to the measured tissue residue curves to quantify myocardial perfusion. Model-independent approaches only require minimal user interaction or expertise in modeling. Monte Carlo simulations were performed with contrast-to-noise ratios typical of MR myocardial perfusion studies to determine the accuracy of the resulting blood flow estimates. With a B-spline representation of the tissue impulse response and Tikhonov regularization, the bias of blood flow estimates obtained by model-independent deconvolution was less than 1% in all cases for peak contrast to noise ratios in the range from 15:1 to 20:1. The relative dispersion of blood flow estimates in Monte Carlo simulations was less than 7%. Comparison of MR blood flow estimates against measurements with radio-isotope labeled microspheres indicated excellent linear correlation (R2 = 0.995, slope: 0.96, intercept: 0.06). It can be concluded from these studies that the application of myocardial blood flow quantification with MRI can be performed with model-independent methods, and this should support a more widespread use of blood flow quantification in the clinical environment.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                J Cardiovasc Magn Reson
                J Cardiovasc Magn Reson
                Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
                BioMed Central
                1097-6647
                1532-429X
                2014
                20 July 2014
                : 16
                : 1
                : 52
                Affiliations
                [1 ]North West Heart Centre and The Transplant Centre, University Hospital of South Manchester, Manchester, UK
                [2 ]Centre for Imaging Sciences & Biomedical Imaging Institute, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
                [3 ]Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
                [4 ]Alliance Medical Cardiac MRI Unit, Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester, UK
                [5 ]Department of Pathology, University Hospital of South, Manchester, UK
                [6 ]Christie Medical Physics and Engineering, The Christie Hospital, Manchester, UK
                Article
                s12968-014-0052-6
                10.1186/s12968-014-0052-6
                4121512
                25160654
                8c37073a-dd3a-476b-9ec5-cd9a8306877c
                Copyright © 2014 Miller et al. ;licensee BioMed Central

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The CreativeCommons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 1 April 2014
                : 30 June 2014
                Categories
                Research

                Cardiovascular Medicine
                cardiovascular magnetic resonance,heart transplantation,acute rejection

                Comments

                Comment on this article