17
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Relationship between endobronchial ultrasound‐guided (EBUS)‐transbronchial needle aspiration utility and computed tomography staging, node size at EBUS, and positron emission tomography scan node standard uptake values: A retrospective analysis

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Endobronchial ultrasound‐guided transbronchial needle aspiration ( EBUSTBNA) diagnoses and stages mediastinal lymph node pathology. This retrospective study determined the relationship between EBUSTBNA utility and non‐small cell lung cancer ( NSCLC) stage, lymph node size, and positron emission tomography ( PET) standard uptake values (SUV), and the utility of neck ultrasound in bulky mediastinal disease.

          Methods

          Data of 284 consecutive patients who had undergone EBUSTBNA was collected . Two hundred patients had suspected NSCLC, with 148 confirmed NSCLC cases. The diagnostic utility of EBUSTBNA was determined according to NSCLC stage, EBUS lymph node size, PET SUV, use in distal metastases, and mutation testing. The utility of neck ultrasound for N3 disease was calculated in patients with bulky mediastinal disease.

          Results

          EBUSTBNA was well tolerated with 97% sensitivity in distant metastatic disease, avoiding the need for distal metastases biopsy in 81% of cases. It had equivalent diagnostic accuracy in all NSCLC stages and in lymph nodes <10 mm, <20 mm or >20 mm (sensitivity >92% in all cases), with no mutation testing failures. EBUSTBNA had 33% sensitivity in PET indolent ( SUV < 4) nodes and 79% sensitivity in PET active nodes ( SUV > 4). EBUSTBNA diagnosed 12 cases of lymphoma without flow cytometry.

          Conclusions

          The use of EBUSTBNA meant that distant metastatic biopsy was avoided in 81% of cases, performing well irrespective of cancer stage, node size, and facilitating mutation testing. Neck ultrasound failed to detect N3 disease in patients with bulky mediastinal disease. EBUSTBNA had a sensitivity of 33% for metastases in PET negative nodes, highlighting PET limitations.

          Related collections

          Most cited references23

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Noninvasive staging of non-small cell lung cancer: ACCP evidenced-based clinical practice guidelines (2nd edition).

          Correctly staging lung cancer is important because the treatment options and the prognosis differ significantly by stage. Several noninvasive imaging studies including chest CT scanning and positron emission tomography (PET) scanning are available. Understanding the test characteristics of these noninvasive staging studies is critical to decision making. Test characteristics for the noninvasive staging studies were updated from the first iteration of the lung cancer guidelines using systematic searches of the MEDLINE, HealthStar, and Cochrane Library databases up to May 2006, including selected metaanalyses, practice guidelines, and reviews. Study designs and results are summarized in evidence tables. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of CT scanning for identifying mediastinal lymph node metastasis were 51% (95% confidence interval [CI], 47 to 54%) and 85% (95% CI, 84 to 88%), respectively, confirming that CT scanning has limited ability either to rule in or exclude mediastinal metastasis. For PET scanning, the pooled estimates of sensitivity and specificity for identifying mediastinal metastasis were 74% (95% CI, 69 to 79%) and 85% (95% CI, 82 to 88%), respectively. These findings demonstrate that PET scanning is more accurate than CT scanning. If the clinical evaluation in search of metastatic disease is negative, the likelihood of finding metastasis is low. CT scanning of the chest is useful in providing anatomic detail, but the accuracy of chest CT scanning in differentiating benign from malignant lymph nodes in the mediastinum is poor. PET scanning has much better sensitivity and specificity than chest CT scanning for staging lung cancer in the mediastinum, and distant metastatic disease can be detected by PET scanning. With either test, abnormal findings must be confirmed by tissue biopsy to ensure accurate staging.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            18F-FDG PET for mediastinal staging of lung cancer: which SUV threshold makes sense?

            (18)F-FDG PET is the most accurate noninvasive modality for staging mediastinal lymph nodes in lung cancer. Besides using visual image interpretation, some institutions use standardized uptake value (SUV) measurements in lymph nodes. Mostly, an SUV of 2.5 is used as the cutoff, but this choice was never deduced from respective studies. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses demonstrated that SUV thresholds of more than 4 resulted in the highest accuracy. But these high cutoffs imply high false-negative rates (FNRs). The aim of our evaluation was to determine an optimal SUV threshold and to compare its diagnostic performance with the results of visual interpretation. This retrospective study included 95 patients with suspected lung cancer who underwent mediastinoscopy/mediastinal lymphadenectomy after (18)F-FDG PET (90-150 min after 250 MBq of (18)F-FDG). Maximum SUV was measured in 371 lymph node regions biopsied afterward and visually interpreted using a 6-level score (- - - through + + +). Diagnostic performance was assessed by ROC analysis. FNR and false-positive rate (FPR), the sum of both error rates (FNR + FPR), and diagnostic accuracy were plotted against a hypothetical SUV threshold to determine the optimum SUV threshold. SUVs in metastatic lymph nodes were higher (mean +/- SD, 7.1 +/- 4.5; range, 1.4-26.9; n = 70) than in tumor-free lymph node stations (2.4 +/- 1.7; range, 0.6-14.9; n = 301; P < 0.01). Inflammatory lymph nodes exhibited slightly increased SUVs (2.7 +/- 2.0; range, 0.8-14.9; n = 146). The plot of error rates featured a minimum of the sum FNR + FPR for an SUV of 2.5. With increasing SUV threshold, the FPR decreased most prominently up to that value whereas a continuous rise of FNR was noticed. Highest diagnostic accuracy was achieved with an SUV of 4.5. The areas under the ROC curves demonstrated that visual interpretation tends to be more accurate than SUV quantification (visual, 0.930 +/- 0.022; SUV, 0.899 +/- 0.025; P = 0.241). Using an SUV of 2.5 as the threshold, the resulting sensitivity, specificity, and negative predictive value were 89%, 84%, and 96%, respectively. For mediastinal staging, the choice of an SUV of 2.5 as the threshold is justified because FNR + FPR is minimized. The resulting high negative predictive value of 96% allows the omission of mediastinoscopy in patients with negative mediastinal findings on (18)F-FDG PET images. For the experienced observer, visual analysis should be relied on primarily, with calculation of the SUV used, at most, as a secondary aid. For the less experienced observer, the SUV may be of greater value.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Maximum standard uptake value of mediastinal lymph nodes on integrated FDG-PET-CT predicts pathology in patients with non-small cell lung cancer.

              Positron emission tomography (PET) scans often help direct biopsies of mediastinal lymph nodes in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but the maximum standard uptake value (maxSUV) of individual nodes has not been evaluated. This is a prospective study of consecutive patients with NSCLC, all of whom underwent integrated fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission-computed tomography (FDG-PET-CT) and had biopsy or resection of their mediastinal lymph nodes. There were 397 patients. One-hundred and forty-three patients had N2 disease and 1,252 N2 nodes were pathologically examined. The median maxSUV of the nodes that had metastatic disease were the following: for the 2R node, 10.4 (range, 0-18.6); for 4R, 8.6 (range, 0-18.3); for 5, 8.9 (range, 0-26.3); for 6, 7.6 (range, 0-19.6); for 7, 7.7 (range, 0-14); for 8 and 9, 5.4 (range, 0-8.9). The median maxSUV for all of the N2 nodes that were benign was 0 (range, 0-18.8) (p < 0.05 for all stations except for nodes 8 and 9). When a maxSUV of 5.3 is used the accuracy of integrated FDG-PET-CT for each N2 nodal station is maximized and is at least 92% for each. The maxSUV of individual mediastinal lymph nodes is a predictor of malignancy. There is overlap between false and true positives. Definitive biopsies are required to prove cancer irrespective of the maxSUV value. However, when a maxSUV of 5.3 is used instead of the traditional value of 2.5, the accuracy for FDG-PET-CT for each N2 nodal station increases to at least 92%.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                andrewmedford@hotmail.com
                Journal
                Thorac Cancer
                Thorac Cancer
                10.1111/(ISSN)1759-7714
                TCA
                Thoracic Cancer
                John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd (Melbourne )
                1759-7706
                1759-7714
                24 April 2017
                July 2017
                : 8
                : 4 ( doiID: 10.1111/tca.2017.8.issue-4 )
                : 285-290
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] North Bristol Lung CentreNorth Bristol NHS Trust, Southmead Hospital BristolUK
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence

                Andrew R.L. Medford, North Bristol Lung Centre, Level 6 Gate 10, Brunel Building, Southmead Hospital, Westbury‐on‐Trym, Bristol BS10 5NB, UK.

                Tel: +44 117 414 6340

                Fax: +44 117 414 9457

                Email: andrewmedford@ 123456hotmail.com

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5445-5949
                Article
                TCA12438
                10.1111/1759-7714.12438
                5494455
                28436173
                8c582ee4-f73f-402c-b94c-8c0b9165cff1
                © 2017 The Authors. Thoracic Cancer published by China Lung Oncology Group and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd

                This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.

                History
                : 11 February 2017
                : 05 March 2017
                : 07 March 2017
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 4, Pages: 1, Words: 4339
                Categories
                Original Article
                Original Articles
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                tca12438
                July 2017
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_NLMPMC version:5.1.2 mode:remove_FC converted:03.07.2017

                diagnostic utility,endobronchial ultrasound,lung cancer,pet scan,staging

                Comments

                Comment on this article