6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Recent advances in understanding and managing adenomyosis

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Adenomyosis is a benign uterine disorder in which endometrial glands and stroma are pathologically demonstrated in the uterine myometrium and it is considered a specific entity in the PALM-COEIN FIGO (polyp; adenomyosis; leiomyoma; malignancy and hyperplasia; coagulopathy; ovulatory dysfunction; endometrial; iatrogenic; and not yet classified – International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics) classification of causes of abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB). Although it has always been considered the classic condition of multiparous women over 40 years old who have pain and heavy menstrual bleeding, diagnosed at hysterectomy, the epidemiological scenario has completely changed. Adenomyosis is increasingly identified in young women with pain, AUB, infertility, or no symptoms by using imaging techniques such as transvaginal ultrasound and magnetic resonance. However, there is no agreement on the definition and classification of adenomyotic lesions from both the histopathology and the imaging point of view, and the diagnosis remains difficult and unclear. A uniform and shared reporting system needs to be implemented in order to improve our understanding on imaging features, their relationship with pathogenic theories, and their importance in terms of clinical symptoms and response to treatment. In fact, adenomyosis pathogenesis remains elusive and not a single theory can explain all of the different phenotypes of the disease. Furthermore, adenomyosis often coexists with other gynecological conditions, such as endometriosis and uterine fibroids, increasing the heterogeneity of available data. Treatment requires a lifelong management plan as the disease has a negative impact on quality of life in terms of menstrual symptoms, fertility, and pregnancy outcome and has a high risk of miscarriage and obstetric complications.

          Related collections

          Most cited references86

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          FIGO classification system (PALM-COEIN) for causes of abnormal uterine bleeding in nongravid women of reproductive age.

          There is general inconsistency in the nomenclature used to describe abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB), in addition to a plethora of potential causes-several of which may coexist in a given individual. It seems clear that the development of consistent and universally accepted nomenclature is a step toward rectifying this unsatisfactory circumstance. Another requirement is the development of a classification system, on several levels, for the causes of AUB, which can be used by clinicians, investigators, and even patients to facilitate communication, clinical care, and research. This manuscript describes an ongoing process designed to achieve these goals, and presents for consideration the PALM-COEIN (polyp; adenomyosis; leiomyoma; malignancy and hyperplasia; coagulopathy; ovulatory dysfunction; endometrial; iatrogenic; and not yet classified) classification system for AUB, which has been approved by the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) Executive Board as a FIGO classification system. Copyright © 2011. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Clonogenicity of human endometrial epithelial and stromal cells.

            The human endometrium regenerates from the lower basalis layer, a germinal compartment that persists after menstruation to give rise to the new upper functionalis layer. Because adult stem cells are present in tissues that undergo regeneration, we hypothesized that human endometrium contains small populations of epithelial and stromal stem cells responsible for cyclical regeneration of endometrial glands and stroma and that these cells would exhibit clonogenicity, a stem-cell property. The aims of this study were to determine 1) the clonogenic activity of human endometrial epithelial and stromal cells, 2) which growth factors support this clonogenic activity, and 3) determine the cellular phenotypes of the clones. Endometrial tissue was obtained from women undergoing hysterectomy. Purified single- cell suspensions of epithelial and stromal cells were cultured at cloning density (300-500/cm(2)) in serum medium or in serum- free medium supplemented with one of eight growth factors. Small numbers of epithelial (0.22%) and stromal cells (1.25%) initiated colonies in serum-containing medium. The majority of colonies were small, containing large, loosely arranged cells, and 37% of epithelial and 1 in 60 of stromal colonies were classified as large, comprising small, densely packed cells. In serum-free medium, transforming growth factor-alpha (TGF alpha), epidermal growth factor (EGF), platelet-derived growth factor-BB (PDGF-BB) strongly supported clonogenicity of epithelial cells, while leukemia-inhibitory factor (LIF), hepatocyte growth factor (HGF), stem-cell factor (SCF), insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF- I) were weakly supportive, and basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) was without effect. TGF alpha, EGF, PDGF-BB, and bFGF supported stromal cell clonogenicity, while HGF, SCF, LIF, and IGF- I were without effect. Small epithelial colonies expressed three epithelial markers but not stromal markers; however, large epithelial colonies showed little reactivity for all markers except alpha(6)-integrin. All stromal colonies contained fibroblasts, expressing stromal markers, and in some colonies, myofibroblasts were also identified. This analysis of human endometrium has demonstrated the presence of rare clonogenic epithelial and stromal cells with high proliferative potential, providing the first evidence for the existence of putative endometrial epithelial and stromal stem cells.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Endometrial stem/progenitor cells: the first 10 years

              BACKGROUND The existence of stem/progenitor cells in the endometrium was postulated many years ago, but the first functional evidence was only published in 2004. The identification of rare epithelial and stromal populations of clonogenic cells in human endometrium has opened an active area of research on endometrial stem/progenitor cells in the subsequent 10 years. METHODS The published literature was searched using the PubMed database with the search terms ‘endometrial stem cells and menstrual blood stem cells' until December 2014. RESULTS Endometrial epithelial stem/progenitor cells have been identified as clonogenic cells in human and as label-retaining or CD44+ cells in mouse endometrium, but their characterization has been modest. In contrast, endometrial mesenchymal stem/stromal cells (MSCs) have been well characterized and show similar properties to bone marrow MSCs. Specific markers for their enrichment have been identified, CD146+PDGFRβ+ (platelet-derived growth factor receptor beta) and SUSD2+ (sushi domain containing-2), which detected their perivascular location and likely pericyte identity in endometrial basalis and functionalis vessels. Transcriptomics and secretomics of SUSD2+ cells confirm their perivascular phenotype. Stromal fibroblasts cultured from endometrial tissue or menstrual blood also have some MSC characteristics and demonstrate broad multilineage differentiation potential for mesodermal, endodermal and ectodermal lineages, indicating their plasticity. Side population (SP) cells are a mixed population, although predominantly vascular cells, which exhibit adult stem cell properties, including tissue reconstitution. There is some evidence that bone marrow cells contribute a small population of endometrial epithelial and stromal cells. The discovery of specific markers for endometrial stem/progenitor cells has enabled the examination of their role in endometrial proliferative disorders, including endometriosis, adenomyosis and Asherman's syndrome. Endometrial MSCs (eMSCs) and menstrual blood stromal fibroblasts are an attractive source of MSCs for regenerative medicine because of their relative ease of acquisition with minimal morbidity. Their homologous and non-homologous use as autologous and allogeneic cells for therapeutic purposes is currently being assessed in preclinical animal models of pelvic organ prolapse and phase I/II clinical trials for cardiac failure. eMSCs and stromal fibroblasts also exhibit non-stem cell-associated immunomodulatory and anti-inflammatory properties, further emphasizing their desirable properties for cell-based therapies. CONCLUSIONS Much has been learnt about endometrial stem/progenitor cells in the 10 years since their discovery, although several unresolved issues remain. These include rationalizing the terminology and diagnostic characteristics used for distinguishing perivascular stem/progenitor cells from stromal fibroblasts, which also have considerable differentiation potential. The hierarchical relationship between clonogenic epithelial progenitor cells, endometrial and decidual SP cells, CD146+PDGFR-β+ and SUSD2+ cells and menstrual blood stromal fibroblasts still needs to be resolved. Developing more genetic animal models for investigating the role of endometrial stem/progenitor cells in endometrial disorders is required, as well as elucidating which bone marrow cells contribute to endometrial tissue. Deep sequencing and epigenetic profiling of enriched populations of endometrial stem/progenitor cells and their differentiated progeny at the population and single-cell level will shed new light on the regulation and function of endometrial stem/progenitor cells.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: MethodologyRole: Writing – Original Draft PreparationRole: Writing – Review & Editing
                Role: SupervisionRole: Writing – Review & Editing
                Journal
                F1000Res
                F1000Res
                F1000Research
                F1000Research
                F1000 Research Limited (London, UK )
                2046-1402
                13 March 2019
                2019
                : 8
                : F1000 Faculty Rev-283
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Neuroscience, Psychology, Pharmacology and Child Health (NEUROFARBA), University of Florence, Florence, Largo Brambilla 3, 50134, Italy
                [2 ]Department of Molecular and Developmental Medicine, University of Siena, Siena, viale Mario Bracci 16, 53100, Italy
                [3 ]Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Maternity and Child Health, University Hospital Florence, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Largo Brambilla 3, 50134, Italy
                [4 ]Department of Experimental, Clinical and Biomedical Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Largo Brambilla 3, 50134, Italy
                Author notes

                No competing interests were disclosed.

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5790-587X
                Article
                10.12688/f1000research.17242.1
                6419978
                30918629
                8c5d99af-0014-472e-ba32-9050526ed7ae
                Copyright: © 2019 Vannuccini S and Petraglia F

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 6 March 2019
                Funding
                The author(s) declared that no grants were involved in supporting this work.
                Categories
                Review
                Articles

                abnormal uterine bleeding,adenomyosis,endometriosis,histology,hormonal treatment,infertility,magnetic resonance imaging (mri),medical treatment,pelvic pain,pregnancy outcome,transvaginal ultrasound sonography (tvus),uterine fibroids.

                Comments

                Comment on this article